Walking for purpose and pleasure influences of light rail, built environment, and residential self-selection on pedestrian travel

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2464, Issue , 2014, Pages 67-76

  Schoner, Jessica ^a   Cao, Xinyu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING; PLANNING; POPULATION STATISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ACCESS STATIONS; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; CARRY-OVER EFFECTS; LIGHT RAIL; MINNEAPOLIS; MINNESOTA; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RAIL TRANSIT; SHOPPING TRIP; STREET NETWORK;

LAND USE;

EID: 84938600700     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2464-09     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. FHWA. Report to the U.S. Congress on the Outcomes of the Non-Motorized Transportation Pilot Program SAFETEA-LU Section I807. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012.
2. Pucher, J., R. Buehler, D.R. Bassett, and A.L. Dannenberg. Walking and Cycling to Health: A Comparative Analysis of City, State, and International Data. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 100. No. 10. 2010. pp. 1986-1992.
3. Páez, A., and K. Whalen. Enjoyment of Commute: A Comparison of Different Transportation Modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44. No. 7. 2010. pp. 537-549.
4. Litman. T. A. Economic Value of Walkability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Hoard. No. 1828. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. pp. 3-11.
5. Campbell, R., and M. Wittgens. The Business Case for Active Transportation: The Economic Benefits of Walking and Cycling. Go tor Green, Gloucester, Ontario, Canada, 2004.
6. Lachapelle, U., and R. B. Noland. Does the Commute Mode Affect the Frequency of Walking Behavior? The Public Transit Link. Transport Policy. Vol. 21,2012, pp. 26-36.
7. MacDonald, J.M., R.J. Stokes. D.A. Cohen, A. Kofner, and G.K. Ridgeway. The Effect of Light Rail Transit on Body Mass Index and Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. Vol. 39. No. 2. 2010. pp. 105-112.
8. Brown, B.B., and C.M. Werner. A New Rail Stop: Tracking Moderate Physical Activity Bouts and Ridership. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. Vol. 33. No. 4. 2007. pp. 306-309.
9. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76. No. 3. 2010. pp. 265-294.
10. Cao, X., P.L. Mokhtarian, and S.L. Handy. The Relationship Between the Built Environment and Nonwork Travel: A Case Study of Northern California. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 43. No. 5. 2009. pp. 548-559.
11. Sommer, B. B. and R. Sommer. A Practical Guide to Behavioral Research: Tools and Techniques. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 1997.
12. Babbie, E. R. The Practice of Social Research, 8th ed. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, Calif., 1998.
13. Cao, X., S.L. Handy, and P.L. Mokhtarian. The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation, Vol. 33. No. 1. 2006. pp. 1-20.
14. Sehatzadeh, B., R. B. Noland, and M.D. Weiner. Walking Frequency, Cars, Dogs, and the Built Environment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. Vol. 45. No. 8. 2011. pp. 741-754.
15. Lee, C, and A. Vernez Moudon. Neighbourhood Design and Physical Activity. Building Research and Information, Vol. 36. No. 5. 2008. pp. 395-411.
16. Job, K. M.T. Nguyen, and M.G. Boarnet, Can Built and Social Environmental Factors Encourage Walking Among Individuals with Negative Walking Attitudes'.' Journal of Planning Education and Research. Vol. 32. No. 2. 2011. pp. 219-236.
17. Lee, C, and A. Vernez Moudon. Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. Vol. 3. No. Suppl. 1. 2006. pp. 77-98.
18. Handy, S.L., X. Cao, and P.L. Mokhtarian. Self-Selection in the Relationship Between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol. 72. No. 1. 2006. pp. 55-74.