CSR and Related Terms in SME Owner–Managers’ Mental Models in Six European Countries: National Context Matters

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 433-456

  Fassin, Yves ^a   Werner, Andrea ^b   Van Rossem, Annick ^c   Signori, Silvana ^d   Garriga, Elisabet ^e   von Weltzien Hoivik, Heidi ^f   Schlierer, Hans Jörg ^g  

^a VLERICK BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Belgium)

^b MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

^e EADA BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

^f BI NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Norway)

^g EMLYON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

Author keywords

Business ethics; Cognition; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Cross national study; Repertory Grid Technique; Small to medium sized enterprises

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942250954     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2098-7     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review,21(1), 254–285.
2. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review,32(3), 836–863.
3. Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review,14(3), 147–158.
4. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about Corporate Social Responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management,18(4), 932–968.
5. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in Corporate Social Responsibility: Drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review,17(4), 347–363.
6. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics,74, 391–407.
7. Amable, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Argandoña, A., & von Weltzien Hoivik, H. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility: One size does not fit all: Collecting evidence from Europe. Journal of Business Ethics,89, 221–234.
9. Baden, D., & Harwood, I. A. (2013). Terminology matters: A critical exploration of Corporate Social Responsibility terms. Journal of Business Ethics,166, 615–627.
10. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal,43, 717–736.
11. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,33(11), 1304–1320.
12. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal,33(1), 122–136.
13. Begley, T. M. (1995). Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing,10(3), 249–263.
14. Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987). Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing,2(1), 79–93.
15. Bell, R. (2003). The repertory grid technique. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook in personal construct psychology (pp. 95–103). Chichester: Wiley.
16. Boal, K. B., & Peery, N. (1985). The cognitive structure of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management,11(3), 71.
17. Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for Corporate Social Responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review,16(4), 294–311.
18. Bood, R. P. (1998). Charting organizational learning: A comparison of multiple mapping techniques. In C. Eden & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition: Theory, methods and research (pp. 201–230). London: Sage.
19. Boyacigiller, N., & Adler, N. J. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: The organizational sciences in a global context. Academy of Management Review,13(2), 262–291.
20. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporation behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review,32(3), 946–967.
21. Cantó-Milá, N., & Lozano, J. (2009). The Spanish discourse on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,87, 157–171.
22. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review,9(2), 354–359.
23. Caroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analyses of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way general of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika,35, 283–919.
24. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons,34(4), 39–48.
25. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society,38, 268–295.
26. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews,12(1), 85–105.
27. Chiu, S., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management,37, 1558–1585.
28. Cho, V., & Wright, R. P. (2010). Exploring the evaluation framework of strategic information systems using repertory grid technique: A cognitive perspective from chief information officers. Behaviour & Information Technology,29(5), 447–457.
29. Cossette, P., & Audet, M. (1992). Mapping of an idiosyncratic schema. Journal of Management Studies,29(3), 325–347.
30. Cowley, S. J. (2007). The cognitive dynamics of distributed language. Language Sciences,29, 575–583.
31. Cowley, S. J. (2009). Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & Cognition,17(3), 495–507.
32. Cramer, J., van der Heijden, A., & Jonker, J. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Making sense through thinking and acting. Business Ethics: A European Review,15(4), 380–389.
33. Crilly, D., Schneider, S. C., & Zollo, M. (2008). Psychological antecedents to socially responsible behavior. European Management Review,5(3), 175–190.
34. Crouch, C., & Streeck, W. (1997). Political economy of modern capitalism. Mapping convergence & diversity. London: Sage Publications.
35. Curran, J., & Blackburn, R. (2001). Researching the small enterprise. London: Sage.
36. Daniels, K., & Johnson, G. (2002). On trees and triviality traps: Locating the debate on the contribution of cognitive mapping to organizational research. Organization Studies,23(1), 73–81.
37. Daniels, K., Johnson, G., & de Chernatony, L. (1994). Differences in managerial cognitions of competition. British Journal of Management,5(2), 21–29.
38. Daniels, K., Johnson, G., & de Chernatony, L. (2002). Task and institutional influences on managers’ mental models of competition. Organization Studies,23(1), 31–62.
39. De George, R. T. (1987). The status of business ethics: Past and future. Journal of Business Ethics,6(2), 201–212.
40. Den Hond, F., de Bakker, F., & Neergaard, P. (2007). Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in action: Talking, doing, measuring. Aldershot: Ashgate.
41. Dunn, W. N., & Ginsberg, A. (1986). A socio-cognitive network approach to organizational analysis. Human Relations,39(11), 950–976.
42. Easterby-Smith, M. (1980). The design, analysis and interpretation of repertory grids. Journal of Man-Machine Studies,13, 3–24.
43. Eden, C. (1992). On the nature of cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies,29(3), 261–265.
44. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998a). Analysing and comparing idiographic causal maps. In C. Eden & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition: Theory, methods and research (pp. 192–209). London: Sage.
45. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998b). Analysing and comparing idiographic causal maps. In J. Spender & C. Eden (Eds.), Advances in personal construct psychology: New directions and perspectives (pp. 183–201). London: Sage.
46. Edwards, H. M., McDonald, V., & Young, M. S. (2009). The repertory grid technique: Its place in empirical software engineering research. Information and Software Technology,51, 785–798.
47. Egels, N. (2005). Sorting out the mess, a review of definitions of ethical issues in business. Göteborg: Center for Business in Society, GRI, Göteborg University.
48. Epstein, E. (1987). The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review,29(3), 99–114.
49. European Commission (2014) What is an SME? http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/sme-definition/. Accessed 31 Jan 2014.
50. Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2011). Small business Owner’s Perceptions of CSR & business ethics-related Concepts. Journal of Business Ethics,98(3), 425–453.
51. Fassin, Y., & Van Rossem, A. (2009). Corporate Governance in the CSR and Ethics Debate: Sensemaking of Experts and CEOs about Social Issues in Management. Corporate Governance: An International Review.,17(5), 573–593.
52. Fiol, M., & Huff, S. (1992). Maps for managers: Where we are? Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies,29(3), 267–285.
53. Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique. Chichester: Wiley.
54. Fransella, F., & Neimeyer, R. (2003). George Alexander Kelly: The man and his theory. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook in personal construct psychology (pp. 21–32). Chichester: Wiley.
55. Freeman, E. R., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics,3, 419–443.
56. Gallie, W. B. (1956). Art as an essentially contested concept. The Philosophical Quarterly,6(23), 97–114.
57. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility theories: Mapping the theory. Journal of Business Ethics,53(1/2), 51–71.
58. Ginsberg, A. (1989). Construing the business portfolio: A cognitive model for diversification. Journal of Management Studies,26(4), 417–439.
59. Godos-Díez, J., Fernández-Gago, R., & Martínez-Campillo, A. (2011). How important are CEOs to CSR practices? An analysis of the mediating effect of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,98(4), 531–548.
60. Grice, J. W. (2002). Idiogrid: Software for the management and analysis of repertory grids. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers,34(3), 338–341.
61. Gully, S. M., Phillips, J. M., Castellano, W. G., Han, K., & Kim, A. (2013). A mediated moderation model of recruiting socially and environmentally responsible job applicants. Personnel Psychology,66(4), 935–973.
62. Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schmidpeter, R. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe. Berlin: Springer.
63. Hagans, C. L., Neimeyer, G. J., & Goodholm, J. C. R. (2000). The effect of elicitation methods on personal construct differentiation and valence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology,13(2), 155–173.
64. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International.
65. Hodgkinson, G. P. (1997). Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market: The case of UK residential agents. Journal of Management Studies,34(6), 921–945.
66. Hodgkinson, G. P. (2002). Comparing managers’ mental models of competition: Why self-report measures of belief similarity won’t do. Organization Studies,23(1), 63–72.
67. Hodgkinson, G. P. (2005). Images of the competitive space. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
68. Hodgkinson, G. P., & Wright, G. (2002). Confronting strategic inertia in a top management team: Learning from failure. Organization Studies,23(6), 949–977.
69. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analyses: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Huff, A. S. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. In A. S. Huff (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought (pp. 11–47). Chichester: Wiley.
71. Hunt, J. (2000). Environment, information and networks: How does information reach small and medium-sized enterprises. In R. Hillary (Ed.), Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment (pp. 194–202). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
72. Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2006). Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. British Journal of Industrial Relations,44(3), 569–575.
73. Jamali, D., Zanhour, M., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics,87(3), 355–377.
74. Janckowicz, D. (2003). The easy guide to repertory grids. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
75. Jenkins, H. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. Journal of General Management,29(4), 37–57.
76. Jones, N., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society,16(1), 1–12.
77. Joyner, B., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,41, 297–311.
78. Kelly, G. (1955). Volume one: A theory of Personality. New York: Norton.
79. Lee, M. (2008). A review of the theories of Corporate Social Responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews,10(1), 53–73.
80. Lepoutre, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics,67(3), 257–273.
81. Lim, D. K., Morse, E. A., Mitchell, R. K., & Seawright, K. K. (2010). Institutional environment and entrepreneurial cognitions: A comparative business systems perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice,34(3), 491–516.
82. Longenecker, J., Moore, C., & Petty, W. (1996). Small business management, an entrepreneurial emphasis (Vol. 10). Cincinatti: South-Western College Publication.
83. Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences,26(6), 252–544.
84. Luo, Y. (2006). Global dimensions of corporate governance. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
85. Mackay, N. (1992). Identification, reflection, and correlation: Problems in the bases of repertory grid measures. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology,5(1), 57–75.
86. Maignan, I. (2001). Consumer perceptions of the Corporate Social Responsibility: A crosscultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics,30(1), 57–73.
87. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,27, 455–469.
88. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly,48(2), 268–305.
89. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics,54(4), 323–337.
90. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review,93(2), 404–426.
91. Metzler, A. E., Gorden, H., & Neimeyer, G. J. (2002). The effect of repertory grid scale size and rating direction on structural measures of differentiation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology,15(2), 95–107.
92. Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., & GjØlberg, M. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance,6(4), 369–385.
93. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review,22(4), 853–886.
94. Mitchell, R., Busenitz, L. W., Bird, B., Caglio, C. M., McMullen, J. S., Morse, E. A., et al. (2007). The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice,31(1), 1–25.
95. Mitchell, R., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P., Morse, E., & Brock Smith, J. (2002). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,27(2), 93–104.
96. Money, K., & Schepers, H. (2007). Are CSR and corporate governance converging?: A view from boardroom directors and company secretaries in FTSE100 companies in the UK. Journal of General Management,33(2), 1–11.
97. Morgeson, F. P., Aguinis, H., Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. S. (2013). Extending Corporate Social Responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains: A look to the future. Personnel Psychology,66(4), 805–824.
98. Neimeyer, G. (2002). Towards reflexive scrutiny in repertory grid methodology. Journal of Constructivist Psychology,15(2), 89–95.
99. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies,24, 403–441.
100. Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2013). License to Ill: The effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and CEO moral identity on Corporate Social Irresponsibility. Personnel Psychology,66(4), 861–893.
101. Pater, A., & van Lierop, L. (2006). Sense and sensitivity: The roles of organisation and stakeholders in managing Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review,15(4), 339–351.
102. Pedersen, E. R. (2010). Modeling CSR: How managers understand the responsibilities of business towards society. Journal of Business Ethics,91(2), 155–166.
103. Perrini, F. (2006). SMEs and CSR theory: Evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics,67(2), 305–316.
104. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006a). Strategy & society—The link between competitive advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review,84(12), 78–92.
105. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006b). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review,84(12), 78–92.
106. Reeve, J., Owens, G. R., & Neimeyer, G. J. (2002). Using examples in repertory grids: The influences on construct elicitation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology,15(2), 121–126.
107. Reger, R. K. (1990). The repertory grid technique for eliciting the content and structure of cognitive constructive systems. In A. S. Huff (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought (pp. 301–309). Chichester: Wiley.
108. Reger, R. K., & Palmer, T. B. (1996). Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organization Science,7(1), 22–40.
109. Robertson, D. C., & Nicholson, N. (1996). Expressions of Corporate Social Responsibility in UK firms. Journal of Business Ethics,15(10), 1095–1106.
110. Rose, J. (2007). Corporate directors and social responsibility: Ethics versus shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics,73(3), 319–331.
111. Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Thornton, M. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology,66(4), 895–933.
112. Sacconi, L. (2006). A social contract account for CSR as an extended model of corporate governance (I): Rational bargaining and justification. Journal of Business Ethics,68, 259–281.
113. Sapir, A. (2006). Globalization and the reform of European social models. Journal of Common Market Studies,44(2), 369–390.
114. Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2008). Integrating and unifying competing frameworks. The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business and Society,47(2), 148–186.
115. Secchi, D. (2007). Utilitarian, managerial and relational theories of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews,9(4), 347–373.
116. Secchi, D. (2009). The cognitive side of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,88(3), 565–581.
117. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal,26, 159–180.
118. Signori, S., & Rusconi, G. (2009). Ethical thinking in traditional Italian Economia Aziendale and the Stakeholder Management Theory: The search for possible interactions. Journal of Business Ethics,89(3), 303–318.
119. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K. C., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. Journal of Business Ethics,15(11), 1131–1140.
120. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
121. Spence, L. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review,8(3), 163–174.
122. Spence, L., & Rutherfoord, R. (2001). Social responsibility, profit maximisation and the small firm owner–manager. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,8(2), 126–139.
123. Spurrett, D. (2004). Distributed cognition and integrational linguistics. Language Sciences,26(5), 497–501.
124. Stewart, V., & Stewart, A. (1981). Business applications of repertory grid (paperback ed.). London: McGraw-Hill Education.
125. Stewart, W. H, Jr, Watson, W. E., Carland, J. C., & Carland, J. W. (1999). A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. Journal of Business Venturing,14(2), 189–214.
126. Stubbart, C. I., & Ramaprasad, A. (1990). Comments on empirical articles and recommendations for future research. In A. S. Huff (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought (pp. 251–288). Chichester: Wiley.
127. Sturrock, K., & Rocha, J. (2000). A multidimensional scaling stress evaluation table. Field Methods,12, 49–60.
128. Sutton, J. (2004). Representation, levels, and context in integrational linguistics and distributed cognition. Language Sciences,26(6), 503–524.
129. Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & De Leeuw, J. (1977). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least-squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika,42, 7–67.
130. Tan, F., & Hunter, G. (2002). The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly,26(1), 39–57.
131. Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology,23(3), 1–36.
132. Tolliver, R., & Neimeyer, G. J. (2002). The effects of construct examples on the content and structure of personal construct system. Journal of Constructivist Psychology,15(2), 127–138.
133. Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2003). Managing ethics in business organizations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
134. Van Rossem, A., & van Veen, K. (2011). Managers’ awareness of fashionable management concepts: An empirical study. European Management Journal,29(3), 206–216.
135. Vogel, D. (1991). Business ethics: New perspectives on old problems. California Management Review,33(4), 101–117.
136. Wheeler, D., Colbert, B., & Freeman, E. R. (2003). Focusing on value: Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, sustainability and a stakeholder approach in a network world. Journal of General Management,28(3), 1–23.
137. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms. The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
138. Wijnen, K., Janssens, W., De Pelsmacker, P., & Van Kenhove, P. (2002). Marktonderzoek met SPPS. Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.
139. Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews,12(1), 50–84.
140. Wright, R. P. (2006). Rigor and relevance using repertory grid technique in strategy research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management,3, 289–341.
141. Wurthmann, K. (2013). A social cognitive perspective on the relationships between ethics education, moral attentiveness, and PRESOR. Journal of Business Ethics,114(1), 131–151.
142. Yidong, T., & Xinxin, L. (2013). How ethical leadership influence employees' innovative work behavior: A perpsective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics,116(2), 441–455.
143. Zollo, M., Minoja, M., Casanova, L., Hockerts, K., Neergaard, P., Schneider, S., et al. (2009). Towards an internal change management perspective of CSR: EVIDENCE from project RESPONSE on the sources of cognitive alignment between managers and their stakeholders, and their implications for social performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review,9(4), 355–372.