The influence of attitudes on Transit-Oriented Development: An explorative analysis

Transport Policy

Volumn 35, Issue , 2014, Pages 326-329

  De Vos, Jonas ^a   Van Acker, Veronique ^a   Witlox, Frank ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Residential self selection; Transit Oriented Development; Travel behaviour; Travel mode choice; Travel related attitudes

Indexed keywords

NEIGHBORHOOD; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84907594949     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bertolini L. Spatial development patterns and public transport: the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Plan. Pract. Res. 1999, 14(2):199-210.
2. Bhat C.R., Guo J.Y. A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp. Res. B 2007, 41:506-526.
3. Brueckner J.K. Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2000, 23(2):160-171.
4. Calthorpe P. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream 1993, Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton.
5. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation 2007, 34:535-556.
6. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29(3):359-395.
7. Cervero R. Traditional neighborhoods and commuting in the San Francisco bay area. Transportation 1996, 23(4):373-394.
8. Cervero R. Transit-oriented development[U+05F3]s ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies. Environ. Plan. A 2007, 39(9):2068-2085.
9. Cervero R., Kang C.D. Bus rapid transit impacts on land uses and land values in Seoul, Korea. Transp. Policy 2011, 18(1):102-116.
10. Cervero R. The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry 1998, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
11. Cervero R. Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges and Prospects 2004, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
12. CTOD (Center for Transit-Oriented Development), 2010. Performance-based transit-oriented development typology guidebook. Accessible at: . http://www.ctod.org.
13. Curtis C. Evolution of the transit-oriented development model for low-density cities: a case study of Perth[U+05F3]s new railway corridor. Plan. Pract. Res. 2008, 23(3):285-302.
14. Curtis C., Olaru D. The relevance of traditional town planning concepts for travel minimization. Plan. Pract. Res. 2010, 25(1):49-75.
15. Curtis C., Renne J.L., Bertolini L. Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen 2009, Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, UK.
16. De Vos J., Derudder B., Van Acker V., Witlox F. Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 22:1-9.
17. De Vos J., Witlox F. Transportation policy as spatial planning tool; reducing urban sprawl by increasing travel costs and clustering infrastructure and public transportation. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 33:117-125.
18. Dittmar H., Belzer D., Autler A. An introduction to transit-oriented development. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, D.C. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
19. Ewing R., Cervero R. Travel and the built environment. A meta-analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2010, 76(3):265-294.
20. Glaeser E., Kahn M. Sprawl and urban growth. Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics 2004, 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Guo J.Y., Chen C. The built environment and travel behavior: making the connection. Transportation 2007, 34(5):529-533.
22. Handy S.L., Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L. Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. D 2005, 10(6):427-444.
23. Kamruzzaman M., Baker D., Washington S., Turrell G. Residential dissonance and mode choice. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 33:12-28.
24. Kamruzzaman M., Washington S., Baker D., Turrell G. Does residential dissonance impact residential mobility?. Transp. Res. Rec. 2013, 2344:59-67.
25. Kamruzzaman M., Baker D., Washington S., Turrell G. Advance transit oriented development typology: case study in Brisbane, Australia. J. Transp. Geogr. 2014, 34:54-70.
26. Knowles R.D. Transit oriented development in Copenhagen, Denmark: from the finger plan to Ørestad. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 22:251-261.
27. Loo B.P.Y. How would people respond to a new railway extension? The value of questionnaire surveys. Habitat Int. 2009, 33(1):1-9.
28. Loo B.P.Y., Chen C., Chan E.T.H. Rail-based transit-oriented development: lessons from New York City and Hong Kong. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 97:202-212.
29. Lund H. Reasons for living in a transit-oriented development, and associated transit use. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2006, 72(3):357-366.
30. Mokhtarian P.L., Cao X. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transp. Res. B 2008, 43(3):204-228.
31. Mu R., de Jong M. Establishing the conditions for effective transit-oriented development in China: the case of Dalian. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 24:234-249.
32. Newman P., Kenworthy J.R. The land use-transport connection: an overview. Land Use Policy 1996, 13(1):1-22.
33. Olaru D., Smith B., Taplin J.H.E. Residential location and transit-oriented development in a new rail corridor. Transp. Res. Part A 2011, 45(3):219-237.
34. Renne J.L. From transit-adjacent to transit-oriented development. Local Environ. 2009, 14(1):1-15.
35. Schlossberg M., Brown N. Comparing transit-oriented development sites by walkability indicators. Transp. Res. Rec. 2004, 1887:34-42.
36. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environ. Plan. B 2004, 31(5):759-784.
37. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods?. J. Transp. Geogr. 2005, 13(1):83-99.
38. Singh Y.J., Fard P., Zuidgeest M., Brussel M., van Maarseveen M. Measuring transit oriented development: a spatial multi criteria assessment approach for the City Region Arnhem and Nijmegen. J. Transp. Geogr. 2014, 35:130-143.
39. Smith H., Raemaekers J. Land use pattern and transport in Curitiba. Land Use Policy 1998, 15(3):233-251.
40. Stojanovski, T., Lundström, M.J., Haas, T., 2012. Light railways and busways as key driver for sustainable urban development: the Swedish experiences with transit-oriented development (TOD). In: Proceedings of the Annual Transport Conference, Aalborg University.
41. Sung H., Oh J.-T. Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea. Cities 2011, 28(1):70-82.
42. van Wee B. Self-selection: a key to a better understanding of location choices, travel behaviour and transport externalities?. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29:279-292.
43. Zemp S., Stauffacher M., Lang D.J., Scholz R.W. Classifying railway stations for strategic transport and land use planning: context matters!. J. Transp. Geogr. 2011, 19:670-679.