Health-related quality of life after stroke: reliability and validity of the Duke Health Profile for use in Vietnam

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2807-2814

  Tran, Pham L ^a,b   Leigh Blizzard, C ^a   Srikanth, Velandai ^a,c   Hanh, Vo T X ^b   Lien, Nguyen T K ^d   Thang, Nguyen H ^d   Gall, Seana L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b PHAM NGOC THACH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Viet Nam)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d People's Hospital 115   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Duke Health Profile; Health related quality of life; Reliability; Stroke; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUKE HEALTH PROFILE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; SELF ESTEEM; STROKE PATIENT; VALIDATION STUDY; VALIDITY; VIET NAM; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STROKE;

COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; VIETNAM;

EID: 84942981425     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: 15732649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1016-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Briancon, S., Alla, F., Mejat, E., Guillemin, F., Villemot, J. P., Mertes, P. M., et al. (1997). Measurement of functional inability and quality of life in cardiac failure. Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Goldman, Minnesota and Duke questionnaires. Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux,90(12), 1577–1585.
2. Perret-Guillaume, C., Briancon, S., Wahl, D., Guillemin, F., & Empereur, F. (2010). Quality of Life in elderly inpatients with atrial fibrillation as compared with controlled subjects. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging,14(2), 161–166.
3. Novella, J., Ankri, J., Morrone, I., Guillemin, F., Jolly, D., Jochum, C., et al. (2001). Evaluation of the quality of life in dementia with a generic quality of life questionnaire: The Duke Health Profile. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders,12(2), 158–166.
4. Hanh, V. T., Guillemin, F., Cong, D. D., Parkerson, G. R, Jr, Thu, P. B., Quynh, P. T., et al. (2005). Health related quality of life of adolescents in Vietnam: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Adolescent Duke Health Profile. J Adolesc,28(1), 127–146. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.11.016.
5. Hanh, X. T. V., & Cong, D. D. (2010). Relationship among sociodemographic factors, reported health chronic problems and health-related quality of life: a survey in the adult general population, HCM City, Vietnam. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh, 14(2), 218–225, http://tcyh.yds.edu.vn/2010/Tap%2014%20Phu%20ban%20so%202%20-OK/Chuyen%20de%20HNKHKT%20DH%20Y%20PNT/218-225.htm.
6. Hatano, S. (1976). Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bulletin of the World Health Organization,54(5), 541–553.
7. UK-TIA Study Group. (1988). United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: Interim results. British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.),296(6618), 316–320.
8. Brott, T., Adams, H. P, Jr, Olinger, C. P., Marler, J. R., Barsan, W. G., Biller, J., et al. (1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke,20(7), 864–870.
9. Lee, Y. K., Nam, H. S., Chuang, L. H., Kim, K. Y., Yang, H. K., Kwon, I. S., et al. (2009). South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health,12(8), 1187–1193. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00579.x.
10. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics,33(1), 159–174.
11. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological),57(1), 289–300. doi:10.2307/2346101.
12. Baumann, C., Erpelding, M. L., Perret-Guillaume, C., Gautier, A., Regat, S., Collin, J. F., et al. (2011). Health-related quality of life in French adolescents and adults: norms for the DUKE Health Profile. BMC Public Health,11, 401. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-401.
13. Guillemin, F., Paul-Dauphin, A., Virion, J. M., Bouchet, C., & Briancon, S. (1997). The DUKE health profile: a generic instrument to measure the quality of life tied to health. Sante Publique,9(1), 35–44.
14. Cabral, D. L., Laurentino, G. E., Damascena, C. G., Faria, C. D., Melo, P. G., & Teixeira-Salmela, L. F. (2012). Comparisons of the Nottingham Health Profile and the SF-36 health survey for the assessment of quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapi,16(4), 301–308. Epub 2012 Jun 2021.
15. Gurcay, E., Bal, A., & Cakci, A. (2009). Health-related quality of life in first-ever stroke patients. Annals of Saudi Medicine,29(1), 36–40.
16. Abubakar, S. A., & Isezuo, S. A. (2012). Health related quality of life of stroke survivors: Experience of a stroke unit. International Journal of Biomedical Sciences,8(3), 183–187.
17. Samsa, G., Edelman, D., Rothman, M. L., Williams, G. R., Lipscomb, J., & Matchar, D. (1999). Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: A general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics,15(2), 141–155.
18. Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care,41(5), 582–592. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000062554.74615.4c.
19. Bouchet, C., Guillemin, F., Paul-Dauphin, A., & Briancon, S. (2000). Selection of quality-of-life measures for a prevention trial: a psychometric analysis. Controlled Clinical Trials,21(1), 30–43.
20. Duncan, P. W., Lai, S. M., Tyler, D., Perera, S., Reker, D. M., & Studenski, S. (2002). Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke,33(11), 2593–2599.
21. Vellone, E., Savini, S., Simeone, S., Barbato, N., Castrovillano, G., Caramia, M. D., et al. (2011). Reliability of caregivers in assessing the quality of life of stroke survivors: An explorative study. Assistenza infermieristica e ricerca: AIR,30(4), 180–188. doi:10.1702/1007.10956.
22. Carod-Artal, F. J., Ferreira Coral, L., Stieven Trizotto, D., & Menezes Moreira, C. (2009). Self- and proxy-report agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke,40(10), 3308–3314. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.558031.
23. Oczkowski, C., & O’Donnell, M. (2010). Reliability of proxy respondents for patients with stroke: A systematic review. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases,19(5), 410–416. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.08.002.
24. Parkerson, G. R, Jr, Broadhead, W. E., & Tse, C. K. (1990). The Duke Health Profile: A 17-item measure of health and dysfunction. Medical Care,28(11), 1056–1072.
25. Smith, S. C., Lamping, D. L., Banerjee, S., Harwood, R., Foley, B., Smith, P., et al. (2005). Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technology Assessment,9(10), 1–93. iii-iv.
26. Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke,30(10), 2131–2140.
27. Marx, R. G., Menezes, A., Horovitz, L., Jones, E. C., & Warren, R. F. (2003). A comparison of two time intervals for test–retest reliability of health status instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,56(8), 730–735.