South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: Modeling with observed values for 101 health states

Value in Health

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1187-1193

  Lee, Yeon Kyeng ^a   Nam, Hae Sung ^b   Chuang, Ling Hsiang ^c   Kim, Keon Yeop ^d   Yang, Hae Kyung ^b   Kwon, In Sun ^b   Kind, Paul ^c   Kweon, Sun Seog ^e   Kim, Young Tack ^a  

^a Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   (South Korea)

^b Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d Kyungpook National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Population values; Preference based measures; Time trade off

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; EUROQOL 5D; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; REFERENCE VALUE; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 70350761707     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00579.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Busschbach J, Weihnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, et al. A comparison of EQ-5D time trade-off values obtained in Germany, The United Kingdom and Spain. In : Brooks R, Rabin R, Charro F, eds. The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European perspective. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2003.
2. Saxena S, Carlson D, Billington R, et al. The WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-Bref): the importance of its items for cross-cultural research. Qual Life Res 2001 10 : 711 721.
3. Jelsma J, Hansen K, De Weerdt W, et al. How do Zimbabweans value health states? Popul Health Metr 2003 1 : 1 10.
4. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001 33 : 337 343.
5. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003 1 : 1 13.
6. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Haper R, et al. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 51 : 1115 1128.
7. Lemon SM, Mahmoud AA. The threat of pandemic influenza: are we ready? Biosecur Bioterror 2005 3 : 70 3.
8. Kim MH, Cho YS, Uhm WS, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EQ-5D in patients with rheumatic diseases. Qual Life Res 2005 14 : 1401 1406.
9. Jo MW, Yun SC, Lee SI. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D health states with the time trade-off method in South Korea. Value Health 2008 11 : 1186 1189.
10. Korea National Statistical Office. Resident of Registration Population (As of December 31, 2006). Daejeon : Korea National Statistical Office, 2007.
11. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997 35 : 1095 1108.
12. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005 43 : 203 220.
13. Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ 2002 11 : 341 353.
14. Dolan P, Kind P. Inconsistency and health state valuations. Soc Sci Med 1996 42 : 609 615.
15. Ohinmaa A, Sintonen H. Inconsistencies and modelling of the Finnish EuroQol (EQ-5D) preference values. In : Greiner W, Graf von dem Schulenburg JM, Piercy J, eds. EuroQol Plenary Meeting, Hannover, 1st-2nd October. Hannover : Uvi-Verlag Witte, 1999.
16. Lamers LM. The transformation of utilities for health states worse than death: consequences for the estimation of EQ-5D value sets. Med Care 2007 45 : 238 244.
17. Long JS, Ervin LH. Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. Am Stat 2000 54 : 217 224.