Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 975-981

  Hofvind, S ^a   Geller, B ^a   Skaane, P ^a  

^a Cancer Registry of Norway ^*

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Histopathogical findings; Interval cancer; Mammographic features; Mammography

Indexed keywords

BIOMINERALIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; PROGRAM INTERPRETERS;

BREAST CANCER SCREENING; BREAST CANCERS; HISTOPATHOGICAL FINDINGS; INTERVAL CANCER; INVASIVE TUMORS; LYMPH NODES; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES; MISSED CANCERS; SCREENING MAMMOGRAMS; SCREENING PROGRAMS; SYSTEMATIC COLLECTIONS; TRUE NEGATIVES; WITH OR WITHOUT;

TUMORS;

AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LYMPH NODE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 54349116757     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850802403730     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Perry N, Breeders M, deWolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Brussels: European Communities; 2006.
2. Hofvind S, Geller B, Vacek P, Thoresen S, Skaane P. Using the European Guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Eur J Epidemiol 2007;22:447-55.
3. Vitak B, Olsen KE, Manson JC, Arnesson LG, Stal O. Tumour characteristics and survival in patients with invasive interval breast cancer classified according to mammographic findings at the latest screening: a comparison of true interval and missed interval cancers. Eur Radiol 1999;9:460-9.
4. Porter PL, El Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT, Lin MG, Khalid N, Watney EA, et al. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:2020-8.
5. Shen Y, Yang Y, Inoue LY, Munsell MF, Miller AB, Berry DA. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1195-203.
6. Zackrisson S, Janzon L, Manjer L, Andersson I. Improved survival rate for women with interval breast cancer-results from the breast cancer screening programme in Malmö, Sweden 1976-1999. J Med Screen 2007;14:138-43.
7. Moberg K, Grundstrom H, Tornberg S, Lundquist H, Svane G, Havervall L, et al. Two models for radiological reviewing of interval cancers. J Med Screen 1999;6:35-9.
8. Hofvind S, Skaane P, Vitak B, Wang H, Thoresen S, Eriksen L, et al. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2005;237:437-43.
9. de Rijke JM, Schouten LJ, Schreutelkamp JL, Jochem I, Verbeek AL. A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the Netherlands. J Med Screen 2000;7: 19-23.
10. Ciatto S, Catarzi S, Lamberini MP, Risso G, Saguatti G, Abbattista T, et al. Interval breast cancers in screening: the effect of mammography review method on classification. Breast 2007; 16:646-52.
11. The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Regulations on the collection and processing of personal health data in the Cancer Registry of Norway (Cancer Registry Regulations). Oslo: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs: 2001.
12. Wang H, Bjurstam N, Bjørndal H, Bråten A, Eriksen L, Skaane P, et al. Interval cancers in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program: frequency, characteristics and use of HRT. Int J Cancer 2001;94:594-8.
13. The Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2006. Report. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2007.
14. D'Orsi C, Bassett L, Berg W, Feig SA, Jackson JA, Kopans D, et al. Breast imaging and reporting data system-mammography. 4th edition. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
15. Bnlliard JL, Sasieni P, Klabunde C, De Landtsheer JP, Yankaskas BC, Fracheboud J. Methodological issues in international comparison of interval breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2006;119:1158-63.
16. Törnberg S, Codd M, Rodrigues V, Segnan N, Ponti A. Ascertainment and evaluation of interval cancers in population-based mammography screening programmes: a collaborative study in four European centres. J Med Screen 2005;12:43-9.
17. Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas B, Abraham LA, Sickles EA, Lehman CD, Geller BM, et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006;241:55-66.
18. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. Am J Roentgenol 1986;146: 661-3.
19. Tabar L, Tot T, Dean P. Breast cancer. The art of science of early detection with mammography. Stuttgart: Thieme International; 2005.
20. Breeders MJ, Onland-Moret NC, Rijken HJ, Hendriks JH, Verbeek AL, Holland R. Use of previous screening mammograms to identify features indicating cases that would have a possible gain in prognosis following earlier detection. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1770-5.
21. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992;184:613-7.
22. Vitak B. Invasive interval cancers in the Ostergotland Mammographic Screening Programme: radiological analysis. Eur Radiol 1998;8:639-46.
23. Tabar L, Tot T, Dean P. Breast cancer. Early detection with mammography. Casting type calcification: sign of subtype with descriptive features. Stuttgart: Thieme International; 2007.
24. Sickles EA. Breast calcifications: mammographie evaluation. Radiology 1986;160:289-93.
25. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of "early" breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:461-4.
26. Evans AJ, Kutt E, Record C, Waller M, Moss S. Radiological findings of screen-detected cancers in a multi-centre randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40 to 48 years. Clin Radiol 2006;61:784-8.
27. Malich A, Fischer DBJ. CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1449-60.
28. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcification: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2679-83.
29. Balleyguier C, Ayadi S, Van Nguyen K, Vanel D, Dromain C, Sigal R. BIRADS classification in mammography. Eur J Radiol 2007;61:192-4.
30. Geller BM, Ichikawa LE, Buist DS, Sickles EA, Carney PA, Yankaskas BC, et al. Improving the concordance of mammography assessment and management recommendations. Radiology 2006;241:67-75.
31. Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Burrell HC, Lee AH, Ellis IO, Chakrabarti J. Interval breast cancers: prognostic features and survival by subtype and time since screening. J Med Screen 2006;13:115-22.
32. Brekelmans CT, van Gorp JM, Peeters PH, Collette HJ. Histopathology and growth rate of interval breast carcinoma. Characterization of different subgroups. Cancer 1996;78:1220-8.
33. Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:377-84.
34. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1399-409.