메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1653-1660

Predictors of guideline concordance for surveillance colonoscopy recommendations in patients at a safety-net health system

Author keywords

Colon cancer; Colonoscopy; Colorectal adenomas; Prep quality; Screening; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POLYPECTOMY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAFETY-NET HEALTH SYSTEM; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; ADENOMA; ADOLESCENT; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84943348976     PISSN: 09575243     EISSN: 15737225     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0661-x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (8)

References (24)
  • 2
    • 55749085431 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • US preventive services task force recommendation statement
    • Screening for colorectal cancer (2008) US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149:627–637
    • (2008) Ann Intern Med , vol.149 , pp. 627-637
  • 4
    • 84865514164 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the us multi-society task force on colorectal cancer
    • PID: 22763141
    • Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR (2012) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the us multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 143:844–857
    • (2012) Gastroenterology , vol.143 , pp. 844-857
    • Lieberman, D.A.1    Rex, D.K.2    Winawer, S.J.3    Giardiello, F.M.4    Johnson, D.A.5    Levin, T.R.6
  • 8
    • 84879551650 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3srksFOiug%3D%3D, PID: 23580411
    • Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, van Baalen O, Kubben FJ, Moolenaar W, Stolk MF, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME (2013) Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy 45:545–552
    • (2013) Endoscopy , vol.45 , pp. 545-552
    • Sint Nicolaas, J.1    de Jonge, V.2    van Baalen, O.3    Kubben, F.J.4    Moolenaar, W.5    Stolk, M.F.6    Kuipers, E.J.7    van Leerdam, M.E.8
  • 10
    • 80051646633 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the medicare population
    • PID: 21555653
    • Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF (2011) Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the medicare population. Arch Intern Med 171:1335–1343
    • (2011) Arch Intern Med , vol.171 , pp. 1335-1343
    • Goodwin, J.S.1    Singh, A.2    Reddy, N.3    Riall, T.S.4    Kuo, Y.F.5
  • 12
  • 13
    • 77952751590 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer
    • PID: 20226186
    • Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Vijan S (2010) Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 138:2292–2299
    • (2010) Gastroenterology , vol.138 , pp. 2292-2299
    • Saini, S.D.1    Schoenfeld, P.2    Vijan, S.3
  • 14
    • 67651119834 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey
    • PID: 19542818
    • Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, Schoenfeld P (2009) Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:554–558
    • (2009) J Clin Gastroenterol , vol.43 , pp. 554-558
    • Saini, S.D.1    Nayak, R.S.2    Kuhn, L.3    Schoenfeld, P.4
  • 18
    • 84896368959 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy
    • PID: 24630082
    • Menees SB, Elliott E, Govani S, Anastassiades C, Schoenfeld P (2014) Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 79:551–557
    • (2014) Gastrointest Endosc , vol.79 , pp. 551-557
    • Menees, S.B.1    Elliott, E.2    Govani, S.3    Anastassiades, C.4    Schoenfeld, P.5
  • 19
    • 79953776661 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using reimbursement to improve colonoscopy quality
    • PID: 21468074
    • Feldman RE (2011) Using reimbursement to improve colonoscopy quality. Am J Gastroenterol 106:802–803
    • (2011) Am J Gastroenterol , vol.106 , pp. 802-803
    • Feldman, R.E.1
  • 21
    • 80054768316 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice
    • PID: 21698368
    • Ransohoff DF, Yankaskas B, Gizlice Z, Gangarosa L (2011) Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice. Dig Dis Sci 56:2623–2630
    • (2011) Dig Dis Sci , vol.56 , pp. 2623-2630
    • Ransohoff, D.F.1    Yankaskas, B.2    Gizlice, Z.3    Gangarosa, L.4
  • 23
    • 84939607759 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Predictors of poor adherence to US gastroenterologists with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines
    • PID: 25366146
    • Iskandar H, Yan Y, Elwing J, Early D, Colditz GA, Wang JS (2015) Predictors of poor adherence to US gastroenterologists with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Dis Sci 60:971–978
    • (2015) Dig Dis Sci , vol.60 , pp. 971-978
    • Iskandar, H.1    Yan, Y.2    Elwing, J.3    Early, D.4    Colditz, G.A.5    Wang, J.S.6


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.