Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Contino, Roberto ^a   Ghezzi, Margherita ^a   Grojean, Christophe ^b,c   Mühlleitner, Margarete ^d   Spira, Michael ^e  

^a UNIVERSITÀ DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c CERN   (Switzerland)

^d KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^e PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics; Technicolor and Composite Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881328590     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2013)035     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1207.7214 ] [ INSPIRE ].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ arXiv:1207.7235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1996).
4. G. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [ hep-ph/0703164 ] [ INSPIRE ].
5. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 183 [ INSPIRE ].
6. S. Dimopoulos and J. Preskill, Massless composites with massive constituents, Nucl. Phys. B 199 (1982) 206 [ INSPIRE ].
7. T. Banks, Constraints on SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Nucl. Phys. B 243 (1984) 125 [ INSPIRE ].
8. D.B. Kaplan, H. Georgi and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs Scalars, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 187 [ INSPIRE ].
9. H. Georgi, D.B. Kaplan and P. Galison, Calculation of the composite Higgs mass, Phys. Lett. B 143 (1984) 152 [ INSPIRE ].
10. H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Composite Higgs and Custodial SU(2), Phys. Lett. B 145 (1984) 216 [ INSPIRE ].
11. M.J. Dugan, H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Anatomy of a Composite Higgs Model, Nucl. Phys. B 254 (1985) 299 [ INSPIRE ].
12. R. Contino, Y. Nomura and A. Pomarol, Higgs as a holographic pseudoGoldstone boson, Nucl. Phys. B 671 (2003) 148 [ hep-ph/0306259 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 37244317)
13. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The Minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165 [ hep-ph/0412089 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 40854763)
14. A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski and M. Spira, HDECAY: A Program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56 [ hep-ph/9704448 ] [ INSPIRE ].
15. A. Djouadi, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Decays of supersymmetric particles: The Program SUSY-HIT (SUspect-SdecaY-HDECAY-InTerface), Acta Phys. Polon. B 38 (2007) 635 [ hep-ph/0609292 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M.M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, eHDECAY: an implementation of the Higgs effective Lagrangian into HDECAY, work in progress.
17. C. Burges and H.J. Schnitzer, Virtual effects of excited quarks as probes of a possible new hadronic mass scale, Nucl. Phys. B 228 (1983) 464 [ INSPIRE ].
18. C.N. Leung, S. Love and S. Rao, Low-Energy Manifestations of a New Interaction Scale: Operator Analysis, Z. Phys. C 31 (1986) 433 [ INSPIRE ].
19. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [ INSPIRE ].
20. R. Rattazzi, Anomalous interactions at the Z0 pole, Z. Phys. C 40 (1988) 605 [ INSPIRE ].
21. B. Grzadkowski, Z. Hioki, K. Ohkuma and J. Wudka, Probing anomalous top quark couplings induced by dimension-six operators at photon colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 689 (2004) 108 [ hep-ph/0310159 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 38728997)
22. P.J. Fox, Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, G. Perez and M.D. Schwartz, Deciphering top flavor violation at the LHC with B factories, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 054008 [ arXiv:0704.1482 ] [ INSPIRE ].
23. J. Aguilar-Saavedra, A Minimal set of top anomalous couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 812 (2009) 181 [ arXiv:0811.3842 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. J. Aguilar-Saavedra, A Minimal set of top-Higgs anomalous couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 821 (2009) 215 [ arXiv:0904.2387 ] [ INSPIRE ].
25. C. Grojean, W. Skiba and J. Terning, Disguising the oblique parameters, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 075008 [ hep-ph/0602154 ] [ INSPIRE ].
26. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [ arXiv:1008.4884 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127 [ hep-ph/0405040 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 39532672)
28. R. Barbieri, Electroweak precision tests: what do we learn?, CERN-TH-6659-92 (1992).
29. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [ INSPIRE ].
30. K. Agashe and R. Contino, Composite Higgs-Mediated FCNC, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 075016 [ arXiv:0906.1542 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. G. Isidori, Flavor physics and CP-violation, arXiv:1302.0661 [ INSPIRE ].
32. G. Isidori, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Flavor Physics Constraints for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 355 [ arXiv:1002.0900 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. P. Sikivie, L. Susskind, M.B. Voloshin and V.I. Zakharov, Isospin Breaking in Technicolor Models, Nucl. Phys. B 173 (1980) 189 [ INSPIRE ].
34. G. Altarelli and R. Barbieri, Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes, Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 161 [ INSPIRE ].
35. G. Altarelli, R. Barbieri and S. Jadach, Toward a model independent analysis of electroweak data, Nucl. Phys. B 369 (1992) 3 [Erratum ibid. B 376 (1992) 444] [ INSPIRE ].
36. M. Baak et al., The Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model after the Discovery of a New Boson at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2205 [ arXiv:1209.2716 ] [ INSPIRE ].
37. M. Redi and A. Weiler, Flavor and CP Invariant Composite Higgs Models, JHEP 11 (2011) 108 [ arXiv:1106.6357 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. N. Vignaroli, ΔF = 1 constraints on composite Higgs models with LR parity, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115011 [ arXiv:1204.0478 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics, Annals Phys. 318 (2005) 119 [ hep-ph/0504231 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 40829794)
40. P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, The SUSY CP Problem and the MFV Principle, Phys. Lett. B 684 (2010) 147 [ arXiv:0906.4551 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. J.F. Kamenik, M. Papucci and A. Weiler, Constraining the dipole moments of the top quark, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 071501 [ arXiv:1107.3143 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. J. Aguilar-Saavedra, N. Castro and A. Onofre, Constraints on the Wtb vertex from early LHC data, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 117301 [ arXiv:1105.0117 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [ INSPIRE ].
44. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the Hadronic Contributions to the Muon g-2 and to alpha(MZ), Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1515 [Erratum ibid. C 72 (2012) 1874] [ arXiv:1010.4180 ] [ INSPIRE ].
45. D. Hanneke, S.F. Hoogerheide and G. Gabrielse, Cavity Control of a Single-Electron Quantum Cyclotron: Measuring the Electron Magnetic Moment, arXiv:1009.4831 [ INSPIRE ].
46. G. Giudice, P. Paradisi and M. Passera, Testing new physics with the electron g-2, JHEP 11 (2012) 113 [ arXiv:1208.6583 ] [ INSPIRE ].
47. Muon (g-2) collaboration, G. Bennett et al., An Improved Limit on the Muon Electric Dipole Moment, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 052008 [ arXiv:0811.1207 ] [ INSPIRE ].
48. J. Hudson, D. Kara, I. Smallman, B. Sauer, M. Tarbutt and E. A. Hinds, Improved measurement of the shape of the electron, Nature 473 (2011) 493 [ INSPIRE ].
49. D. Kara, I. Smallman, J. Hudson, B. Sauer, M. Tarbutt and E. A. Hinds, Measurement of the electron's electric dipole moment using YbF molecules: methods and data analysis, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 103051 [ arXiv:1208.4507 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. R. Rattazzi, Effective Lagrangian for a strongly-interacting light Higgs, talk given at the workshop Physics at LHC: from Experiment to Theory, Princeton University, Princeton, U.S.A., 21-24 March 2007 [ http://indico.cern.ch/ getFile.py/access?contribId=29&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId= 13975 ].
51. R. Contino, C. Grojean, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini and R. Rattazzi, Strong Double Higgs Production at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2010) 089 [ arXiv:1002.1011 ] [ INSPIRE ].
52. R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 055014 [ hep-ph/0612048 ] [ INSPIRE ].
53. S. Choi,. Miller, D.J., M. Muhlleitner and P. Zerwas, Identifying the Higgs spin and parity in decays to Z pairs, Phys. Lett. B 553 (2003) 61 [ hep-ph/0210077 ] [ INSPIRE ].
54. A. De Rujula, J. Lykken, M. Pierini, C. Rogan and M. Spiropulu, Higgs look-alikes at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 013003 [ arXiv:1001.5300 ] [ INSPIRE ].
55. S. Bolognesi, Y. Gao, A.V. Gritsan, K. Melnikov, M. Schulze, N. V. Tran and A. Whitbeck, On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095031 [ arXiv:1208.4018 ] [ INSPIRE ].
56. A. Azatov, A. Falkowski, C. Grojean and E. Kuflik, Constraining the effective Higgs Lagrangian at higher order via h → V V, work in progress.
57. J.R. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson, Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 292 [ INSPIRE ].
58. M.A. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, M. Voloshin and V.I. Zakharov, Low-Energy Theorems for Higgs Boson Couplings to Photons, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30 (1979) 711 [ INSPIRE ].
59. B.A. Kniehl and M. Spira, Low-energy theorems in Higgs physics, Z. Phys. C 69 (1995) 77 [ hep-ph/9505225 ] [ INSPIRE ].
60. A. Falkowski, Pseudo-goldstone Higgs production via gluon fusion, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 055018 [ arXiv:0711.0828 ] [ INSPIRE ].
61. I. Low and A. Vichi, On the production of a composite Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 045019 [ arXiv:1010.2753 ] [ INSPIRE ].
62. A. Azatov and J. Galloway, Light Custodians and Higgs Physics in Composite Models, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 055013 [ arXiv:1110.5646 ] [ INSPIRE ].
63. M. Gillioz, R. Grober, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and E. Salvioni, Higgs Low-Energy Theorem (and its corrections) in Composite Models, JHEP 10 (2012) 004 [ arXiv:1206.7120 ] [ INSPIRE ].
64. M. Redi, Composite MFV and Beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2030 [ arXiv:1203.4220 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, D.M. Straub and A. Tesi, A 125 GeV composite Higgs boson versus flavour and electroweak precision tests, JHEP 05 (2013) 069 [ arXiv:1211.5085 ] [ INSPIRE ].
66. C. Degrande, J.-M. Gerard, C. Grojean, F. Maltoni and G. Servant, Non-resonant New Physics in Top Pair Production at Hadron Colliders, JHEP 03 (2011) 125 [ arXiv:1010.6304 ] [ INSPIRE ].
67. H. Hesari and M.M. Najafabadi, Probing the Anomalous Couplings of the Top Quark with Gluon at the LHC and Tevatron, arXiv:1207.0339 [ INSPIRE ].
68. C. Englert, A. Freitas, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, Constraining the Intrinsic Structure of Top-Quarks, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 261 [ arXiv:1210.2570 ] [ INSPIRE ].
69. C. Degrande, J. Gerard, C. Grojean, F. Maltoni and G. Servant, Probing Top-Higgs Non-Standard Interactions at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2012) 036 [Erratum ibid. 1303 (2013) 032] [ arXiv:1205.1065 ] [ INSPIRE ].
70. S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1., Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2239 [ INSPIRE ].
71. C.G. Callan Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2., Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2247 [ INSPIRE ].
72. C. Burgess and D. London, Light spin one particles imply gauge invariance, hep-ph/9203215 [ INSPIRE ].
73. A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway, Model-Independent Bounds on a Light Higgs, JHEP 04 (2012) 127 [Erratum ibid. 1304 (2013) 140] [ arXiv:1202.3415 ] [ INSPIRE ].
74. R. Alonso, M. Gavela, L. Merlo, S. Rigolin and J. Yepes, The Effective Chiral Lagrangian for a Light Dynamical 'Higgs', Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 330 [ arXiv:1212.3305 ] [ INSPIRE ].
75. R. Contino, C. Grojean, D. Pappadopulo, R. Rattazzi, A. Thamm, Strong Higgs interactions at a Linear Collider, work in progress.
76. G. Passarino, NLO Inspired Effective Lagrangians for Higgs Physics, Nucl. Phys. B 868 (2013) 416 [ arXiv:1209.5538 ] [ INSPIRE ].
77. S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A 96 (1979) 327 [ INSPIRE ].
78. C. Grojean, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Scaling of Higgs Operators and Γ(h → γγ), JHEP 04 (2013) 016 [ arXiv:1301.2588 ] [ INSPIRE ].
79. J. Elias-Miro, J. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Renormalization of dimension-six operators relevant for the Higgs decays h → γγ, γZ, arXiv:1302.5661 [ INSPIRE ].
80. R. Barbieri, B. Bellazzini, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, The Higgs boson from an extended symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 115008 [ arXiv:0706.0432 ] [ INSPIRE ].
81. A. Pomarol and J. Serra, Top Quark Compositeness: Feasibility and Implications, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 074026 [ arXiv:0806.3247 ] [ INSPIRE ].
82. S.L. Adler, J.C. Collins and A. Duncan, Energy-Momentum-Tensor Trace Anomaly in Spin 1/2 Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1712 [ INSPIRE ].
83. J.C. Collins, A. Duncan and S.D. Joglekar, Trace and Dilatation Anomalies in Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 438 [ INSPIRE ].
84. N. Nielsen, The Energy Momentum Tensor in a Nonabelian Quark Gluon Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 120 (1977) 212 [ INSPIRE ].
85. M. Farina, C. Grojean, F. Maltoni, E. Salvioni and A. Thamm, Lifting degeneracies in Higgs couplings using single top production in association with a Higgs boson, JHEP 05 (2013) 022 [ arXiv:1211.3736 ] [ INSPIRE ].
86. 3) and their connection to low-energy theorems, Nucl. Phys. B 510 (1998) 61 [ hep-ph/9708255 ] [ INSPIRE ].
87. M. Krämer, E. Laenen and M. Spira, Soft gluon radiation in Higgs boson production at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 511 (1998) 523 [ hep-ph/9611272 ] [ INSPIRE ].
88. Y. Schröder and M. Steinhauser, Four-loop decoupling relations for the strong coupling, JHEP 01 (2006) 051 [ hep-ph/0512058 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 43498830)
89. K. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kuhn and C. Sturm, QCD decoupling at four loops, Nucl. Phys. B 744 (2006) 121 [ hep-ph/0512060 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 44382327)
90. T. Inami, T. Kubota and Y. Okada, Effective gauge theory and the effect of heavy quarks in Higgs boson decays, Z. Phys. C 18 (1983) 69 [ INSPIRE ].
91. A. Djouadi, M. Spira and P. Zerwas, Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders: QCD corrections, Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 440 [ INSPIRE ].
92. 4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 353 [ hep-ph/9705240 ] [ INSPIRE ].
93. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz and P. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 17 [ hep-ph/9504378 ] [ INSPIRE ].
94. 5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 061803 [ hep-ph/0604194 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 44223147)
95. J.F. Gunion and H.E. Haber, The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: The Approach to the decoupling limit, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 075019 [ hep-ph/0207010 ] [ INSPIRE ].
96. L. Randall, Two Higgs Models for Large Tan Beta and Heavy Second Higgs, JHEP 02 (2008) 084 [ arXiv:0711.4360 ] [ INSPIRE ].
97. J. Gunion and H.E. Haber, Higgs Bosons in Supersymmetric Models. 1., Nucl. Phys. B 272 (1986) 1 [Erratum ibid. B 402 (1993) 567] [ INSPIRE ].
98. K. Blum, R.T. D'Agnolo and J. Fan, Natural SUSY Predicts: Higgs Couplings, JHEP 01 (2013) 057 [ arXiv:1206.5303 ] [ INSPIRE ].
99. A. Azatov and J. Galloway, Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and the Higgs Boson: Confronting Theories at Colliders, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1330004 [ arXiv:1212.1380 ] [ INSPIRE ].
100. T. Appelquist and C.W. Bernard, Strongly Interacting Higgs Bosons, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 200 [ INSPIRE ].
101. A.C. Longhitano, Heavy Higgs Bosons in the Weinberg-Salam Model, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1166 [ INSPIRE ].
102. A.C. Longhitano, Low-Energy Impact of a Heavy Higgs Boson Sector, Nucl. Phys. B 188 (1981) 118 [ INSPIRE ].
103. C. Baker et al., An Improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 131801 [ hep-ex/0602020 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 44477070)
104. W. Griffith, M. Swallows, T. Loftus, M. Romalis, B. Heckel and E. N. Fortson, Improved Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of Hg-199, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 101601 [ INSPIRE ].