A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1158-1169

  Flynn, Kathryn E ^a   Smith, Maureen A ^b   Vanness, David ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Communication; Decision making; Patient preferences; Survey research; US

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SURVEY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; TYPOLOGY;

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PHYSICIAN; PRESCRIPTION; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIOECONOMICS;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

EID: 33745846390     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.030     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arora N.K., and McHorney C.A. Patient preferences for medical decision making: Who really wants to participate?. Medical Care 38 3 (2000) 335-341
2. Bazzoli G.J., Shortell S.M., Dubbs N., Chan C., and Kralovec P. A taxonomy of health networks and systems: Bringing order out of chaos. Health Services Research 33 6 (1999) 1683-1717
3. Benbassat J., Pilpel D., and Tidhar M. Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 24 2 (1998) 81-88
4. Charles C., Gafni A., and Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44 5 (1997) 681-692
5. Charles C., Gafni A., and Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine 49 5 (1999) 651-661
6. Deber R.B., Kraetschmer N., and Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?. Archives of Internal Mediicine 156 13 (1996) 1414-1420
7. Degner L.F., and Sloan J.A. Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 45 9 (1992) 941-950
8. Dubbs N.L., Bazzoli G.J., Shortell S.M., and Kralovec P.D. Reexamining organizational configurations: An update, validation, and expansion of the taxonomy of health networks and systems. Health Services Research 39 1 (2004) 207-220
9. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development. Multidimensional functional assessment: The OARS methodology (1978), Duke University, Durham, NC
10. Emanuel E.J., and Emanuel L.L. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association 267 16 (1992) 2221-2226
11. Ende J., Kazis L., Ash A., and Moskowitz M.A. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine 4 1 (1989) 23-30
12. Falkum E., and Forde R. Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians. Social Science & Medicine 52 2 (2001) 239-248
13. Ford S., Schofield T., and Hope T. Are patients' decision-making preferences being met?. Health Expectations 6 1 (2003) 72-80
14. Gerteis M., Edgman-Levitan S., Walker J.D., Stoke D.M., Cleary P.D., and Delbanco T.L. What patients really want. Health Management Quarterly 15 3 (1993) 2-6
15. Gordon A.D. Classification (1999), Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
16. Gotler R.S., Flocke S.A., Goodwin M.A., Zyzanski S.J., Murray T.H., and Stange K.C. Facilitating participatory decision-making: What happens in real-world community practice?. Medical Care 38 12 (2000) 1200-1209
17. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
18. Institute of Medicine. Improving medical education: Enhancing the behavioral and social science content of medical school curricula (2004), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
19. Kaplan S.H., Gandek B., Greenfield S., Rogers W., and Ware J.E. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Medical Care 33 12 (1995) 1176-1187
20. Katz J. The silent world of doctor and patient (1984), Free Press, New York
21. Kaufman L., and Rousseeuw P.J. Finding groups in data (1990), Wiley, New York
22. Krantz D.S., Baum A., and Wideman M. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 5 (1980) 977-990
23. McNutt R.A. Shared medical decision making: Problems, process, progress. Journal of General Internal Medicine 292 20 (2004) 2516-2518
24. Nease Jr. R.F., and Brooks W.B. Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: The Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey. Journal of General Internal Medicine 10 11 (1995) 593-600
25. O'Connor A.M., Boyd N.F., Warde P., Stolbach L., and Till J.E. Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: Influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences. Journal of Chronic Diseases 40 8 (1987) 811-818
26. Ong L.M., de Haes J.C., Hoos A.M., and Lammes F.B. Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 40 7 (1995) 903-918
27. Quill T.E., and Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: Finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Annals of Internal Medicine 125 9 (1996) 763-769
28. Robinson A., and Thomson R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: Implication for the use of decision support tools. Quality in Health Care 10 Suppl 1 (2001) i34-i38
29. SAS Institute. SAS statistical software (2002), SAS Institute, Cary, NC
30. Schonlau M. The clustergram: A graph for visualizing hierarchical and non-hierarchical cluster analyses. The Stata Journal 3 (2002) 316-327
31. StataCorp. Stata statistical software (2003), Stata Corporation, College Station, TX
32. Stevenson F.A., Barry C.A., Britten N., Barber N., and Bradley C.P. Doctor-patient communication about drugs: The evidence for shared decision making. Social Science & Medicine 50 6 (2000) 829-840
33. Strull W.M., Lo B., and Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?. Journal of General Internal Medicine 252 21 (1984) 2990-2994
34. Thomson ISI (2003). Web of Knowledge. Accessed June 10, 2004. http://portal.isiknowledge.com.
35. Thompson S.C., Pitts J.S., and Schwankovsky L. Preferences for involvement in medical decision-making: Situational and demographic influences. Patient Education and Counseling 22 3 (1993) 133-140
36. US Bureau of the Census. Educational attainment in the united states: march 2000, current population reports (2000), Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
37. US Census Bureau (2004). US interim projections by age, sex, race, and hispanic origin. Accessed October 14, 2004. http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj.
38. Weesie J. Seemingly unrelated estimation and the cluster-adjusted sandwich estimator. Stata Technical Bulletin 52 (1999) 34-47
39. Whitney S.N., McGuire A.L., and McCullough L.B. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Annals of Internal Medicine 140 1 (2004) 54-59
40. Xu, J., & Long, J.S. (2005). Using the delta method to construct confidence intervals for predicted probabilities, rates, and discrete changes. http://www.indiana.edu/~jslsoc/stata/spostci/documentation/prvalue2-delta.pdf.