Is alternative development undersupplied?: Examination of residential preferences and choices of Northern California movers

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2077, 2008, Pages 97-105

  Cao, Xinyu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING;

CALIFORNIA; CONSUMER CHOICE; NEW STUDY; PRIORITY OF TRANSPORTATIONS; RESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE; STATED CHOICE METHODS; TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

LAND USE;

EID: 61349132020     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2077-13     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boarnet, M. G., and R. Crane. Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
2. Levine, J., and A. Inam. The Market for Transportation-Land Use Integration: Do Developers Want Smarter Growth Than Regulations Allow? Transportation, Vol. 31, 2004, pp. 409-427.
3. Train, K. Discrete Choice Models with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, London, 2003.
4. National Survey on Communities Conducted for Smart Growth America and National Association of Realtors. Beiden Russonello & Stewart Research and Communications. 2004. www.commutesolutions-hou.com/resources/NAR- SGA%20Commuter%20Survey.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2007.
5. Bina, M., V. Warburg, and K. M. Kockelman. Location Choice vis-àvis Transportation: Apartment Dwellers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. .1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 93-102.
6. Levine, J., and L. D. Frank. Transportation and Land-Use Preferences and Residents' Neighborhood Choices: The Sufficiency of Compact Development in the Atlanta Region. Transportation, Vol. 34, 2007, pp. 255-274.
7. Levine, J., A. Inam, and G. Torng. A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives: Evidence from Boston and Atlanta. Journal of Planning Educating and Research, Vol. 34, 2005, pp. 317-330.
8. Ahluwahlia, G. Public Attitudes Toward Growth. Housing Economics, Vol. 47, 1999, pp. 7-12.
9. Morrow-Jones, H. A., E. G. Irwin, and B. Roe. Consumer Preference for Neotraditional Neighborhood Characteristics. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 15, 2004, pp. 171-202.
10. Hensher, D. A. Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: The State of Practice. Transportation, Vol. 21, 1994, pp. 107-133.
11. Song, Y., and G. Knaap. New Urbanism and Housing Values: A Disaggregate Assessment. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 54, 2003, pp. 218-238.
12. Meyers, D., and E. Gearin. Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential Environments. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 12, 2001, pp. 633-658.
13. Schwanen, T., and P. Mokhtarian. The Extent and Determinants of Dissonance Between Actual and Preferred Residential Neighborhood Type. Environment and Planning B, Vol. 31, 2004, pp. 759-784.
14. Lovejoy, K. Do Suburban- and Traditional-Neighborhood Residents Want Different Things? Evidence on Neighborhood Satisfaction and Travel. Behavior. M.S. thesis. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 2006.
15. Hunt, J. D., J. D. P. McMillan, and J. E. Abraham. Stated Preference Investigation of Influences on Attractiveness of Residential Locations. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 79-87.
16. Rossi, P. H. Why Families Move, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1980.
17. Bina, M., K. M. Kockelman, and D. Suescun. Location Choice vis-à-vis Transportation: The Case of Recent Home Buyers. Presented at 11th International Association of Travel Behavior Research Meeting, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
18. Filion, P., T. Bunting, and K. Warriner. The Entrenchment of Urban Dispersion: Residential Preferences and Location Patterns in the Dispersed City. Urban Studies, Vol. 36, 1999, pp. 1317-1347.
19. Plaut, P. O. The Intra-Household Choices Regarding Commuting and Housing. Transportation Research. A, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 561-571.
20. Handy, S. L., P. L. Mokhtarian, T. J. Buehler, and X. Cao. Residential Location Choice and Travel Behavior: Implications for Air Quality. Caltrans Air Quality Project 54. University of California, Davis, 2004. aqp.engr.ucdavis.edu/Documents/Final-report-editted-updatedl.pdf.
21. Sommer, B., and R. Sommer. A Practical Guide to Behavioral. Research: Tools and Techniques, 4th ed. Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.
22. Cervero, R. Job-Housing Balance Revisited: Trends and Impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.62, 1996, pp. 492-551.