Examining the characteristics of student postings that are liked and linked in a CSCL environment

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1281-1294

  Makos, Alexandra ^a   Lee, Kyungmee ^a   Zingaro, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; ITERATIVE METHODS; SCAFFOLDS;

COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR; COGNITIVE CHARACTERISTICS; COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY; DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH; INTERACTIVE BEHAVIOR; LEARNING COMMUNITY; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84943776383     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12201     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen, I. E., and, Seaman, J., (2013). Changing course: ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium.
2. Bales, R. F., (1999). Social interaction systems: theory and measurement. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
3. Brennan, S. E., (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, 95-129.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and, Duguid, P., (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 1, 32-42.
5. Clark, H. H., and, Brennan, S. E., (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 13, 127-149.
6. Clark, H. H., and, Schaefer, E. F., (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 2, 259-294.
7. Cleveland-Innes, M., and, Campbell, P., (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 4, 269-292.
8. Clouder, L., Dalley, J., Hargreaves, J., Parkes, S., Sellars, J., and, Toms, J., (2006). Electronic [re] constitution of groups: group dynamics from face-to-face to an online setting. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 4, 467-480.
9. Coxhead, A., (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 2, 213-238.
10. Çelik, S., (2013). Unspoken social dynamics in an online discussion group: the disconnect between attitudes and overt behavior of English language teaching graduate students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 4, 1-19.
11. Dewey, J., (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
12. Flesch, R. F., (1951). How to test readability. New York: Harper.
13. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and, Archer, W., (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2, 2-3, 87-105.
14. Gunawardena, C. N., (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 2, 147-166.
15. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., and, Anderson, T., (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 4, 397-431.
16. Hacker, D. J., and, Neiderhauser, D. S., (2000). Promoting deep and durable learning in the online classroom. In, R. E. Weiss, D. S. Knowlton, and, B. W. Speck, (Eds), Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom (pp. 53-64). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17. Hewitt, J., (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 4, 567-589.
18. Hewitt, J., Brett, C., and, Peters, V., (2007). Scan rate: a new metric for the analysis of reading behaviors in asynchronous computer conferencing environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21, 4, 215-231.
19. Hiltz, S. R., (1994). The virtual classroom: learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Johnson, D. W., and, Johnson, R. T., (1999). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Kanuka, H., and, Anderson, T., (1998). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13, 1, 57-74.
22. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., and, Jochems, W., (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 3, 335-353.
23. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., and, Vermeulen, M., (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48, 4, 229-242.
24. Lave, J., and, Wenger, E., (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Meyer, K. A., (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: the role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 3, 55-65.
26. Oztok, M., (2013). Reconceptualizing the pedagogical value of student facilitation. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.817440.
27. Oztok, M., Wilton, L., Zingaro, D., MacKinnon, K., Makos, A., Phirangee, K., etal (2014). Polysynchronous: dialogic construction of time in online learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11, 2, 154-161.
28. Pang, B., and, Lee, L., (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2, 1, 1-135.
29. Rovai, A. P., (2001). Classroom community at a distance: a comparative analysis of two ALN-based university programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 2, 105-118.
30. Scardamalia, M., (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In, B. Smith, (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
31. Scardamalia, M., and, Bereiter, C., (2003). Knowledge building. In, J. W. Guthrie, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan.
32. Solan, A. M., and, Linardopoulos, N., (2011). Development, implementation, and evaluation of a grading rubric for online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7, 4, 452-464.
33. Sproull, L., and, Faraj, S., (1997). Atheism, sex, and databases: the net as a social technology. In, S. Kiesler, (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 35-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates Inc.
34. Swan, K., (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities, 6, 13-31.
35. Van der Linden, J. L., and, Renshaw, P., (Eds) (2004). Dialogic learning: shifting perspectives to learning, instruction, and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
36. Vrasidas, C., (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6, 4, 339-362.
37. Vygotsky, L. L. S., (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., and, Hightower, R., (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: an exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28, 4, 975-996.
39. Wilcox, R. R., (2005). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
40. Zingaro, D., (2012). Student moderators in asynchronous online discussion: a question of questions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8, 3, 159-173.