Improving the concordance of mammography assessment and management recommendations

Radiology

Volumn 241, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-75

  Geller, Berta M ^a   Ichikawa, Laura E ^b   Buist, Diana S M ^b   Sickles, Edward A ^c   Carney, Patricia A ^d   Yankaskas, Bonnie C ^e   Dignan, Mark ^f   Kerlikowske, Karla ^c   Yabroff, K Robin ^g   Barlow, William ^b   Rosenberg, Robert D ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NORRIS COTTON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^f Cooper Institute ^*  (United States)

^g NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER SURVEILLANCE CONSORTIUM; BREAST DISEASE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER REGISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY STANDARDS ACT; MANTEL HAENSZEL TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33748951735     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2411051375     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Food and Drug Administration. Quality mammography standards: final rules-21 CFR parts 16 and 900. Docket no. 95N-0192, RIN 0910-AA24 edition. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, 1997; 55925-55926.
2. D'Orsi C, Bassett L, Feig S, et al. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system. 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998.
3. Geller BM, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology 2002;222(2):536-542.
4. Taplin SH, Ichikawa LE, Kerlikowske K, et al. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 2002;222(2):529-535.
5. Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin S, Yankaskas B, et al. Breast cancer surveillance consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1001-1008.
6. Carney PA, Geller BM, Moffett H, et al. Medico-legal issues and protective policies and procedures for data integrity and confidentiality in a large multi-center research program: the National Cancer Institute's Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:371-378.
7. Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 2005;235:775-790.
8. D'Orsi C, Bassett L, Berg W, et al. American College of Radiology BI-RADS breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. Reston. Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.