Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: Timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 545-552

  Sint Nicolaas, J ^a   De Jonge, V ^a   Van Baalen, O ^b   Kubben, F J G M ^c   Moolenaar, W ^d   Stolk, M F J ^e   Kuipers, E J ^a   Van Leerdam, M E ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Beatrix Hospital   (Netherlands)

^c Maasstad Hospital   (Netherlands)

^d Medical Centre Alkmaar   (Netherlands)

^e ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLYPECTOMY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

ADENOMA; AGED; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASES; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84879551650     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326359     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Harewood G. C., Lieberman D. A. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of Medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2004; 2 72 77 (Pubitemid 38165402)
2. Winawer S. J., Zauber A. G., Ho M. N. The National Polyp Study Workgroup et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. New Engl J Med: 1993; 329 1977 1981 (Pubitemid 24015040)
3. Zauber A. G., Winawer S. J., O'Brien M. J. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. New Engl J Med: 2012; 366 687 696
4. Levin B., Lieberman D. A., McFarland B. et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology: 2008; 134 1570 1595 (Pubitemid 351615355)
5. Ko C. W., Dominitz J. A., Green P. et al. Utilization and predictors of early repeat colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Gastroenterol: 2010; 105 2670 2679
6. Mysliwiec P. A., Brown M. L., Klabunde C. N. et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Annals Int Med: 2004; 141 264 271
7. Saini S. D., Schoenfeld P., Vijan S. Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology: 2010; 138 2292 2299
8. Schoen R. E., Pinsky P. F., Weissfeld J. L. et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology: 2010; 138 73 81
9. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., Cahen D. L. et al. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 75 98 106
10. Juillerat P., Peytremann-Bridevaux I., Vader J. P. et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Presentation of methodology, general results, and analysis of complications. Endoscopy: 2009; 41 240 246
11. Mulder S. A., Ouwendijk R. J., van Leerdam M. E. et al. A nationwide survey evaluating adherence to guidelines for follow-up after polypectomy or treatment for colorectal cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol: 2008; 42 487 492 (Pubitemid 351572259)
12. Lebwohl B., Kastrinos F., Glick M. et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 1207 1214
13. van Rijn J. C., Reitsma J. B., Stoker J. et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 343 350 (Pubitemid 43381678)
14. Seow C. H., Ee H. C., Willson A. B. et al. Repeat colonoscopy has a low yield even in symptomatic patients. Gastrointest Endosc: 2006; 64 941 947 (Pubitemid 44820088)
15. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., van Leerdam M. E. et al. Systematic literature review and pooled analyses of risk factors for finding adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy. Endoscopy: 2011; 43 560 572
16. Nagengast F. M., Kaandorp C. J., werkgroep C. BO. [Revised CBO guideline 'Follow-up after polypectomy'] Herziene CBO-richtlijn 'Follow-up na poliepectomie'. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd: 2001; 145 2022 2025
17. Krist A. H., Jones R. M., Woolf S. H. et al. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation. Am J Prev Med: 2007; 33 471 478 (Pubitemid 350088358)
18. Mulder S. A., Van Leerdam M. E., Ouwendijk R. J. et al. Attendance at surveillance endoscopy of patients with adenoma or colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol: 2007; 42 66 71 (Pubitemid 46033048)
19. Pignone M., Saha S., Hoerger T. et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals Int Med: 2002; 137 96 104 (Pubitemid 34779153)
20. Panteris V., Haringsma J., Kuipers E. J. Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy: 2009; 41 941 951
21. Sanaka M. R., Super D. M., Feldman E. S. et al. Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative. Gastrointest Endosc: 2006; 63 97 103 (Pubitemid 41827785)
22. Baron T. H., Kimery B. D., Sorbi D. et al. Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: guidelines in an open endoscopy practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2004; 2 178 182 (Pubitemid 38180473)
23. Leffler D. A., Neeman N., Rabb J. M. et al. An alerting system improves adherence to follow-up recommendations from colonoscopy examinations. Gastroenterology: 2011; 140 1166 1173
24. Neerincx M., Terhaar sive Droste J. S., Mulder C. J. et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy: 2010; 42 730 735