In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 656-664

  Bark, Karlin ^a   McMahan, William ^a   Remington, Austin ^a   Gewirtz, Jamie ^a   Wedmid, Alexei ^b   Lee, David I ^b   Kuchenbecker, Katherine J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedical; Feedback sensory; Robotics instrumentation; Technology assessment; Touch

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPEN SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TRANSPERITONEAL APPROACH; URETEROURETEROSTOMY; UROLOGICAL PROCEDURE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VIBRATION;

EID: 84875866717     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2452-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. DiMaio S, Hanuschik M, Kreaden U (2011) The da Vinci Surgical System. In: Rosen J, Hannaford B, Satava RM (eds) Surgical robotics. Springer, New York, pp 199-218
2. Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 189:349-355
3. Sung GT, Gill IS (2001) Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 58:893-898
4. Meireles O, Horgan S (2011) Applications of surgical robotics in general surgery. In: Rosen J, Hannaford B, Satava RM (eds) Surgical robotics. Springer, New York, pp 791-812
5. Costi R, Himpens J, Bruyns J, Cadière GB (2003) Robotic fundoplication: from theoretic advantages to real problems. J Am Coll Surg 197:500-507
6. Nezhat F (2008) Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics. Gynecol Oncol 111:S29-S32
7. Okamura AM, Verner LN, Yamamoto T, Gwilliam JC, Griffiths PG (2011) Force feedback and sensory substitution for robot-assisted surgery. In: Rosen J, Hannaford B, Satava RM (eds) Surgical robotics. Springer, New York, pp 419-448
8. Culjat MO, Bisley JW, King CH, Wottawa C, Fan RE, Dutson EP, Grundfest WS (2011) Tactile feedback in surgical robotics. In: Rosen J, Hannaford B, Satava RM (eds) Surgical robotics. Springer, New York, pp 449-468
9. Hagen ME, Meehan JJ, Inan I, Morel P (2008) Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:1505-1508
10. Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 3:159-177
11. Vitense HS, Jacko JA, Emery VK (2003) Multimodal feedback: an assessment of performance and mental workload. Ergonomics 46:68-87
12. Prewett MS, Yang L, Stilson FRB, Gray AA, Coovert MD, Burke J, Redden E, Elliot LR (2006) The benefits of multimodal information: a meta-analysis comparing visual and visual-tactile feedback. Proc Multimodal Interfaces 333-338
13. Cao CGL, Zhou M, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg SD (2007) Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time? J Gastrointest Surg 11:1564-1569
14. Mayer H, Nagy I, Knoll A, Braun EU, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R (2007) Haptic feedback in a telepresence system for endoscopic heart surgery. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 16:459-470
15. van der Meijden O, Schijven M (2009) The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surg Endosc 23:1180-1190
16. Tan GY, Goel RK, Kaouk JH, Tewari AK (2009) Technological advances in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Urol Clin N Am 36:237-249
17. Okamura AM (2009) Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Curr Opin Urol 19:102-107
18. Wagner CR, Stylopoulos N, Jackson PG, Howe RD (2007) The benefit of force feedback in surgery: examination of blunt dissection. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 16:252-262
19. King CH, Culjat MO, Franco ML, Lewis CE, Dutson EP, Grundfest WS, Bisley JW (2009) Tactile feedback induces reduced grasping force in robotic surgery. IEEE Trans Haptics 2:103-110
20. Kontarinis DA, Howe RD (1996) Tactile display of vibratory information in teleoperation and virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 4:387-402
21. Johnson KO (2001) The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:455-461
22. Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2009) Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:345-359
23. McMahan W, Romano JM, Rahuman AMA, Kuchenbecker KJ (2010) High frequency acceleration feedback significantly increases the realism of haptically rendered textured surfaces. Proc IEEE Haptics Symp 141-148
24. McMahan W, Gewirtz J, Standish D, Martin P, Kunkel JA, Lilavois M, Wedmid A, Lee DI, Kuchenbecker KJ (2011) Tool contact acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery. IEEE Trans Haptics 4:210-220
25. Hayward V, Maclean KE (2007) Do it yourself haptics: part I. IEEE Robot Automation Mag 14:88-104
26. Kuchenbecker KJ, Gewirtz J, McMahan W, Satndish D, Martin P, Bohren J, Mendoza PJ, Lee DI (2010) VerroTouch: high-frequency acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery. In: Kappers AML, van Erp JBF, Bergmann Tiest WM, van der Helm FCT (eds) Haptics: generating and perceiving tangible sensations. Proceedings of EuroHaptics Part I, vol 6191. Springer, New York, pp 189-196
27. Bethea BT, Okamura AM, Kitagawa M, Fitton TP, Cattaneo SM, Gott VL, Baumgartner WA, Yuh DD (2004) Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:191-195
28. Bark K, Gomez ED, Rivera C, McMahan W, Remington AC, Murayama KM, Lee DI, Dumon KR, Williams NN, Kuchenbecker KJ (2012) Surgical instrument vibrations are a construct-valid measure of technical skill in robotic peg transfer and suturing tasks. In: Yang GZ, Darzi A (eds) Proc. Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics, pp 50-51
29. Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N (2008) Enhanced robotic surgical training using augmented visual feedback. Surg Innov 15:59-68