Selection of quality-of-life measures for a prevention trial: A psychometric analysis

Controlled Clinical Trials

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 30-43

  Bouchet, Christine ^a   Guillemin, Francis ^a   Paul Dauphin, Agnès ^a   Briançon, Serge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Primary prevention; Psychometric properties; Quality of life; Trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANCER; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUTRITION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033985384     PISSN: 01972456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(99)00038-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ware J.E., Brook R.H., Davies A.R.et al. Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general population. Am J Public Health. 71:1981;620-625.
2. Erickson P., Patrick D.L. Guidelines for selecting Quality of Life assessment. Methodological and practical considerations J Drug Therapy Research. 13:1988;159-163.
3. Hercberg S., Preziosi P., Briançon S.et al. A primary prevention trial of nutritional doses of antioxidant vitamins and minerals on cardiovascular diseases and cancers in general population. The SU.VI.MAX study Control Clin Trial. 19:1998;336-351.
4. Hunt S.M., Mc Kenna S.P., McEwen J.et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status. a validation study J Epidemiol Comm Health. 34:1980;281-286.
5. Stewart A.L., Hays R.D., Ware J.E. The MOS short form general health survey. Med Care. 26:1988;724-735.
6. Parkerson G.R., Broadhead W.E., Tse C.K. The Duke Health Profile. A 17 item measure of health and dysfunction Med Care. 28:1990;1056-1072.
7. Parkerson G.J., Broadhead W.E., Tse C.K.J. Quality of life and functional health of primary care patients. J Clin Epid. 45:1992;1303-1313.
8. Jenkinson C., Fitzpatrick R., Argyle M. The Nottingham Health Profile. An analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness group Soc Sci Med. 27:1988;1411-1414.
9. Fitzpatrick R., Ziebland S., Jenkinson C.et al. A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheum. 20:1993;429-436.
10. Bucquet D., Condon S., Ritchie K. The French version of the Nottingham Health Profile. A comparison of item weights with those of the source version Soc Sci Med. 30:1990;829-835.
11. Essink-Bot M.L., Krabbe F.M., Van Agt M.H.et al. NHP or SIP - A comparative study in renal insufficiency associated anemia. Quality of Life Research. 5:1996;91-100.
12. McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Raczek A.E. The MOS 36 items Short Form Health Survey (SF36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 31:1993;247-263.
13. McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Lu J.F., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-items Short-Form Health Survey (SF36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 32:1994;40-66.
14. Leplège A., Mesbah M., Marquis P. Analyse préliminaire des propriétés psychométriques de la version française du SF36 dans le cadre du project IQOLA. Rev Epidémiol Santé Publ. 43:1995;371-379.
15. Parkerson G.H., Gehlbach S.H., Wagner E.H.et al. The Duke-UNC Health Profile. An adult health status instrument for primary care Med Care. 19:1981;806-823.
16. Guillemin F., Bombardier C., Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures. Literature review and proposed guidelines J Clin Epidemiol. 46:1993;1417-1432.
17. Guillemin F., Paul-Dauphin A., Virion J.M.et al. Le profil de santé de Duke. Un instrument générique de mesure de qualité de vie liée à la santé Santé Publique. 1:1997;35-44.
18. Bouchet C., Guillemin F., Briançon S. Non-specific effects in longitudinal studies. Impact on quality of life measures J Clin Epidemiol. 49:1996;15-20.
19. Streiner D.L., Norman G.R. Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to their Development and Use:1989;Oxford Medical Publications, Toronto.
20. Beaton D.E., Hogg-Johnson S., Bombardier C. Evaluating change in health status. Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;79-93.
21. Deyo R.A., Centor R.M. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change. An analogy to diagnostic test performance J Chronic Dis. 3:1986;897-906.
22. Guyatt G.H., Walter S.D., Norman G.R. Measuring change over time. assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments J Chronic Dis. 40:1987;171-178.
23. Shrout P.E., Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations. uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol Bull. 86:1979;420-428.
24. Guyatt G., Bombardier C., Tugwell P.A. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. JAMA. 134:1986;889-895.
25. Kirschner B., Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 38:1985;27-36.
26. Deyo R.A., Diehr P., Patrick D.L. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures, statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 12:1991;142S-158S.
27. Liang M.H., Larson M.G., Cullen K.E.et al. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum. 28:1985;542-547.
28. Katz J.N., Larson M.G., Phillips C.B.et al. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 30:1992;917-922.
29. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 1977;Academic Press, New York.
30. Lukkarinen H., Hentinen M. Assessment of quality of life with the Nottingham Health Profile among patients with coronary heart disease. J Adv Nurs. 26:1997;73-84.
31. Skinner J.S. Comparison of Nottingham Health Profile scores with exercises duration and measures of ischaemia during treadmill exercise testing in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 16:1995;1561-1565.
32. Visser M.C., Fletcher A.E., Parr G.et al. A comparison of three quality of life instruments in subjects with angina pectoris. the Sickness Impact Profile, the Nottingham Health Profile and the Quality of Well Being Scale J Clin Epidemiol. 47:1994;157-163.
33. Wright J.G., Young N.L. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;239-246.
34. Wiklund I., Karlberg K. Evaluation of Quality of Life in clinical trials. Selecting quality-of-life measures. Control Clin Trials. 12:1991;204S-216S.
35. Mauskopf J.A., Austin R., Dix L.P.et al. Estimating the value of a generic quality of life measure. Med Care. 33:1995;AS195-AS202.
36. Chen A.L., Broadhead W.E., Doe E.A.et al. Patient acceptance of two health status measures. The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey, and the Duke Health Profile Family Med. 25:1993;536-539.
37. Prieto L., Alonso J., Ferrer M.et al. Are results of the SF36 survey and the Nottingham Health Profile similar? A comparison in COPD patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;463-473.
38. Essink-Bot M.L., Krabbe P.F., Bonsel G.H.et al. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. Med Care. 35:1997;522-536.
39. Kind P., Carr-Hill R. The Nottingham Health Profile. a useful tool for epidemiologists? Soc Sci Med. 25:1987;905-910.
40. Brazier J.E., Harper R., Jones N.M.B.et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. new outcome measure for primary care BMJ. 305:1992;160-164.
41. VanderZee K.I., Sanderman R., Heyink J. A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status. The Nottingham Health Profile and the Ran 36-Item Health Survey Qual Life Res. 5:1996;165-174.
42. Brazier J., Jones N., Kind P. Testing the validity of the Euroquol and comparing it with the SF36 health survey questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2:1993;169-180.
43. Dorman P.J., Slattery J., Farell B.et al. A randomised comparison of the EuroQol and Short Form-36 after stroke. BMJ. 315:1997;461.
44. Holmes A.M., Parchman A.M., Bang H. Patient preference for health status screening instruments. Family Practice. 12:1995;88-92.