Post-polypectomy Guideline Adherence: Importance of Belief in Guidelines, Not Guideline Knowledge or Fear of Missed Cancer

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2937-2945

  Patel, Neha ^a   Tong, Liyue ^b   Ahn, Chul ^a   Singal, Amit G ^a   Gupta, Samir ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Guideline adherence; Polypectomy; Practice patterns; Recommendations; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; FEAR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; NEOPLASM; PERCEPTION; POLYPECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; CULTURE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEAR; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84942194655     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: 15732568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3685-x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:73–81.
2. Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM, et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:562–567; quiz 497.
3. van Heijningen EM, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Steyerberg EW, et al. Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: a large, community-based study. Gut. 2015. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306453.
4. Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:264–271.
5. Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP, et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:74 e1–80 e1.
6. Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:385–391.
7. Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1259–1264.
8. Ransohoff DF. Economic impact of surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:S67–S71.
9. Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, van Baalen O, et al. Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy. 2013;45:545–552.
10. Menees SB, Elliott E, Govani S, et al. Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:551–557.
11. Shah TU, Voils CI, McNeil R, et al. Understanding gastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1283–1287.
12. Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? Results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:554–558.
13. CMS. CMS proposes hospital outpatient and ambulatory surgical centers policy and payment changes for 2014 Fact Sheets. 2013, July 8 ed, 2013.
14. Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1865–1871.
15. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:143–159; quiz 184–185.
16. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.
17. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–1085.
18. Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:419–426.
19. Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–841.
20. Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:86–92.
21. Ransohoff DF, Yankaskas B, Gizlice Z, et al. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2623–2630.
22. le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, et al. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut. 2014;63:957–963.