Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 518-536

  Landy, Justin F ^a   Goodwin, Geoffrey P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Disgust; Meta analysis; Misattribution; Moral judgment

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORALITY;

EMOTIONS; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MORALS;

EID: 84943155546     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691615583128     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
2. Argo, T. N. (2013). Dirt, disorder, and deontology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The New School, New York, NY.
3. Baron, J., Royzman, E. B., & Goodwin, G. P. (2013). Is disgust a moralizing emotion? Exploring the sufficiency thesis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Boyle, D. (Director). (1996). Trainspotting (Motion picture). London, United Kingdom: Channel Four Films.
6. Cameron, C. D., Payne, B. K., & Doris, J. M. (2013). Morality in high definition: Emotion differentiation calibrates the influence of incidental disgust on moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 719-725.
7. Cannon, P. R., Schnall, S., & White, M. (2011). Transgressions and expressions: Affective facial muscle activity predicts moral judgments. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 325-331.
8. Case, T. I., Oaten, M. J., & Stevenson, R. J. (2012). Disgust and moral judgment. In R. Langdon & C. Mackenzie (Eds.), Emotions, imagination, and moral reasoning (pp. 195-218). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
9. Cerban, B., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2010). Judging smokers: How anger and disgust shape our moral beliefs. Unpublished manuscript, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA.
10. Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2011). Response to Royzman and Kurzban. Emotion Review, 3, 272-273.
11. Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2014). Trait physical disgust is related to moral judgments outside of the purity domain. Emotion, 14, 341-348.
12. Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323, 1222-1226.
13. Cheng, J. S., Ottati, V. C., & Price, E. D. (2013). The arousal model of moral condemnation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1012-1018.
14. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
15. David, B., & Olatunji, B. O. (2011). The effect of disgust conditioning and disgust sensitivity on appraisals of moral transgressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1142-1146.
16. Duval, S. (2006). The trim and fill method. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments (pp. 127-146). West Sussex, England: Jon Wiley & Sons.
17. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnelplot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463.
18. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634.
19. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Eskine, K. J. (2011). From perceptual symbols to abstraction and back again: The bitter truth about morality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York, New York.
21. Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgments. Psychological Science, 22, 295-299.
22. Fine, C. (2006). Is the emotional dog wagging its tail, or chasing it? Philosophical Explorations, 9, 83-98.
23. Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2011). Political ideology and reactions to crime victims: Preferences for restorative and punitive responses. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 830-855.
24. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
25. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
26. Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613-628.
27. Harlé, K. M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on interactive economic decisions. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1456-1465.
28. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
29. Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963-976.
30. Hume, D. (2003). A treatise of human nature. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1739)
31. Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 719-737.
32. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 714-725.
33. Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F., & Donnellan, M. B. (2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 209-215.
34. Jones, A., & Fitness, J. (2008). Moral hypervigilance: The influence of disgust sensitivity in the moral domain. Emotion, 8, 613-627.
35. Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151-235). New York, NY: Academic Press.
36. Landy, J. F., & Piazza, J. (2015). More than just morality: Disgust sensitivity is associated with a wide array of evaluative judgments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
37. Lindeman, L. M. (2010). Embodied concept learning as a developmental pathway to social disgust (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison.
38. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. (2003). The role of affect in decision-making. In R. J. Davidson, H. H. Goldsmith, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619-642). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
40. Miller, L. C., Murphy, R., & Buss, A. H. (1981). Consciousness of body: Public and private. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 397-406.
41. Monin, B., Pizarro, D. A., & Beer, J. S. (2007). Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reasonaffect debate. Review of General Psychology, 111, 99-111.
42. Moretti, L., & Di Pellegrino, G. (2010). Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions. Emotion, 10, 169-180.
43. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125.
44. Nabi, R. L. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 695-703.
45. Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303-321.
46. O’Connor, C., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2011). The role of disgust in morality and perceptions of smoking. Unpublished manuscript, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA.
47. Ong, H. H., Mullette-Gillman, O. A., Kwok, K., & Lim, J. (2014). Moral judgment modulation by disgust is bi-directionally moderated by individual sensitivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 194.
48. Piazza, J., Loughnan, S., & Vauclair, C. M. (2010). [Effects of auditory and visual disgust cues on moral and non-moral judgments]. Unpublished raw data.
49. Pizarro, D. A., Inbar, Y., & Helion, C. (2011). On disgust and moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 267-268.
50. Prinz, J. (2006). The emotional basis of moral judgments. Philosophical Explorations, 9, 29-43.
51. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82.
52. Rozyman, E. (2014). Comment: Strohminger-McGinn: Deconstructing the moral amplification effect. Emotion Review, 6, 224-225.
53. Royzman, E. B., Atanasov, P., Landy, J. F., Parks, A., & Gepty, A. (2014). CAD or MAD? Anger (not disgust) as the predominant response to pathogen-free violations of the divinity code. Emotion, 14, 892-907.
54. Royzman, E. B., Goodwin, G. P., & Leeman, R. F. (2011). When sentimental rules collide: “Norms with feelings” in the dilemmatic context. Cognition, 121, 104-114.
55. Royzman, E. B., & Kurzban, R. (2011a). Facial movements are not goosebumps: A response to Chapman and Anderson. Emotion Review, 3, 274-275.
56. Royzman, E. B., & Kurzban, R. (2011b). Minding the metaphor: The elusive character of moral disgust. Emotion Review, 3, 269-271.
57. Royzman, E. B., Leeman, R. F., & Baron, J. (2009). Unsentimental ethics: Towards a content-specific account of the moralconventional distinction. Cognition, 112, 159-174.
58. Royzman, E. B., Leeman, R. F., & Sabini, J. (2008). “You make me sick”: Moral dyspepsia as a reaction to third-party sibling incest. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 100-108.
59. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & Fincher, K. (2009). From oral to moral. Science, 323, 1179-1180.
60. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2008). Disgust. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757-776). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
61. Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574-586.
62. Russell, J. A., & Fehr, B. (1994). Fuzzy concepts in a fuzzy hierarchy: Varieties of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 186-205.
63. Russell, P. S. (2009). Why is disgust a more unreasoned emotion than anger? An examination of the cognitive processes that accompany moral anger and disgust (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, England.
64. Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011). Moral anger, but not moral disgust, responds to intentionality. Emotion, 11, 233-240.
65. Russell, P. S., Piazza, J., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). CAD revisited: Effects of the word moral on the moral relevance of disgust (and other emotions). Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 62-68.
66. Saltzstein, H. D., & Kasachkoff, T. (2004). Haidt’s moral intuitionist theory: A psychological and philosophical critique. Review of General Psychology, 8, 273-282.
67. Sato, A., & Sugiura, Y. (2014). Dispositional mindfulness modulates automatic transference of disgust into moral judgment. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 84, 605-611.
68. Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219-1222.
69. Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096-1109.
70. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
71. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? The informative function of affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44-62). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe.
72. Seidel, A., & Prinz, J. (2013). Sound morality: Irritating and icky noises amplify judgments in divergent moral domains. Cognition, 127, 1-5.
73. Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J., & Nelson, L. (2014, December 3). [30] Trim-and-fill is full of it (bias) [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://datacolada.org/2014/12/03/30-trim-and-fill-isfull-of-it-bias-2
74. Singh, G. (2010). Effect of core and sociomoral disgust on moral judgments. Unpublished manuscript, California State University, Fresno, CA.
75. Strohminger, N. (2012). The hedonics of disgust (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
76. Strohminger, N., Lewis, R. L., & Schwarz, N. (2010). [Wrongness and humor of “ridiculous” moral violations]. Unpublished raw data.
77. Tetlock, P. E., Visser, P. S., Singh, R., Polifroni, M., Scott, A., Elson, S. B.,... Rescober, P. (2007). People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social control goals on attributions of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 195-209.
78. Tobias, M., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2010). Judging fatness: The effects of emotion on moral judgment and moral judgment on emotion. Unpublished manuscript, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA.
79. Travers, J. B., & Norgren, R. (1986). Electromyographic analysis of the ingestion and rejection of sapid stimuli in the rat. Behavioral Neuroscience, 100, 544-555.
80. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
81. Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103-122.
82. Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120, 65-84.
83. Tybur, J. M., Merriman, L. A., Caldwell Hooper, A. E., McDonald, M. M., & Navarrete, C. D. (2010). Extending the behavioral immune system to political psychology: Are political conservatism and disgust sensitivity really related? Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 599-616.
84. Ugazio, G., Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2012). The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario. Emotion, 12, 579-590.
85. Van Dillen, L. F., van der Wal, R. C., & van den Bos, K. (2012). On the role of attention and emotion in morality: Attentional control modulates unrelated disgust in moral judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1222-1231.
86. Vernon, D., D’Amico, C., Glazer, K., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2012). The effect of disgust on moral judgment in Americans and Indians: Assessing the CAD hypothesis. Unpublished manuscript, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA.
87. Wagner, B. C. (2012). The effects of disgust on social judgment: A thought-validation perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
88. Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780-784.
89. Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 859-862.
90. Zickgraf, H., Kim, Y., & Rozin, P. (2012). Physical cleanliness and moral decision-making: The effect of Private Body Consciousness. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.