Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion

NAACL HLT 2012 - 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 592-596

  Walker, Marilyn A ^a   Anand, Pranav ^a   Abbott, Robert ^a   Grant, Ricky ^a  

^a University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; PROPERTY; PUBLIC DEBATE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84907316440     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. R. Agrawal, S. Rajagopalan, R. Srikant, and Y. Xu. 2003. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference onWorldWideWeb, pages 529-535. ACM.
2. A. Balahur, Z. Kozareva, and A. Montoyo. 2009. Determining the polarity and source of opinions expressed in political debates. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 468-480.
3. M. Bansal, C. Cardie, and L. Lee. 2008. The power of negative thinking: Exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. Proceedings of COLING: Companion volume: Posters, pages 13-16.
4. O. Biran and O. Rambow. 2011. Identifying justifications in written dialogs. In 2011 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pages 162-168. IEEE.
5. C. Burfoot, S. Bird, and T. Baldwin. 2011. Collective classification of congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, pages 1506-1515. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. S. Chaiken. 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39(5):752.
7. Robert B. Cialdini. 2000. Influence: Science and Practice (4th Edition). Allyn & Bacon.
8. M.F. Davies. 1998. Dogmatism and belief formation: Output interference in the processing of supporting and contradictory cognitions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(2):456.
9. R. Malouf and T. Mullen. 2008. Taking sides: User classification for informal online political discourse. Internet Research, 18(2):177-190.
10. A. Murakami and R. Raymond. 2010. Support or Oppose? Classifying Positions in Online Debates from Reply Activities and Opinion Expressions. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pages 869-875. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. J. W. Pennebaker, L. E. Francis, and R. J. Booth, 2001. LIWC: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.
12. Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo. 1988. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1):69-81.
13. R.E. Petty, J.T. Cacioppo, and R. Goldman. 1981. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5):847.
14. S. Somasundaran and J. Wiebe. 2009. Recognizing stances in online debates. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1-Volume 1, pages 226-234. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. S. Somasundaran and J. Wiebe. 2010. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pages 116-124. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. M. Thomas, B. Pang, and L. Lee. 2006. Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 327-335. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. M. Walker, P. Anand, J. Fox Tree, R. Abbott, and J. King. 2012. A corpus for research on deliberation and debate. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012, Istanbul, Turkey, May 23-25, 2012.
18. Y.C. Wang and C.P. Rosé. 2010. Making conversational structure explicit: identification of initiation-response pairs within online discussions. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 673-676. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. A. Yessenalina, Y. Yue, and C. Cardie. 2010. Multilevel structured models for document-level sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1046-1056. Association for Computational Linguistics.