Benchmarks for Higgs effective theory: extended Higgs sectors

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Gorbahn, Martin ^a   No, Jose Miguel ^b   Sanz, Verónica ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Effective field theories; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943595212     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2015)036     Document Type: Article

References (151)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 508 [INSPIRE].
4. P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields, Phys. Lett.12 (1964) 132 [INSPIRE].
5. P.W. Higgs, Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons, Phys. Rev.145 (1966) 1156 [INSPIRE].
6. S. Weinberg, A model of leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett.19 (1967) 1264 [INSPIRE].
7. C.J.C. Burges and H.J. Schnitzer, Virtual effects of excited quarks as probes of a possible new hadronic mass scale, Nucl. Phys.B 228 (1983) 464 [INSPIRE].
8. C.N. Leung, S.T. Love and S. Rao, Low-energy manifestations of a new interaction scale: operator analysis, Z. Phys.C 31 (1986) 433 [INSPIRE].
9. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
10. K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Low-energy effects of new interactions in the electroweak boson sector, Phys. Rev.D 48 (1993) 2182 [INSPIRE].
11. G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
12. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
13. T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Constraining anomalous Higgs interactions, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 075013 [arXiv:1207.1344] [INSPIRE].
14. J.R. Espinosa, C. Grojean, V. Sanz and M. Trott, NSUSY fits, JHEP12 (2012) 077 [arXiv:1207.7355] [INSPIRE].
15. E. Massó and V. Sanz, Limits on anomalous couplings of the Higgs boson to electroweak gauge bosons from LEP and the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 033001 [arXiv:1211.1320] [INSPIRE].
16. T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Robust determination of the Higgs couplings: power to the data, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 015022 [arXiv:1211.4580] [INSPIRE].
17. B. Dumont, S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, A Bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators, JHEP07 (2013) 065 [arXiv:1304.3369] [INSPIRE].
18. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics, JHEP01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
19. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, Complete Higgs sector constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP07 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1404.3667] [INSPIRE].
20. R.S. Gupta, A. Pomarol and F. Riva, BSM primary effects, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035001 [arXiv:1405.0181] [INSPIRE].
21. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, The effective Standard Model after LHC Run I, JHEP03 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1410.7703] [INSPIRE].
22. A. Biekötter, A. Knochel, M. Krämer, D. Liu and F. Riva, Vices and virtues of Higgs effective field theories at large energy, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 055029 [arXiv:1406.7320] [INSPIRE].
23. C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, Effective theories and measurements at colliders, Phys. Lett.B 740 (2015) 8 [arXiv:1408.5147] [INSPIRE].
24. S. Willenbrock and C. Zhang, Effective field theory beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.64 (2014) 83 [arXiv:1401.0470] [INSPIRE].
25. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE].
26. A. Alloul, B. Fuks and V. Sanz, Phenomenology of the Higgs effective Lagrangian via FEYNRULES, JHEP04 (2014) 110 [arXiv:1310.5150] [INSPIRE].
27. M. Gorbahn, J.M. No and V. Sanz, in preparation.
28. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
29. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators I: formalism and λ dependence, JHEP10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
30. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, JHEP01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
31. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, JHEP04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
32. J. de Blas, M. Chala, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable effects of general new scalar particles, JHEP04 (2015) 078 [arXiv:1412.8480] [INSPIRE].
33. A.J. Buras, Weak Hamiltonian, CP-violation and rare decays, hep-ph/9806471 [INSPIRE].
34. M. Gorbahn, S. Jager, U. Nierste and S. Trine, The supersymmetric Higgs sector and (Formula presented.) mixing for large tan β, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 034030 [arXiv:0901.2065] [INSPIRE].
35. O. Lebedev, On stability of the electroweak vacuum and the Higgs portal, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2058 [arXiv:1203.0156] [INSPIRE].
36. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee and A. Strumia, Stabilization of the electroweak vacuum by a scalar threshold effect, JHEP06 (2012) 031 [arXiv:1203.0237] [INSPIRE].
37. R. Schabinger and J.D. Wells, A minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev.D 72 (2005) 093007 [hep-ph/0509209] [INSPIRE].
38. B. Patt and F. Wilczek, Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, hep-ph/0605188 [INSPIRE].
39. V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett.B 161 (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
40. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
41. D. O’Connell, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and M.B. Wise, Minimal extension of the Standard Model scalar sector, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 037701 [hep-ph/0611014] [INSPIRE].
42. G.W. Anderson and L.J. Hall, The electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis, Phys. Rev.D 45 (1992) 2685 [INSPIRE].
43. J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, The electroweak phase transition with a singlet, Phys. Lett.B 305 (1993) 98 [hep-ph/9301285] [INSPIRE].
44. S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP08 (2007) 010 [arXiv:0705.2425] [INSPIRE].
45. J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and M. Quirós, Some cosmological implications of hidden sectors, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 123528 [arXiv:0809.3215] [INSPIRE].
46. J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin and F. Riva, Strong electroweak phase transitions in the Standard Model with a singlet, Nucl. Phys.B 854 (2012) 592 [arXiv:1107.5441] [INSPIRE].
47. S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, C.L. Wainwright and P. Winslow, Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035018 [arXiv:1407.5342] [INSPIRE].
48. A. Farzinnia and J. Ren, Strongly first-order electroweak phase transition and classical scale invariance, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 075012 [arXiv:1408.3533] [INSPIRE].
49. D. Curtin, P. Meade and C.-T. Yu, Testing electroweak baryogenesis with future colliders, JHEP11 (2014) 127 [arXiv:1409.0005] [INSPIRE].
50. V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, LHC phenomenology of an extended Standard Model with a real scalar singlet, Phys. Rev.D 77 (2008) 035005 [arXiv:0706.4311] [INSPIRE].
51. M.J. Dolan, C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, New physics in LHC Higgs boson pair production, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 055002 [arXiv:1210.8166] [INSPIRE].
52. J.M. No and M. Ramsey-Musolf, Probing the Higgs portal at the LHC through resonant di-Higgs production, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 095031 [arXiv:1310.6035] [INSPIRE].
53. 2/v, arXiv:1401.0935 [INSPIRE].
54. G.M. Pruna and T. Robens, Higgs singlet extension parameter space in the light of the LHC discovery, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 115012 [arXiv:1303.1150] [INSPIRE].
55. T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, Status of the Higgs singlet extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 104 [arXiv:1501.02234] [INSPIRE].
56. V. Martín Lozano, J.M. Moreno and C.B. Park, Resonant Higgs boson pair production in the (Formula presented.) decay channel, JHEP08 (2015) 004 [arXiv:1501.03799] [INSPIRE].
57. A. Falkowski, C. Gross and O. Lebedev, A second Higgs from the Higgs portal, JHEP05 (2015) 057 [arXiv:1502.01361] [INSPIRE].
58. M. Gouzevitch, A. Oliveira, J. Rojo, R. Rosenfeld, G.P. Salam and V. Sanz, Scale-invariant resonance tagging in multijet events and new physics in Higgs pair production, JHEP07 (2013) 148 [arXiv:1303.6636] [INSPIRE].
59. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and I.M. Lewis, Exploring resonant di-Higgs boson production in the Higgs singlet model, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035015 [arXiv:1410.5488] [INSPIRE].
60. N. Craig, C. Englert and M. McCullough, New probe of naturalness, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 121803 [arXiv:1305.5251] [INSPIRE].
61. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 112015 [arXiv:1408.7084] [INSPIRE].
62. CMS collaboration, Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3076 [arXiv:1407.0558] [INSPIRE].
63. ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson production and couplings in the four-lepton channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 012006 [arXiv:1408.5191] [INSPIRE].
64. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 092007 [arXiv:1312.5353] [INSPIRE].
65. −1of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-030, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
66. CMS collaboration, Measurement of Higgs boson production and properties in the W W decay channel with leptonic final states, JHEP01 (2014) 096 [arXiv:1312.1129] [INSPIRE].
67. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the bb decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson in associated W/ZH production with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-079, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
68. CMS collaboration, Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson produced in association with a W or a Z boson and decaying to bottom quarks,Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 012003 [arXiv:1310.3687] [INSPIRE].
69. −final state with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-108, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
70. CMS collaboration, Evidence for the 125 GeV Higgs boson decaying to a pair of τ leptons, JHEP05 (2014) 104 [arXiv:1401.5041] [INSPIRE].
71. CMS collaboration, Projected performance of an upgraded CMS detector at the LHC and HL-LHC: contribution to the Snowmass process, arXiv:1307.7135 [INSPIRE].
72. Gfitter Group collaboration, M. Baak et al., The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3046 [arXiv:1407.3792] [INSPIRE].
73. K. Hagiwara, S. Matsumoto, D. Haidt and C.S. Kim, A novel approach to confront electroweak data and theory, Z. Phys.C 64 (1994) 559 [Erratum C 68 (1995) 352] [hep-ph/9409380] [INSPIRE].
74. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Possible futures of electroweak precision: ILC, FCC-ee and CEPC, arXiv:1411.1054 [INSPIRE].
75. TLEP Design Study Working Group collaboration, M. Bicer et al., First look at the physics case of TLEP, JHEP01 (2014) 164 [arXiv:1308.6176] [INSPIRE].
76. thTLEP workshop, http://indico.cern.ch/event/257713/session/1/contribution/30, CERN, Geneva Switzerland October 16 2013.
77. D.M. Asner et al., ILC Higgs white paper, arXiv:1310.0763 [INSPIRE].
78. B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, What do precision Higgs measurements buy us?, arXiv:1404.1058 [INSPIRE].
79. J. Elias-Miró, C. Grojean, R.S. Gupta and D. Marzocca, Scaling and tuning of EW and Higgs observables, JHEP05 (2014) 019 [arXiv:1312.2928] [INSPIRE].
80. CMS collaboration, Search for a Standard Model like Higgs boson in the decay channelH→ZZ→ℓ+ℓ−qq¯$$ H\to ZZ\to {\ell}^{+}{\ell}^{-}q\overline{q} $$at CMS,CMS-PAS-HIG-12-024, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
81. CMS collaboration, Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the H → W W → ℓνjj decay channel in pp collisions at the LHC, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-027, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
82. C. Grojean, G. Servant and J.D. Wells, First-order electroweak phase transition in the Standard Model with a low cutoff, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 036001 [hep-ph/0407019] [INSPIRE].
83. D. Bödeker, L. Fromme, S.J. Huber and M. Seniuch, The baryon asymmetry in the Standard Model with a low cut-off, JHEP02 (2005) 026 [hep-ph/0412366] [INSPIRE].
84. C. Delaunay, C. Grojean and J.D. Wells, Dynamics of non-renormalizable electroweak symmetry breaking, JHEP04 (2008) 029 [arXiv:0711.2511] [INSPIRE].
85. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept.459 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503173] [INSPIRE].
86. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie and A.M. Teixeira, The next-to-minimal supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rept.496 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0910.1785] [INSPIRE].
87. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall and V.S. Rychkov, Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: an alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 015007 [hep-ph/0603188] [INSPIRE].
88. L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J.F. Oliver and M.H.G. Tytgat, The inert doublet model: an archetype for dark matter, JCAP02 (2007) 028 [hep-ph/0612275] [INSPIRE].
89. E.M. Dolle and S. Su, The inert dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 055012 [arXiv:0906.1609] [INSPIRE].
90. E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].
91. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura and O. Seto, Neutrino mass, dark matter and baryon asymmetry via TeV-scale physics without fine-tuning, Phys. Rev. Lett.102 (2009) 051805 [arXiv:0807.0361] [INSPIRE].
92. M. Gustafsson, J.M. No and M.A. Rivera, Predictive model for radiatively induced neutrino masses and mixings with dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 211802 [Erratum 112 (2014) 259902] [arXiv:1212.4806] [INSPIRE].
93. G.C. Branco, P.M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M.N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J.P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept.516 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1106.0034] [INSPIRE].
94. A. Celis, V. Ilisie and A. Pich, LHC constraints on two-Higgs doublet models, JHEP07 (2013) 053 [arXiv:1302.4022] [INSPIRE].
95. 2symmetry in light of new LHC data, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.447 (2013) 012050 [arXiv:1303.7102] [INSPIRE].
96. B. Grinstein and P. Uttayarat, Carving out parameter space in type-II two Higgs doublets model, JHEP06 (2013) 094 [Erratum 09 (2013) 110] [arXiv:1304.0028] [INSPIRE].
97. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and M. Sher, Heavy Higgs searches and constraints on two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 015018 [Erratum D 88 (2013) 039901] [arXiv:1305.1624] [INSPIRE].
98. O. Eberhardt, U. Nierste and M. Wiebusch, Status of the two-Higgs-doublet model of type-II, JHEP07 (2013) 118 [arXiv:1305.1649] [INSPIRE].
99. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J.F. Gunion and S. Kraml, Global fit to Higgs signal strengths and couplings and implications for extended Higgs sectors, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 075008 [arXiv:1306.2941] [INSPIRE].
100. K. Cheung, J.S. Lee and P.-Y. Tseng, Higgcision in the two-Higgs doublet models, JHEP01 (2014) 085 [arXiv:1310.3937] [INSPIRE].
101. B. Dumont, J.F. Gunion, Y. Jiang and S. Kraml, Constraints on and future prospects for two-Higgs-doublet models in light of the LHC Higgs signal, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 035021 [arXiv:1405.3584] [INSPIRE].
102. S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura, K. Yagyu and H. Yokoya, Fingerprinting nonminimal Higgs sectors, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 075001 [arXiv:1406.3294] [INSPIRE].
103. J.M. Cline and P.-A. Lemieux, Electroweak phase transition in two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Rev.D 55 (1997) 3873 [hep-ph/9609240] [INSPIRE].
104. S. Kanemura, Y. Okada and E. Senaha, Electroweak baryogenesis and quantum corrections to the triple Higgs boson coupling, Phys. Lett.B 606 (2005) 361 [hep-ph/0411354] [INSPIRE].
105. L. Fromme, S.J. Huber and M. Seniuch, Baryogenesis in the two-Higgs doublet model, JHEP11 (2006) 038 [hep-ph/0605242] [INSPIRE].
106. G.C. Dorsch, S.J. Huber and J.M. No, A strong electroweak phase transition in the 2HDM after LHC8, JHEP10 (2013) 029 [arXiv:1305.6610] [INSPIRE].
107. S. Kanemura, S. Moretti, Y. Mukai, R. Santos and K. Yagyu, Distinctive Higgs signals of a type II 2HDM at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 79 (2009) 055017 [arXiv:0901.0204] [INSPIRE].
108. N. Craig, J. Galloway and S. Thomas, Searching for signs of the second Higgs doublet, arXiv:1305.2424 [INSPIRE].
109. J. Baglio, O. Eberhardt, U. Nierste and M. Wiebusch, Benchmarks for Higgs pair production and heavy Higgs boson searches in the two-Higgs-doublet model of type II, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 015008 [arXiv:1403.1264] [INSPIRE].
110. B. Coleppa, F. Kling and S. Su, Exotic decays of a heavy neutral Higgs through HZ/AZ channel, JHEP09 (2014) 161 [arXiv:1404.1922] [INSPIRE].
111. 0, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 211802 [arXiv:1405.5537] [INSPIRE].
112. B. Hespel, D. Lopez-Val and E. Vryonidou, Higgs pair production via gluon fusion in the two-Higgs-doublet model, JHEP09 (2014) 124 [arXiv:1407.0281] [INSPIRE].
113. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori and G.D. Kribs, A minimal flavor violating 2HDM at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 115009 [arXiv:1210.2465] [INSPIRE].
114. S.L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Natural conservation laws for neutral currents, Phys. Rev.D 15 (1977) 1958 [INSPIRE].
115. C. Englert et al., Precision measurements of Higgs couplings: implications for new physics scales, J. Phys.G 41 (2014) 113001 [arXiv:1403.7191] [INSPIRE].
116. J.F. Gunion and H.E. Haber, The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: the approach to the decoupling limit, Phys. Rev.D 67 (2003) 075019 [hep-ph/0207010] [INSPIRE].
117. M. Carena, I. Low, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, Impersonating the Standard Model Higgs boson: alignment without decoupling, JHEP04 (2014) 015 [arXiv:1310.2248] [INSPIRE].
118. W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O.M. Ogreid and P. Osland, The oblique parameters in multi-Higgs-doublet models, Nucl. Phys.B 801 (2008) 81 [arXiv:0802.4353] [INSPIRE].
119. G. Altarelli and R. Barbieri, Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes, Phys. Lett.B 253 (1991) 161 [INSPIRE].
120. G. Altarelli, R. Barbieri and S. Jadach, Toward a model independent analysis of electroweak data, Nucl. Phys.B 369 (1992) 3 [Erratum B 376 (1992) 444] [INSPIRE].
121. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys.B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
122. J. Hirn and V. Sanz, (Not) summing over Kaluza-Kleins, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 044022 [hep-ph/0702005] [INSPIRE].
123. J. Hirn and V. Sanz, A negative S parameter from holographic technicolor, Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006) 121803 [hep-ph/0606086] [INSPIRE].
124. J. Hirn and V. Sanz, The fifth dimension as an analogue computer for strong interactions at the LHC, JHEP03 (2007) 100 [hep-ph/0612239] [INSPIRE].
125. C. Csáki, J. Hubisz and S.J. Lee, Radion phenomenology in realistic warped space models, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 125015 [arXiv:0705.3844] [INSPIRE].
126. H.M. Lee, M. Park and V. Sanz, Gravity-mediated (or composite) dark matter, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2715 [arXiv:1306.4107] [INSPIRE].
127. H.M. Lee, M. Park and V. Sanz, Gravity-mediated (or composite) dark matter confronts astrophysical data, JHEP05 (2014) 063 [arXiv:1401.5301] [INSPIRE].
128. W.D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein and W. Skiba, Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 111802 [arXiv:0708.1463] [INSPIRE].
129. W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise, Modulus stabilization with bulk fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 4922 [hep-ph/9907447] [INSPIRE].
130. W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise, Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus, Phys. Lett.B 475 (2000) 275 [hep-ph/9911457] [INSPIRE].
131. C. Csáki, M.L. Graesser and G.D. Kribs, Radion dynamics and electroweak physics, Phys. Rev.D 63 (2001) 065002 [hep-th/0008151] [INSPIRE].
132. J.F. Gunion, M. Toharia and J.D. Wells, Precision electroweak data and the mixed radion-Higgs sector of warped extra dimensions, Phys. Lett.B 585 (2004) 295 [hep-ph/0311219] [INSPIRE].
133. J. Ellis, D.S. Hwang, V. Sanz and T. You, A fast track towards the ‘Higgs’ spin and parity, JHEP11 (2012) 134 [arXiv:1208.6002] [INSPIRE].
134. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, Associated production evidence against Higgs impostors and anomalous couplings, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2507 [arXiv:1303.0208] [INSPIRE].
135. J.M. Campbell, W/Z + B,B¯$$ \overline{B} $$/jets at NLO using the Monte Carlo MCFM, hep-ph/0105226 [INSPIRE].
136. R.K. Ellis, An update on the next-to-leading order Monte Carlo MCFM, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.160 (2006) 170 [INSPIRE].
137. J.M. Campbell and R.K. Ellis, MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.205-206 (2010) 10 [arXiv:1007.3492] [INSPIRE].
138. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Vector boson pair production at the LHC, JHEP07 (2011) 018 [arXiv:1105.0020] [INSPIRE].
139. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, R. Frederix, P. Nason, C. Oleari and C. Williams, NLO Higgs boson production plus one and two jets using the POWHEG BOX, MadGraph4 and MCFM, JHEP07 (2012) 092 [arXiv:1202.5475] [INSPIRE].
140. E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich and A. Vicini, Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM, JHEP02 (2012) 088 [arXiv:1111.2854] [INSPIRE].
141. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
142. A. Alloul, B. Fuks and V. Sanz, Phenomenology of the Higgs effective Lagrangian via FEYNRULES, JHEP04 (2014) 110 [arXiv:1310.5150] [INSPIRE].
143. N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules — Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].
144. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter, UFO — the Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].
145. A. Djouadi, R.M. Godbole, B. Mellado and K. Mohan, Probing the spin-parity of the Higgs boson via jet kinematics in vector boson fusion, Phys. Lett.B 723 (2013) 307 [arXiv:1301.4965] [INSPIRE].
146. R. Edezhath, Dimension-6 operator constraints from boosted VBF Higgs, arXiv:1501.00992 [INSPIRE].
147. G. Brooijmans et al., Les Houches 2013: physics at TeV colliders — new physics working group report, arXiv:1405.1617 [INSPIRE].
148. S. Kanemura, T. Kubota and H.-A. Tohyama, Generalized screening theorem for Higgs decay processes in the two doublet model, Nucl. Phys.B 483 (1997) 111 [Erratum B 506 (1997) 548] [hep-ph/9604381] [INSPIRE].
149. −, Nucl. Phys.B 282 (1987) 253 [INSPIRE].
150. A. De Rujula, M.B. Gavela, P. Hernández and E. Masso, The selfcouplings of vector bosons: does LEP-1 obviate LEP-2?, Nucl. Phys.B 384 (1992) 3 [INSPIRE].
151. B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, How to use the Standard Model effective field theory, arXiv:1412.1837 [INSPIRE].