Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2970-2983

  Koehn, Jacqueline K ^a   Kuchenbecker, Katherine J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Audio feedback; Haptic feedback; Robotic surgery; Vibrotactile

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PERSONNEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESIDENT; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TACTILE FEEDBACK; VIBRATION; DEVICES; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TOUCH;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGEONS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; TOUCH; VIBRATION;

EID: 84942311696     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4030-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. TM telesurgery system: overview and application. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2000.844121
2. DiMaio S, Hanuschik M, Kreaden U (2011) The da Vinci surgical system. In: Rosen J, Hannaford B, Satava RM (eds) Surgical robotics: systems application and visions. Springer, New York, pp 199–217
3. Okamura AM (2009) Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Curr Opin Urol. doi:10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831a478c
4. Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2009) Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci. doi:10.1038/nrn2621
5. Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive Surgery. J Am Coll Surg. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00184-2
6. Intuitive Surgical Inc. (2013) Annual Report 2013, Delaware, USA, p. 46
7. van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP (2009) The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x
8. Bethea BT, Okamura AM, Kitagawa M, Fitton TP, Cattaneo SM, Gott VL et al (2004) Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. doi:10.1089/1092642041255441
9. Simorov A, Otte RS, Kopietz CM, Oleynikov D (2012) Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery? Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2182-y
10. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Schemmer P, BÃŒchler MW (2004) Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. doi:10.1002/bjs.4700
11. Hagen ME, Meehan JJ, Inan I, Morel P (2008) Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9683-0
12. Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM, Yuh DD (2005) Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.05.029
13. Culjat M, King CH, Franco M, Bisley J, Grundfest W, Dutson E (2008) Pneumatic balloon actuators for tactile feedback in robotic surgery. Ind Robot. doi:10.1108/01439910810893617
14. King C-H, Culjat MO, Franco ML, Lewis CE, Dutson EP, Grundfest WS, Bisley JW (2009) Tactile feedback induces reduced grasping force in robot-assisted surgery. IEEE Trans Haptics. doi:10.1109/ToH.2009.4
15. Wagner CR, Howe RD (2007) Force feedback benefit depends on experience in multiple degree of freedom robotic surgery task. IEEE Trans Robot. doi:10.1109/Tro.2007.904891
16. Puangmali P, Althoefer K, Seneviratne LD, Murphy D, Dasgupta P (2008) State-of-the-art in force and tactile sensing for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Sens J. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2008.917481
17. Madhani AJ, Niemeyer G, Salisbury JK (1998) The Black Falcon: a teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. doi:10.1109/IROS.1998.727320
18. Mahvash M, Okamura A (2007) Friction compensation for enhancing transparency of a teleoperator with compliant transmission. IEEE Trans Robot. doi:10.1109/TRO.2007.909825
19. Mahvash M, Gwilliam J, Agarwal R, Vagvolgyi B, Su L-M, Yuh DD, Okamura AM (2008) Force-feedback surgical teleoperator: controller design and palpation experiments. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems. doi:10.1109/HAPTICS.2008.4479994
20. Culjat MO, Bisley JW, King C, Wottawa C, Fan RE, Dutson EP, Grundfest WS (2011) Chapter 18: tactile feedback in surgical robotics. In: Rosen J, Hannaford B, Satava RM (eds) Surgical robotics: system applications and visions. Springer, New York City, pp 449–468
21. Myles KP, Binseel MS (2009) Chapter 19: exploring the tactile modality for HMDs. In: Rash CE, Russo MB, Letowski TR, Schmeisser ET (eds) Helmet-mounted displays: sensation, perception and cognition issues. SPIE Press, Bellingham, pp 849–876
22. Kontarinis D, Howe RD (1995) Tactile display of vibratory information in teleoperation and virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 4(4):387–401
23. McMahan W, Kuchenbecker KJ (2009) Haptic display of realistic tool contact via dynamically compensated control of a dedicated actuator. Proceedings of IEEE/JRS International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. doi:10.1109/IROS.2009.5354607
24. McMahan W, Romano JM, Rahuman AMA, Kuchenbecker KJ (2010) High frequency acceleration feedback significantly increases the realism of haptically rendered textured surfaces. Proceedings of IEEE Haptics Symposium. doi:10.1109/HAPTIC.2010.5444665
25. McMahan W, Gewirtz J, Standish D, Martin P, Kunkel J, Lilavois M, Wedmid A, Lee DI, Kuchenbecker KJ (2011) Tool contact acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery. IEEE Trans Haptics. doi:10.1109/TOH.2011.31
26. Bark K, McMahan W, Remington A, Gewirtz J, Wedmid A, Lee DI, Kuchenbecker KJ (2012) In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2452-8
27. Peters J, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Sillin LF, Schirmer B, Hoffman K, SAGES FLS Committee (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. doi:10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00156-9
28. McMahan W, Gomez ED, Chen L, Bark K, Nappo JC, Koch EI, Lee DI, Dumon K, Williams N, Kuchenbecker KJ (2013) A practical system for recording instrument interactions during live robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. doi:10.1007/s11701-013-0399-y
29. Gomez ED, Bark K, Rivera C, McMahan M, Remington A, Lee DI, Williams NN, Kenric MM, Dumon KR, Kuchenbecker K (2012) Construct validity of instrument vibrations as a measure of robotic surgical skill. J Am Coll Surg 215(3):S119–S120
30. Lee AY (2001) The mere exposure effect: an uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Per Soc Psychol Bull. doi:10.1177/01461672012710002