Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 551-557

  Menees, Stacy B ^a,b   Elliott, Eric ^a,b   Govani, Shail ^a   Anastassiades, Constantinos ^c   Schoenfeld, Philip ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b VA ANN ARBOR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE PLUS BISACODYL PLUS MACROGOL 3350 PLUS POTASSIUM CHLORIDE PLUS SODIUM CHLORIDE; BICARBONATE PLUS MACROGOL 3350 PLUS POTASSIUM CHLORIDE PLUS SODIUM CHLORIDE; MACROGOL; MACROGOL 3350; MOVIPREP;

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVERAGE RISK PATIENT; BODY MASS; COLONOSCOPY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HYPERPLASTIC POLYP; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; COLON POLYP; PATHOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84896368959     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. B. Levin, D.A. Lieberman, and B. McFarland et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology Gastroenterology 134 2008 1570 1595
2. D.K. Rex, D.A. Johnson, and J.C. Anderson et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected] Am J Gastroenterol 104 2009 739 750
3. A.H. Krist, R.M. Jones, and S.H. Woolf et al. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation Am J Prev Med 33 2007 471 478
4. J.S. Goodwin, A. Singh, and N. Reddy et al. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population Arch Intern Med 171 2011 1335 1343
5. S.D. Saini, R.S. Nayak, and L. Kuhn et al. Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? Results of a national survey J Clin Gastroenterol 43 2009 554 558
6. American Gastroenterological Association Web site. Quality Program Highlights in 2013 Proposed Medicare Rules. 2012. Cited July 12, 2012; Available from: http://www.gastro.org/journals-publications/aga-edigest/archive/aga- edigest-july-12-2012. Accessed July 12, 2012.
7. D. Fisher, J. Grubber, and S. Grambow et al. Factors associated with non-adherence to colonoscopy interval guidelines in an integrated managed care system Gastroenterology 142 suppl 2012 S-80
8. G.C. Harewood, V.K. Sharma, and P. de Garmo Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia Gastrointest Endosc 58 2003 76 79
9. F. Froehlich, V. Wietlisbach, and J.J. Gonvers et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 61 2005 378 384
10. A. Parra-Blanco, D. Nicholas-Perez, and A. Gimenco-Garcia et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study World J Gastroenterol 12 2006 6161 6166
11. C.J. Bowles, R. Leicester, and C. Romaya et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: Are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53 2004 277 283
12. S. Ben-Horin, S. Bar-Meir, and B. Avidan The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 2680 2685
13. M. Larsen, N. Hills, and J. Terdiman The impact of the quality of colon preparation on follow-up colonoscopy recommendations Am J Gastroenterol 106 2011 2058 2062
14. D.T. Campbell, and D.W. Fiske Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix Psychol Bull 56 1959 81 105
15. Graham JW, et al. Psychometric methodology. Understanding and controlling for response bias: Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data. In: Seyer WR and Widaman KF, editors. Psychometric methodology: proceedings of the 7th European meeting of the Psychometric Society in Trier. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Verlag; 1993. p. 585-90.
16. S.I. Donaldson, and E.J. Grant-Vallone Understanding self-report bias in organization behavior research J Bus Psychol 17 2002 245 260
17. D.F. Ransohoff, B. Yankaskas, and Z. Gizlice et al. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice Dig Dis Sci 56 2011 2623 2630
18. C.A. Aronchick, W. Lipshutz, and S. Wright et al. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing Am J Gastroenterol 94 1999 2667
19. D.K. Rex, T.F. Imperiale, and D.R. Latinovich et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1696 1700
20. J.H. Bond Should the quality of preparation impact postcolonoscopy follow-up recommendations? Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 2686 2687
21. T.R. Levin Dealing with uncertainty: surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 1745 1747
22. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, and A.D. Feld Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 96 2001 952 957
23. D.A. Lieberman, D.K. Rex, and S.J. Winawer et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Gastroenterology 143 2012 844 857
24. R. McCarney, J. Warner, and S. Iliffe et al. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial BMC Med Res Methodol 7 2007 30
25. N.S. Fox, J.S. Brennan, and S.T. Chasen Clinical estimation of fetal weight and the Hawthorne effect Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 141 2008 111 114
26. M. Zeglis, M. Chang, and H.M. Kim et al. Effect of bowel preparation quality on screening interval after a normal screening colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 AB197
27. J.S. Goodwin, A. Singh, and N. Reddy et al. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the medicare population Arch Intern Med 171 2011 1335 1343
28. T. Imperiale Screening for colorectal cancer in the elderly population Arch Intern Med 171 2011 1332 1334
29. N.N. Baxter, M.A. Goldwasser, and L.F. Paszat et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer Ann Intern Med 150 2009 1 8
30. A. Rostom, and E. Jolicoeur Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality Gastrointest Endosc 59 2004 482 486
31. E.J. Lai, A.H. Calderwood, and G. Doros et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 (Pt 2)620-5