In silico evolution of diauxic growth

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Chu, Dominique F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diauxic growth; Glucose effect; Simulated evolution

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BACTERIUM; BIOMASS; CARBON; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GLUCOSE; GROWTH RESPONSE; METABOLISM; NUMERICAL MODEL; NUTRIENT UPTAKE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

GLUCOSE;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYTOLOGY; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETIC FITNESS; GLUCOSE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84942432514     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0492-0     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Monod J. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1949; 3:371-49.
2. Stülke J, Hillen W. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999; 2(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80034-4.
3. Brückner R, Titgemeyer F. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: choice of the carbon source and autoregulatory limitation of sugar utilization. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002; 209(2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(02)00559-1.
4. Boulineau S, Tostevin F, Kiviet D, ten Wolde P, Nghe P, Tans S. Single-cell dynamics reveals sustained growth during diauxic shifts. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):61686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061686.
5. Boianelli A, Bidossi A, Gualdi L, Mulas L, Mocenni C, Pozzi G, et al. A non-linear deterministic model for regulation of diauxic lag on cellobiose by the pneumococcal multidomain transcriptional regulator celr. PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):47393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047393.
6. Inada T, Kimata K, Aiba H. Mechanism responsible for glucose-lactose diauxie in Escherichia coli: challenge to the cAMP model. Genes Cells. 1996; 1(3):293-301.
7. Kompala D, Ramkrishna D, Jansen N, Tsao G. Investigation of bacterial growth on mixed substrates: Experimental evaluation of cybernetic models. Biotech Bioeng. 1986; 28(7):1044-55. doi: 10.1002/bit.260280715.
8. New A, Cerulus B, Govers S, Perez-Samper G, Zhu B, Boogmans S, et al. Different levels of catabolite repression optimize growth in stable and variable environments. PLoS Biology. 2014; 12(1):1001764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001764.
9. Narang A. Comparative analysis of some models of gene regulation in mixed-substrate microbial growth. J Theor Biol. 2006; 242(2):489-501.
10. Narang A, Pilyugin S. Bacterial gene regulation in diauxic and non-diauxic growth. J Theor Biol. 2007; 244(2):326-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.08.007.
11. Kremling A, Kremling S, Bettenbrock K. Catabolite repression in escherichia coli- a comparison of modelling approaches. FEBS J. 2009; 276(2):594-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06810.x.
12. Deutscher J. The mechanisms of carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008; 11(2):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.007.
13. Zabet N, Chu D. Computational limits to binary genes. J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7(47):945-54. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0474.
14. Dekel E, Alon U. Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature. 2005; 436(7050):588-92. doi: 10.1038/nature03842.
15. Kalisky T, Dekel E, Alon U. Cost-benefit theory and optimal design of gene regulation functions. Phys Biol. 2007; 4(4):229.
16. Thattai M, van Oudenaarden A. Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics. 2004; 167(1):523-30.
17. Bennett A, Lenski R. An experimental test of evolutionary trade-offs during temperature adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007; 104(suppl 1):8649-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702117104.
18. Lestas I, Paulsson J, Ross N, Vinnicombe G. Noise in gene regulatory networks. Automatic Control IEEE Trans. 2008; 53(Special Issue):189-200.
19. Chu D, Zabet N, Hone A. Optimal parameter settings for information processing in gene regulatory networks. BioSystems. 2011; 104:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2011.01.006.
20. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland Science; 2002.
21. Chu D, Zabet N, Mitavskiy B. Models of transcription factor binding: sensitivity of activation functions to model assumptions. J Theor Biol. 2009; 257(3):419-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.11.026.
22. Pfeiffer T, Schuster S, Bonhoeffer S. Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science. 2001; 292(5516):504-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1058079.
23. Eigen M, McCaskill J, Schuster P. The molecular quasi-species. Adv Chem Phys. 1989; 75:149-263.
24. Jasmin J, Dillon MM, Zeyl C. The yield of experimental yeast populations declines during selection. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2012; 279(1746):4382-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1659. http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/279/1746/4382.full.pdf+html.
25. Molenaar D, van Berlo R, de Ridder D, Teusink B. Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics. Mol Syst Biol. 2009; 5:323. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.82.
26. Gottstein W, Müller S, Herzel H, Steuer R. Elucidating the adaptation and temporal coordination of metabolic pathways using in-silico evolution. Biosystems. 2014; 117(0):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.12.006.
27. Alon U, Surette M, Barkai N, Leibler S. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1999; 397:168-71.
28. Rao C, Wolf D, Arkin A. Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise. Nature. 2002; 420:231-7.
29. Samoilov M, Plyasunov S, Arkin A. Stochastic amplification and signaling in Enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced Bistability with oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102(7):2310-315.
30. Li F, Lu Y, Tang C. The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101(14):4781-6.
31. Bennett C. On the nature and origin of complexity in discrete, homogeneous, locally-interacting systems. Found Phys. 1986; 16(6):585-92.
32. Szekely P, Sheftel H, Mayo A, Alon U. Evolutionary tradeoffs between economy and effectiveness in biological homeostasis systems. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(8):1003163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003163.
33. Elena S, Lenski R. Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet. 2003; 4(6):457-69. doi: 10.1038/nrg1088.
34. Francois P, Hakim V. Design of genetic networks with specified functions by evolution in silico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101(2):580-5. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/101/2/580.pdf.
35. Jenkins D, Stekel D. De novo evolution of complex, global and hierarchical gene regulatory mechanisms. J Mol Evol. 2010; 71(2):128-40.
36. Stekel D, Jenkins D. Evolution of resource and energy management in biologically realistic gene regulatory network models. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012; 751:301-28.
37. Chu D. Replaying the tape of evolution: Evolving parameters for a simple bacterial metabolism. In: Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2013 IEEE Congress On: 2013. p. 213-20. doi: 10.1109/CEC.2013.6557573.
38. Chu D. Evolving parameters for a noisy bio-systems. In: 2013 IEEE Symposion Series on Computational Intelligence: 2013.
39. Goldberg D. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley; 1989.