Corrigendum to: Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 : Characterization of bacterial cellulose… (Journal of Food Science, (2015), 80, 10, (E2217-E2227), 10.1111/1750-3841.13010);Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 80, Issue 10, 2015, Pages E2217-E2227

  Feng, Xianchao ^a   Ullah, Niamat ^a,c   Wang, Xuejiao ^a   Sun, Xuchun ^a   Li, Chenyi ^a   Bai, Yun ^a,b   Chen, Lin ^a   Li, Zhixi ^a  

^a NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c THE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Food industry; High hydrostatic pressure; Static culture condition

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; FOOD ADDITIVE; WATER;

ADSORPTION; CHEMISTRY; FLOW KINETICS; FOOD PACKAGING; GLUCONACETOBACTER; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; PHYSIOLOGY; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOSITY;

ADSORPTION; CELLULOSE; FOOD ADDITIVES; FOOD PACKAGING; GLUCONACETOBACTER; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; RHEOLOGY; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOSITY; WATER;

EID: 84943327330     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14739     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Akalin A, Karagözlü C, Ünal G. 2008. Rheological properties of reduced-fat and low-fat ice cream containing whey protein isolate and inulin. Eur Food Res Technol 227(3):889-95.
2. Amin MCIM, Abadi AG, Katas H. 2014. Purification, characterization, and comparative studies of spray-dried bacterial cellulose microparticles. Carbohyd Polym 99:180-9.
3. Andersson S, Serimaa R, Paakkari T, SaranpÄÄ P, Pesonen E. 2003. Crystallinity of wood and the size of cellulose crystallites in Norway spruce (Picea abies). J Wood Sci 49(6):531-7.
4. Brown EE, Laborie M-PG. 2007. Bioengineering bacterial cellulose/poly (ethylene oxide) nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 8(10):3074-81.
5. Cai Z, Kim J. 2010. Bacterial cellulose/poly (ethylene glycol) composite: characterization and 1st evaluation of biocompatibility. Cellulose 17(1):83-91.
6. Caine W, Aalhus J, Best D, Dugan M, Jeremiah L. 2003. Relationship of texture profile analysis and Warner-Bratzler shear force with sensory characteristics of beef rib steaks. Meat Sci 64(4):333-9.
7. Cheng K-C, Catchmark JM, Demirci A. 2009. Effect of different additives on bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum and analysis of material property. Cellulose 16(6):1033-45.
8. Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, Brown Jr RM. 2006. Microbial cellulose-the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27(2):145-51.
9. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM. 2007. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8(1):1-12.
10. Dayal MS, Goswami N, Sahai A, Jain V, Mathur G, Mathur A. 2013. Effect of media components on cell growth and bacterial cellulose production from Acetobacter aceti MTCC 2623. Carbohyd Polym 94(1):12-6.
11. De Wulf P, Joris K, Vandamme EJ. 1996. Improved cellulose formation by an Acetobacter xylinum mutant limited in (keto) gluconate synthesis. J Chem Technol Biot 67(4):376-80.
12. Farah LF, inventor; U.S. Patent 4, 912, 049A, assignee. 1990 27 March 1990. Process for the preparation of cellulose film, cellulose film produced thereby, artificial skin graft and its use.
13. Gatenholm P, Klemm D. 2010. Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. Mrs Bull 35(03):208-13.
14. Ge H-J, Du S-K, Lin D-H, Zhang J-N, Xiang J-L, Li Z-X. 2011. Gluconacetobacter hansenii subsp. nov., a high-yield bacterial cellulose producing strain induced by high hydrostatic pressure. Appl Biochem Biotech 165(7-8):1519-31.
15. George J, Ramana KV, Sabapathy SN, Jagannath JH, Bawa AS. 2005. Characterization of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) biopolymer: some thermo-mechanical properties. Int J Biol Macromol 37(4):189-94.
16. Hutchens SA, Leon R, O'Neill HM, Evans BR. 2007. Statistical analysis of optimal culture conditions for Gluconacetobacter hansenii cellulose production. Lett Appl Microbiol 44(2):175-80.
17. Jipa IM, Stoica-Guzun A, Stroescu M. 2012. Controlled release of sorbic acid from bacterial cellulose based mono and multilayer antimicrobial films. LWT-Food Sci Technol 47(2):400-6.
18. Jung JY, Khan T, Park JK, Chang HN. 2007. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii using a novel bioreactor equipped with a spin filter. Korean J Chem Eng 24(2):265-71.
19. Kowalska-Ludwicka K, Cala J, Grobelski B, Sygut D, Jesionek-Kupnicka D, Kolodziejczyk M, Bielecki S, Pasieka Z. 2013. Modified bacterial cellulose tubes for regeneration of damaged peripheral nerves. Arch Med Sci 9(3):527-34.
20. Krystynowicz A, Czaja W, Wiktorowska-Jezierska A, Gonçalves-Miśkiewicz M, Turkiewicz M, Bielecki S. 2002. Factors affecting the yield and properties of bacterial cellulose. J Ind Microbiol Biot 29(4):189-95.
21. Lee K-Y, Bismarck A. 2012. Susceptibility of never-dried and freeze-dried bacterial cellulose towards esterification with organic acid. Cellulose 19(3):891-900.
22. Lin D, Lopez-Sanchez P, Li R, Li Z. 2014a. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Biores Technol 151:113-9.
23. Lin D, Wang N, Li Z, Li Y. 2014b. Characterizations of bacterial cellulose producing strain Gluconoacetobacter hansenii CGMCC3917. J Bioprocess Biotech 4(4):1-6.
24. Liu D, Chen X, Yue Y, Chen M, Wu Q. 2011. Structure and rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose. Carbohyd Polym 84(1):316-22.
25. Liu F-z, Zhang H, Mu K. 2008. Efffcts of high static pressure on beer yeast mutation breeding. Liquor Making Sci Technol 3(165):51-55.
26. Mancini CE, Berndt CC, Sun L, Kucuk A. 2001. Porosity determinations in thermally sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings. J Mater Sci 36(16):3891-6.
27. Maneerung T, Tokura S, Rujiravanit R. 2008. Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohyd Polym 72(1):43-51.
28. Mohite BV, Patil SV. 2014. Physical, structural, mechanical, and thermal characterization of bacterial cellulose by Gluconoacetobacter hansenii NCIM 2529. Carbohyd Polym 106:132-41.
29. Mohite BV, Salunke BK, Patil SV. 2013. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using Gluconoacetobacter hansenii NCIM 2529 strain under shaking conditions. Appl Biochem Biotech 169(5):1497-511.
30. Moon S-H, Park J-M, Chun H-Y, Kim S-J. 2006. Comparisons of physical properties of bacterial celluloses produced in different culture conditions using saccharified food wastes. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 11(1):26-31.
31. Nguyen VT, Flanagan B, Gidley MJ, Dykes GA. 2008. Characterization of cellulose production by a Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain from Kombucha. Curr Microbiol 57(5):449-53.
32. Okiyama A, Motoki M, Yamanaka S. 1992. Bacterial cellulose II. Processing of the gelatinous cellulose for food materials. Food Hydrocolloid 6(5):479-87.
33. Okiyama A, Motoki M, Yamanaka S. 1993. Bacterial cellulose IV. Application to processed foods. Food Hydrocolloid 6(6):503-11.
34. Ortega-Rivas E. 2012. Ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure. Non-thermal Food Engineering OperationsSpringer US. p. 301-23.
35. Park JK, Khan T, Jung JY. 2009. Bacterial cellulose. In: Phillips GO, Williams PA, editors. Handbook of hydrocolloids. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited. p 724-39.
36. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK. 2010. Research cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulose performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(10):103-11.
37. Petersen N, Gatenholm P. 2011. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biot 91(5):1277-86.
38. Phisalaphong M, Chiaoprakobkij N. 2012. Applications and Products-Nata de Coco. In: Miguel G, Paul G, Dieter K, editors. Bacterial c ellulose: a sophisticated multifunctional material. CRC Press, Boca Raton p. 143-56.
39. Rani MU, Appaiah KA. 2013. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 using coffee cherry husk. J Food Sci Technol 50(4):755-62.
40. Rojas J, López A, Gamboa Y, González C, Montoya F. 2011. Assessment of processing and polymorphic form effect on the powder and tableting properties of microcrystalline celluloses I and II. Chem Pharm Bull 59(5):603-7.
41. Roman M, Winter WT. 2004. Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5(5):1671-7.
42. Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M. 1991. Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiological Reviews 55(1):35-58.
43. Shafiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos SG. 2012. Rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose aqueous suspensions. Langmuir 28(49):17124-33.
44. Shezad O, Khan S, Khan T, Park JK. 2010. Physicochemical and mechanical characterization of bacterial cellulose produced with an excellent productivity in static conditions using a simple fed-batch cultivation strategy. Carbohyd Polym 82(1):173-80.
45. Shi Z, Zhang Y, Phillips GO, Yang G. 2014. Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocolloid 35:539-45.
46. Sun XD, Holley RA. 2010. High hydrostatic pressure effects on the texture of meat and meat products. J Food Sci 75(1):R17-R23.
47. Sundar ST, Sain MM, Oksman K. 2010. Characterization of microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose long fiber modified by iron salt. Carbohyd Polym 80(1):35-43.
48. Toğrul H, Arslan N. 2003. Production of carboxymethyl cellulose from sugar beet pulp cellulose and rheological behaviour of carboxymethyl cellulose. Carbohyd Polym 54(1):73-82.
49. Tomé LC, Brandão L, Mendes AM, Silvestre AJ, Neto CP, Gandini A, Freire CS, Marrucho IM. 2010. Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose membranes with tailored surface and barrier properties. Cellulose 17(6):1203-11.
50. Ul-Islam M, Ha JH, Khan T, Park JK. 2013. Effects of glucuronic acid oligomers on the production, structure, and properties of bacterial cellulose. Carbohyd Polym 92(1):360-6.
51. Venugopal J, Low S, Choon AT, Ramakrishna S. 2008. Interaction of cells and nanofiber scaffolds in tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 84(1):34-48.
52. Wada M, Okano T, Sugiyama J. 2001. Allomorphs of native crystalline cellulose I evaluated by 2 equatoriald-spacings. J Wood Sci 47(2):124-8.
53. Wang S, Wu X, Duan X, Sun J. 2006. Mutagenic effects of ultra-high pressure on laccase producing strains. Ind Microbiol 36:31-5.
54. Wu R-Q, Li Z-X, Yang J-P, Xing X-H, Shao D-Y, Xing K-L. 2010. Mutagenesis induced by high hydrostatic pressure treatment: a useful method to improve the bacterial cellulose yield of a Gluconoacetobacter xylinus strain. Cellulose 17(2):399-405.
55. Yan Z, Chen S, Wang H, Wang B, Jiang J. 2008. Biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose/multi-walled carbon nanotubes in agitated culture. Carbohyd Polym 74(3):659-65.
56. Yang F, Bick A, Shandalov S, Brenner A, Oron G. 2009. Yield stress and rheological characteristics of activated sludge in an airlift membrane bioreactor. J Membrane Sci 334(1):83-90.
57. Zhu H, Jia S, Yang H, Tang W, Jia Y, Tan Z. 2010. Characterization of bacteriostatic sausage casing: a composite of bacterial cellulose embedded with e{open}-polylysine. Food Sci Biotechnol 19(6):1479-84.