Development of the Parkland-UT Southwestern Colonoscopy Reporting System (CoRS) for evidence-based colon cancer surveillance recommendations

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 402-406

  Skinner, Celette Sugg ^a,b   Gupta, Samir ^c   Halm, Ethan A ^a,b,d,e   Wright, Shaun ^d   McCallister, Katharine ^a,b   Bishop, Wendy ^a,b   Santini, Noel ^d,e   Mayorga, Christian ^d,e   Agrawal, Deepak ^d,e   Moran, Brett ^d,e   Sanders, Joanne M ^a,b   Singal, Amit G ^a,b,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e PARKLAND HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Decision support; Surveillance; Tailored intervention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; COLON CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY REPORTING SYSTEM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIGESTIVE TRACT ENDOSCOPY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; ALGORITHM; COLONIC POLYPS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; TEXAS; WRITING;

ALGORITHMS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CORRESPONDENCE AS TOPIC; DISCLOSURE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; TEXAS;

EID: 84963729664     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv081     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2013. Atlanta, GA:American Cancer Society; 2013.
2. Tiro JA, Kamineni A, Levin TR, et al. The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(7):1147-1158.
3. Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, Nadel MR, Seeff LC, White A. Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(6):895-904.
4. Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(8):1611-1621.
5. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(1):73-81.
6. Shah TU, Voils CI, McNeil R, Wu R, Fisher DA. Understanding gastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107(9):1283-1287.
7. Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1335-1343.
8. Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, Schoenfeld P. Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43(6):554-558.
9. Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Vijan S. Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(7):2292-2299.
10. Lieberman DA. Colon polyp surveillance: clinical decision tool. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(1):305-306.
11. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA:A Cancer J Clin. 2006;56(3):143-159.
12. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(3):844-857.
13. Kreuter MW, Farrell D. Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication with Computer Technology. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum; 2000.
14. Bishop WP, Tiro JA, Melhado TV, Stevens C, Lee SC, Skinner CS. Evaluating the validity of health literacy items in English- and Spanishspeaking Hispanics from a community registry. Am J Public Health. 2012;2012.
15. Fisher DA. Electronic medical records and improving the quality of the screening process. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(7):683-684.
16. Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.
17. Lipkus I. Increasing colorectal cancer screening among individuals in the carpentry trade: test of risk communication intervention. Prev Med. 2004; 37(5):513-519.
18. Skinner CS, Rawl SM, Moser BK, et al. Impact of the cancer risk intake system on patient-clinician discussions of tamoxifen, genetic counseling, and colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(4):360-365.
19. Rawl SM, Skinner CS, Perkins SM, et al. Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(5):868-885.
20. Lowery JT, Horick N, Kinney AY, et al. A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(4):601-610.
21. James TM, Greiner KA, Ellerbeck EF, Feng C, Ahluwalia JS. Disparities in colorectal cancer screening: a guideline-based analysis of adherence. Ethn Dis. 2007;16(1):228-233.
22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(44):881-888.
23. Gupta S, Sussman DA, Doubeni CA, et al. Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(4):dju032.
24. Chien C, Morimoto LM, Tom J, Li CI. Differences in colorectal carcinoma stage and survival by race and ethnicity. Cancer. 2005;104(3):629-639.
25. Kauh J, Brawley OW, Berger M. Racial disparities in colorectal cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 2007;31(3):123-133.
26. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10-29.
27. Aizer AA, Wilhite TJ, Chen MH, et al. Lack of reduction in racial disparities in cancer-specific mortality over a 20-year period. Cancer. 2014;120(10):1532-1539.