Breast cancer characteristics associated with digital versus film-screen mammography for screen-detected and interval cancers

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 205, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 676-684

  Henderson, Louise M ^a   Miglioretti, Diana L ^b   Kerlikowske, Karla ^c   Wernli, Karen J ^d   Sprague, Brian L ^e   Lehman, Constance D ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital mammography; Film mammography; Interval cancer; Screen detected cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR POSITIVE BREAST CANCER; FEMALE; FILM SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR POSITIVE BREAST CANCER; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH SURVEY; INCIDENCE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REGISTER; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; REGISTRIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84942626503     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13904     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kirsh VA, Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA, et al. Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103:942-950
2. Domingo L, Romero A, Belvis F, et al. Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:2020-2028
3. Raja MA, Hubbard A, Salman AR. Interval breast cancer: is it a different type of breast cancer? Breast 2001; 10:100-108
4. Vitak B, Olsen KE, Manson JC, Arnesson LG, Stal O. Tumour characteristics and survival in patients with invasive interval breast cancer classified according to mammographic findings at the latest screening: a comparison of true interval and missed interval cancers. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:460-469
5. Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ, et al. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:774-781
6. Hofvind S, Geller B, Skaane P. Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers. Acta Radiol 2008; 49:975-981
7. U.S. Department of Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. Radiation-emitting products: MQSA national statistics. www.fda. gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/Mammography QualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ucm113858.htm. Accessed March 12, 2014
8. Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155:493-502
9. Nederend J, Duijm LE, Louwman MW, et al. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment: a population based study from The Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:31-39
10. Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR 1997; 169:1001-1008
11. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium website. BCSC glossary of terms. breastscreening.cancer. gov/data/bcsc-data-definitions.pdf. Updated September 16, 2009. Accessed May 18, 2015
12. Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006; 241:55-66
13. Taplin SH, Ichikawa LE, Kerlikowske K, et al. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 2002; 222:529-535
14. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998
15. Geller BM, Ichikawa LE, Buist DS, et al. Improving the concordance of mammography assessment and management recommendations. Radiology 2006; 241:67-75
16. Hoff SR, Abrahamsen AL, Samset JH, Vigeland E, Klepp O, Hofvind S. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-results from a retrospective review. Radiology 2012; 264:378-386
17. Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O'Doherty A, Flanagan FL. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. AJR 2009; 193:1010-1018
18. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009; 253:353-358
19. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:183-191
20. Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, Dos Santos Silva IM. Fullfield digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology 2009; 251:347-358
21. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1773-1783
22. Porter PL, El-Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT, et al. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:2020-2028
23. Hakama M, Holli K, Isola J, et al. Aggressiveness of screen-detected breast cancers. Lancet 1995; 345:221-224
24. Tabár L, Faberberg G, Day NE, Holmberg L. What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish twocounty breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer 1987; 55:547-551
25. Drukker CA, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJ, et al. Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 144:103-111