Joint models of disagreement and stance in online debate

ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2015, Pages 116-125

  Sridhar, Dhanya ^a   Foulds, James ^a   Huang, Bert ^a   Getoor, Lise ^b   Walker, Marilyn ^b  

^a University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

ACCURACY IMPROVEMENT; CLASSIFICATION MODELS; CORRECT MODELS; JOINT MODELS; LOCAL CLASSIFIER; MODELING DECISIONS; PERCENTAGE POINTS; PROBABILISTIC MODELING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84943753930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-1012     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Rob Abbott, Marilyn Walker, Jean E. Fox Tree, Pranav Anand, Robeson Bowmani, and Joseph King. 2011. How can you say such things!: Recognizing disagreement in informal political argument. In ACL Workshop on Language and Social Media.
2. Amjad Abu-Jbara and Dragomir R Radev. 2013. Identifying opinion subgroups in Arabic online discussions. In ACL.
3. Stephen H. Bach, Bert Huang, Ben London, and Lise Getoor. 2013. Hinge-loss Markov random fields: Convex inference for structured prediction. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI).
4. S. H. Bach, M. Broecheler, B. Huang, and L. Getoor. 2015. Hinge-loss Markov random fields and probabilistic soft logic. arXiv:1505.04406 [cs.LG].
5. Alexandra Balahur, Zornitsa Kozareva, and Andres Montoyo. 2009. Determining the polarity and source of opinions expressed in political debates. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing.
6. Mohit Bansal, Claire Cardie, and Lillian Lee. 2008. The power of negative thinking: Exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. COLING.
7. Filip Boltuzíc and Jan Snajder. 2014. Back up your stance: recognizing arguments in online discussions. In ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining.
8. Clinton Burfoot, Steven Bird, and Timothy Baldwin. 2011. Collective classification of congressional floor-debate transcripts. In ACL.
9. Ming-Wei Chang, Lev Ratinov, and Dan Roth. 2012. Structured learning with constrained conditional models. Machine learning, 88(3):399-431.
10. Kuzman Ganchev, Joao Graca, Jennifer Gillenwater, and Ben Taskar. 2010. Posterior regularization for structured latent variable models. Machine Learning, 11:2001-2049.
11. Debanjan Ghosh, Smaranda Muresan, NinaWacholder, Mark Aakhus, and Matthew Mitsui. 2014. Analyzing argumentative discourse units in online interactions. In ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining.
12. Kazi Saidul Hasan and Vincent Ng. 2013. Stance classification of ideological debates: Data, models, features, and constraints. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.
13. Kazi Saidul Hasan and Vincent Ng. 2014. Why are you taking this stance? Identifying and classifying reasons in ideological debates. In EMNLP.
14. Y. Lu, H. Wang, C. Zhai, and D. Roth. 2012. Unsupervised discovery of opposing opinion networks from forum discussions. In CIKM.
15. Gideon S Mann and Andrew McCallum. 2010. Generalized expectation criteria for semi-supervised learning with weakly labeled data. Machine Learning, 11:955-984.
16. Akiko Murakami and Rudy Raymond. 2010. Support or Oppose? Classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In ACL.
17. Matthew Richardson and Pedro Domingos. 2006. Markov logic networks. Machine learning, 62(1-2).
18. Swapna Somasundaran and Janyce Wiebe. 2009. Recognizing stances in online debates. In ACL and AFNLP.
19. Swapna Somasundaran and Janyce Wiebe. 2010. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text.
20. Dhanya Sridhar, Lise Getoor, and Marilyn Walker. 2014. Collective stance classification of posts in online debate forums. In ACL Joint Workshop on Social Dynamics and Personal Attributes in Social Media.
21. Matt Thomas, Bo Pang, and Lillian Lee. 2006. Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts. In EMNLP.
22. Marilyn Walker, Pranav Anand, Rob Abbott, Jean E. Fox Tree, Craig Martell, and Joseph King. 2012a. Thats your evidence?: Classifying stance in online political debate. Decision Support Sciences.
23. Marilyn Walker, Pranav Anand, Robert Abbott, and Jean E. Fox Tree. 2012b. A corpus for research on deliberation and debate. In LREC.
24. Marilyn Walker, Pranav Anand, Robert Abbott, and Richard Grant. 2012c. Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion. In NAACL.
25. Lu Wang and Claire Cardie. 2014. A piece of my mind: A sentiment analysis approach for online dispute detection. In ACL