Why Students Share Misinformation on Social Media: Motivation, Gender, and Study-level Differences

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 583-592

  Chen, Xinran ^a   Sin, Sei Ching Joanna ^a   Theng, Yin Leng ^a   Lee, Chei Sian ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Characteristics of information; Gender differences; Misinformation sharing; Motivation; Social media; Study level differences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942296234     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Agranoff B.W., Davis R.E., Brink J.J. Chemical studies on memory fixation in goldfish. Brain Research 1966, 1(3):303-309. 10.1016/0006-8993(66)90095-3.
2. Allport G.W., Postman L. The psychology of rumor 1947, Holt, Rnehart & Winston, New York.
3. Anagnostopoulos A., Bessi A., Caldarelli G., Del Vicario M., Petroni F., Scala A., et al. Viral misinformation: The role of homophily and polarization Retrieved from, (arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2893). http://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.2893v1.pdf.
4. Anttiroiko A.-V., Savolainen R. Towards library 2.0: The adoption of Web 2.0 technologies in public libraries. Libri 2011, 61(2):87-99. 10.1515/libr.2011.008.
5. Batellier F., Couty I., Picard D., Brillard J.P. Effects of exposing chicken eggs to a cell phone in "call" position over the entire incubation period. Theriogenology 2008, 69(6):737-745. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.12.006.
6. Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., Grimes J.M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(3):264-271. 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001.
7. Bridges L.M. Librarian as professor of social media literacy. Journal of Library Innovation 2012, 3(1):48-65.
8. Broos A. Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2005, 8(1):21-31. 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.21.
9. Brown Firefly Millward The language of love in social media - New rules for brand engagement Retrieved from. http://www.fireflymb.com/Libraries/Social_Media_Study/2010_SocialMediaStudy_SummaryReport.sflb.ashx.
10. Budak C., Agrawal D., Abbadi A.E. Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '11) 2011, 665-674. 10.1145/1963405.1963499.
11. Connaway L.S., Dickey T.J., Radford M.L. "If it is too inconvenient I'm not going after it:" Convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Library & Information Science Research 2011, 33(3):179-190. 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.002.
12. Correa T., Hinsley A.W., de Zúñiga H.G. Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior 2010, 26(2):247-253. 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003.
13. Darley W.K., Smith R.E. Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising response. Journal of Advertising 1995, 24(1):41-56. 10.2307/4188961.
14. DiFonzo N., Bordia P. Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches 2007, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
15. Duggan M., Ellison N.B., Lampe C., Lenhart A., Madden M. Social media update 2014 Retrieved from. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_SocialMediaUpdate20144.pdf.
16. Dunne Á., Lawlor M.-A., Rowley J. Young people's use of online social networking sites - A uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 2010, 4(1):46-58. 10.1108/17505931011033551.
17. Emery D. Maggots on the brain/sushi worms Retrieved from. http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl-brainworms.htm.
18. Farkas M. Information literacy 2.0. American Libraries Retrieved from. http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2011/11/01/information-literacy-2-0.
19. Ferrara E. Manipulation and abuse on social media. SIGWEB Newsletter 2015, (Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.03752). 10.1145/2749279.2749283.
20. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2009, Sage, Los Angeles. 3rd ed.
21. Friggeri A., Adamic L.A., Eckles D., Cheng J. Rumor cascades. Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 2014, 101-110. (Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/download/8122/8110).
22. Frost C. Source credibility: Do we really believe everything we're told?. Aslib Proceedings 2002, 54(4):222-228. 10.1108/00012530210443320.
23. Goldenberg D. How to cook an egg (and create a viral sensation) Retrieved from. http://www.gelfmagazine.com/archives/how_to_cook_an_egg_and_create_a_viral_sensation.php.
24. Guardian Interactive team, Procter R., Vis F., Voss A. How riot rumours spread on Twitter Retrieved from. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2011/dec/07/london-riots-twitter.
25. Guerin B., Miyazaki Y. Analyzing rumors, gossip, and urban legends through their conversational properties. Psychological Record 2006, 56(1):23.
26. Hampton K., Goulet L.S., Rainie L., Purcell K. Social networking sites and our lives Retrieved from. http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP%20-%20Social%20networking%20sites%20and%20our%20lives.pdf.
27. Head A.J., Eisenberg M.B. How college students use the web to conduct everyday life research. First Monday 2011, 16(4). 10.5210/fm.v16i4.3484.
28. Hertwig R., Ortmann A. Deception in experiments: Revisiting the arguments in its defense. Ethics & Behavior 2008, 18(1):59-92.
29. Heverin T., Zach L. Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, 63(1):34-47. 10.1002/asi.21685.
30. Kaplan A.M., Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 2010, 53(1):59-68. 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
31. Karlova N.A., Fisher K.E. A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behaviour. Information Research 2013, 18(1). (Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/18-1/paper573.html).
32. Kim J.H., Kim M.-S., Nam Y. An analysis of self-construals, motivations, Facebook use, and user satisfaction. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 2010, 26(11-12):1077-1099. 10.1080/10447318.2010.516726.
33. Kim S., Oh S. Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(4):716-727. 10.1002/asi.21026.
34. Kim K.-S., Sin S.-C.J. Selecting quality sources: Bridging the gap between the perception and use of information sources. Journal of Information Science 2011, 37(2):178-188. 10.1177/0165551511400958.
35. Kim K.-S., Sin S.-C.J. Social media as information sources: Use and evaluation of information from social media. 2013 OCLC/ALISE research grant report Retrieved from. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/grants/reports/2013/kim2013.pdf.
36. Kim K.-S., Sin S.-C.J. Use of social media in different contexts of information seeking: Effects of sex and problem-solving style. Proceedings of the Information Behaviour Conference (ISIC) 2014 2014, (Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/20-1/isic2/isic24.html).
37. Kim K.-S., Sin S.-C.J., Tsai T.I. Individual differences in social media use for information seeking. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2014, 40(2):171-178.
38. Kim K.-S., Sin S.-C.J., Yoo-Lee E.Y. Undergraduates' use of social media as information sources. College & Research Libraries 2014, 75(4):442-457. 10.5860/crl.75.4.442.
39. Lampe C., Ellison N., Steinfield C. A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '06) 2006, 167-170. 10.1145/1963405.1963499.
40. Lee C.S., Goh D.H.-L., Chua A.Y.K., Ang R.P. Indagator: Investigating perceived gratifications of an application that blends mobile content sharing with gameplay. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(6):1244-1257. 10.1002/asi.21305.
41. Lee C.S., Ma L. News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior 2012, 28(2):331-339. 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002.
42. Lim S. How and why do college students use wikipedia?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(11):2189-2202.
43. Lim S. College students' credibility judgments and heuristics concerning Wikipedia. Information Processing and Management 2013, 49(2):405-419.
44. Lim S., Kwon N. Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?. Library & Information Science Research 2010, 32(3):212-220. 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.01.003.
45. Lim S., Simon C. Credibility judgment and verification behavior of college students concerning Wikipedia. First Monday 2011, 16(4). 10.5210/fm.v16i4.3263.
46. Meyers-Levy J., Maheswaran D. Exploring differences in males' and females' processing strategies. Journal of Consumer Research 1991, 18(1):63-70.
47. Mintz A.P. If it's on the Internet, it must be true. Web of deceit: Misinformation and manipulation in the age of social media 2012, CyberAge Books, Information Today, Inc., Medford, N. J. A.P. Mintz (Ed.).
48. Web of deceit: Misinformation and manipulation in the age of social media 2012, Information Today, Medford, NJ. A.P. Mintz (Ed.).
49. Mitrano T. "It takes only a generation:" Information literacy in the digital age Retrieved from. http://archive-edu.com/page/4840981/2014-10-30/http://www.it.cornell.edu/policies/publications/generation.cfm.
50. Morris M.R., Teevan J., Panovich K. What do people ask their social networks, and why? A survey study of status message Q&A behavior. Proceedings of the 28th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2010, 3:1739-1748.
51. Nahl D., Bilal D. Information and emotion: The emergent affective paradigm in information behavior research and theory 2007, Information Today, Medford.
52. Neuman W.L. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches 2011, Pearson Education, Boston. 7th. ed. International ed.
53. Nov O., Naaman M., Ye C. Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 61(3):555-566. 10.1002/asi.21278.
54. Oh S., Syn S.Y. Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: A comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, Youtube, and Flickr. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2015, 10.1002/asi.23320.
55. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Jiao Q.G., Bostick S.L. Library anxiety: Theory, research, and applications 2004, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Md.
56. Oyeyemi S.O., Gabarron E., Wynn R. Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: A dangerous combination?. Thes BMJ 2014, 349. 10.1136/bmj.g6178.
57. Park J.-H. Differences among university students and faculties in social networking site perception and use: Implications for academic library services. The Electronic Library 2010, 28(3):417-431. 10.1108/02640471011051990.
58. Park N., Kee K.F., Valenzuela S. Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009, 12(6):729-733. 10.1089/cpb.2009.0003.
59. Ratkiewicz J., Conover M., Meiss M., Gonçalves B., Patil S., Flammini A., et al. Detecting and tracking the spread of astroturf memes in microblog streams arXiv preprint arXiv:1011.3768. Retrieved from. http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3768.
60. Rieh S.Y. Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2002, 53(2):145-161. 10.1002/asi.10017.
61. Rodgers S., Harris M.A. Gender and e-commerce: An exploratory study. Journal of Advertising Research 2003, 43(03):322-329. 10.1017/S0021849903030307.
62. Rosnow R.L. Inside rumor - A personal journey. American Psychologist 1991, 46(5):484-496. 10.1037/0003-066x.46.5.484.
63. Ross C., Orr E.S., Sisic M., Arseneault J.M., Simmering M.G., Orr R.R. Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior 2009, 25(2):578-586. 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024.
64. Ruggiero T.E. Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society 2000, 3(1):3-37. 10.1207/s15327825mcs0301_02.
65. Saner E. How to pamper a panda Retrieved from. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/05/how-to-pamper-a-panda.
66. Saquete R. The myth of the antiradiation cactus Retrieved from. http://www.computableminds.com/post/cactus/monitor/radiation/antiradiation/ultraviolet.
67. Shah C. Collaborative information seeking: The art and science of making the whole greater than the sum of all 2012, Springer, Berlin.
68. Shao G. Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research 2009, 19(1):7-25. 10.1108/10662240910927795.
69. Sin S.-C.J., Kim K.-S. International students' everyday life information seeking: The informational value of social networking sites. Library & Information Science Research 2013, 35(2):107-116. 10.1016/j.lisr.2012.11.006.
70. Spiranec S., Zorica M.B. Information literacy 2.0: Hype or discourse refinement?. Journal of Documentation 2010, 66(1):140-153. 10.1108/00220411011016407.
71. The University of New Hampshire Kentucky fried chicken hoax Retrieved from. http://www.unh.edu/BoilerPlate/kfc.html.
72. Urquhart C., Yeoman A. Information behaviour of women: Theoretical perspectives on gender. Journal of Documentation 2010, 66(1):113-139.
73. Walsh J. Librarians and controlling disinformation: Is multi-literacy instruction the answer?. Library Review 2010, 59(7):498-511. 10.1108/00242531011065091.
74. Weber E.U., Blais A.-R., Betz N.E. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2002, 15(4):263-290. 10.1002/bdm.414.
75. Weiser E.B. Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2000, 3(2):167-178. 10.1089/109493100316012.
76. Witek D., Grettano T. Information literacy on Facebook: An analysis. Reference Services Review 2012, 40(2):242-257. 10.1108/00907321211228309.
77. Wyllie A., Zhang J.F., Casswell S. Positive responses to televised beer advertisements associated with drinking and problems reported by 18 to 29-year-olds. Addiction 1998, 93:749-760.
78. Yaari E., Baruchson-Arbib S., Bar-Ilan J. Information quality assessment of community generated content: A user study of Wikipedia. Journal of Information Science 2011, 37(5):487-498. 10.1177/0165551511416065.
79. Zhang Y. College students' uses and perceptions of social networking sites for health and wellness information. Information Research 2012, 17(3):523. (Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/17-3/paper523.html).
80. Zhou M. Gender difference in web search perceptions and behavior: Does it vary by task performance?. Computers & Education 2014, 78:174-184.