Back up your Stance: Recognizing Arguments in Online Discussions

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 29-38

  Boltuzic, Filip ^a   Snajder, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

BACK UP; F1 SCORES; MODEL-BASED OPC; MODELING PERFORMANCE; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS; OPINION MINING; POORLY WORDED; PROBLEM FORMULATION;

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 85121776136     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Kevin D. Ashley and Vern R. Walker. 2013. From information retrieval (ir) to argument retrieval (ar) for legal cases: Report on a baseline study. In JURIX, pages 29-38.
2. Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, David Burkett, and Dan Klein. 2012. An empirical investigation of statistical significance in nlp. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, EMNLP-CoNLL '12, pages 995-1005, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Elena Cabrio and Serena Villata. 2012. Combining textual entailment and argumentation theory for supporting online debates interactions. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 208-212, Jeju Island, Korea, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Alexander Conrad, Janyce Wiebe, Hwa, and Rebecca. 2012. Recognizing arguing subjectivity and argument tags. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics, ExProM '12, pages 80-88, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Koby Crammer and Yoram Singer. 2002. On the algorithmic implementation of multiclass kernel-based vector machines. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2:265-292, March.
6. Marie-Catherine De Marneffe, Bill Maccartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In In Proc. Intl Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC, pages 449-454.
7. B. Efron and R.J. Tibshirani. 1994. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability. Taylor & Francis.
8. Rong-En Fan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Xiang-Rui Wang, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. Liblinear: A library for large linear classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9:1871-1874, June.
9. Vanessa Wei Feng and Graeme Hirst. 2011. Classifying arguments by scheme. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 1, HLT '11, pages 987-996, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Jennifer L. Hochschild and Michael Danielson, 1998. Can We Desegregate Public Schools and Subsidized Housing? Lessons from the Sorry History of Yonkers, New York, chapter 2, pages 23-44. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence KS, edited by clarence stone edition.
11. Chih-Wei Hsu and Chih-Jen Lin. 2002. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. Trans. Neur. Netw., 13(2):415-425, March.
12. S. Sathiya Keerthi, S. Sundararajan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. A sequential dual method for large scale multi-class linear svms. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '08, pages 408-416, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
13. Jeffrey S. Lubbers. 2006. A Guide to Federal Agency Rulemaking. American Bar Association Chicago, 4th ed. edition.
14. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, 19(2):313-330.
15. Raquel Mochales and Marie-Francine Moens. 2008. Study on the structure of argumentation in case law. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference, pages 11-20, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands. IOS Press.
16. Marie-Francine Moens, Erik Boiy, Raquel Mochales Palau, and Chris Reed. 2007. Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL '07, pages 225-230, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
17. Tim O'Keefe and Irena Koprinska. 2009. Feature selection and weighting methods in sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Document Computing Symposium.
18. Raquel Mochales Palau and Marie-Francine Moens. 2009. Argumentation mining: The detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL '09, pages 98-107, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
19. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 2(1-2):1-135, January.
20. Joonsuk Park, Sally Klingel, Claire Cardie, Mary Newhart, Cynthia Farina, and Joan-Josep Vallbé. 2012. Facilitative moderation for online participation in erulemaking. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, dg.o '12, pages 173-182, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
21. John L. Pollock. 1987. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11:481-518.
22. Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson, and Geoffrey Leech. 2001. Grammatical word class variation within the british national corpus sampler. Language and Computers.
23. Raquel Mochales Palau Rowe Glenn Reed, Chris and Marie-Francine Moens. 2008. Language resources for studying argument. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on language resources and evaluation -LREC 2008, pages 91-100. ELRA.
24. Ellen Riloff and Jay Shoen. 1995. Automatically acquiring conceptual patterns without an annotated corpus. In In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 148-161.
25. Sara Rosenthal and Kathleen McKeown. 2012. Detecting opinionated claims in online discussions. In ICSC, pages 30-37.
26. Swapna Somasundaran and Janyce Wiebe. 2010. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, CAAGET '10, pages 116-124, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. Swapna Somasundaran, Josef Ruppenhofer, and Janyce Wiebe. 2007. Detecting arguing and sentiment in meetings. In Proceedings of the SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue.
28. Stephen E. Toulmin, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik. 1979. An Introduction to Reasoning. Macmillan Publishing Company.
29. S.E. Toulmin. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
30. Maria Paz Garcia Villalba and Patrick Saint-Dizier. 2012. Some facets of argument mining for opinion analysis. In COMMA, pages 23-34.
31. JanyceWiebe and Ellen Riloff. 2005. Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. In In CICLing2005, pages 486-497.
32. Theresa Wilson and Janyce Wiebe. 2005. Annotating attributions and private states. In Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the Sky.
33. Theresa Wilson. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In In Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP, pages 347-354.
34. AdamWyner, Raquel Mochales-Palau, Marie-Francine Moens, and David Milward. 2010. Semantic processing of legal texts. chapter Approaches to Text Mining Arguments from Legal Cases, pages 60-79. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.