Scaling and tuning of EW and Higgs observables

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Elias Miró, Joan ^a   Grojean, Christophe ^a,b   Gupta, Rick S ^a   Marzocca, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^c SEZIONE DI TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics; Renormalization Group

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901399479     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2014)019     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1207.7214 ] [ INSPIRE ].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ arXiv:1207.7235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [ INSPIRE ].
4. S. Narison and R. Tarrach, Higher dimensional renormalization group invariant vacuum condensates in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 125 (1983) 217 [ INSPIRE ].
5. A.Y. Morozov, Matrix of mixing of scalar and vector mesons of dimension D ≤ 8 in QCD (in Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 40 (1984) 505 [Yad. Fiz. 40 (1984) 788] [ INSPIRE ].
6. K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Low-energy effects of new interactions in the electroweak boson sector, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2182 [ INSPIRE ].
7. K. Hagiwara, S. Matsumoto, D. Haidt and C.S. Kim, A novel approach to confront electroweak data and theory, Z. Phys. C 64 (1994) 559 [Erratum ibid. C 68 (1995) 352] [ hep-ph/9409380 ] [ INSPIRE ].
8. S. Alam, S. Dawson and R. Szalapski, Low-energy constraints on new physics revisited, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 1577 [ hep-ph/9706542 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. R. Barbieri, B. Bellazzini, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, The Higgs boson from an extended symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 115008 [ arXiv:0706.0432 ] [ INSPIRE ].
10. C. Grojean, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group scaling of Higgs operators and Γ(h → γγ), JHEP 04 (2013) 016 [ arXiv:1301.2588 ] [ INSPIRE ].
11. J. Elias-Miró, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Renormalization of dimension-six operators relevant for the Higgs decays h → γγ, γZ, JHEP 08 (2013) 033 [ arXiv:1302.5661 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP 11 (2013) 066 [ arXiv:1308.1879 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators I: formalism and λ dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [ arXiv:1308.2627 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [ arXiv:1310.4838 ] [ INSPIRE ].
15. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [ arXiv:1008.4884 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP 07 (2013) 035 [ arXiv:1303.3876 ] [ INSPIRE ].
17. B. Dumont, S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, A Bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators, JHEP 07 (2013) 065 [ arXiv:1304.3369 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics, JHEP 01 (2014)151 [ arXiv:1308.2803 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. A. De Rujula, M.B. Gavela, P. Hernández and E. Masso, The selfcouplings of vector bosons: does LEP-1 obviate LEP-2?, Nucl. Phys. B 384 (1992) 3 [ INSPIRE ].
20. H. Mebane, N. Greiner, C. Zhang and S. Willenbrock, Constraints on electroweak effective operators at one loop, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015028 [ arXiv:1306.3380 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and C. Zhang, Electroweak effective operators and Higgs physics, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015016 [ arXiv:1311.3107 ] [ INSPIRE ].
22. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127 [ hep-ph/0405040 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 39532672)
23. Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005)075009 [ hep-ph/0412166 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csáki, G. Marandella and A. Strumia, The minimal set of electroweak precision parameters, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 033011 [ hep-ph/0604111 ] [ INSPIRE ].
25. C. Grojean, E. Salvioni, M. Schlaffer and A. Weiler, Very boosted Higgs in gluon fusion, arXiv:1312.3317 [ INSPIRE ].
26. B. Grinstein and M.B. Wise, Operator analysis for precision electroweak physics, Phys. Lett. B 265 (1991) 326 [ INSPIRE ].
27. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP Electroweak collaboration, S. Schael et al., Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP, Phys. Rept. 532 (2013) 119 [ arXiv:1302.3415 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [ hep-ph/0703164 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. R. Barbieri and G.F. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [ INSPIRE ].
30. G. Gounaris et al., Triple gauge boson couplings, hep-ph/9601233 [ INSPIRE ].
31. M. Baak et al., The electroweak fit of the Standard Model after the discovery of a new boson at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2205 [ arXiv:1209.2716 ] [ INSPIRE ].
32. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak precision observables, new physics and the nature of a 126 GeV Higgs boson, JHEP 08 (2013) 106 [ arXiv:1306.4644 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. C. Grojean, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Panico, Light top partners and precision physics, JHEP 10 (2013)160 [ arXiv:1306.4655 ] [ INSPIRE ].
34. R. Contino, C. Grojean, D. Pappadopulo, R. Rattazzi and A. Thamm, Strong Higgs interactions at a linear collider, JHEP 02 (2014) 006 [ arXiv:1309.7038 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. S. Dawson et al., Higgs working group report of the Snowmass 2013 community planning study, arXiv:1310.8361 [ INSPIRE ].
36. H. Baer et al., The International Linear Collider technical design report - volume 2: physics, arXiv:1306.6352 [ INSPIRE ].
37. TLEP Design Study Working Group collaboration, M. Bicer et al., First look at the physics case of TLEP, JHEP 01 (2014) 164 [ arXiv:1308.6176 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. O. Domenech, A. Pomarol and J. Serra, Probing the SM with dijets at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 074030 [ arXiv:1201.6510 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. J. Serra, Probing the SM with dijets @ LHC, talk at Planck 2012, http://planck12.fuw.edu.pl/talks/serra.pdf, Warsaw Poland (2012).
40. E.H. Simmons and P.L. Cho, Anomalous gluon selfinteractions and tt′ production, hep-ph/9504401 [ INSPIRE ].
41. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, arXiv:1312.2014 [ INSPIRE ].
42. A. Pineda, Renormalization group improvement of the NRQCD Lagrangian and heavy quarkonium spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 074007 [ hep-ph/0109117 ] [ INSPIRE ].