Extending corporate social responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains: A look to the future

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 805-824

  Morgeson, Frederick P ^a   Aguinis, Herman ^b   Waldman, David A ^c   Siegel, Donald S ^d  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886247015     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: 17446570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/peps.12055     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aguinis H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In Zedeck S (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855-879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Aguinis H, Glavas A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932-968.
3. Aguinis H, Glavas A. (2013). What corporate environmental sustainability can do for industrial-organizational psychology. In Huffman AH, Klein SR (Eds.), Green organizations: Driving change with I-O psychology (pp. 379-392). New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Aguinis H, Glavas A. (in press). Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice.
5. Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Culpepper SA. (in press). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management.
6. Anderson N, Costa AC, Salgado JF. (2012). Sustainability and industrial, work, and organizational psychology: Globalization, contribution, and psychological sustainability. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 487-490.
7. Balthazard P, Waldman DA, Thatcher RW, Hannah ST. (2012). Differentiating transformational and non-transformational leaders on the basis of neurological imaging. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 244-258.
8. Brammer SJ, Pavelin S. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. In Wright M, Siegel DS, Keasey K, Filatotchev I (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate governance (pp. 719-743). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Caligiuri P, Mencin A, Jiang K. (2013). Win-win-win: The influence of company-sponsored volunteerism programs on employees, NGOs, and business units. Personnel Psychology, 66, 825-860.
10. Cascio WF, Aguinis H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1062-1081.
11. Chatterji AK, Levine D. (2006). Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review, 48(2), 29-51.
12. Chatterji AK, Levine D, Toffel MW. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18, 125-169.
13. Chuang C, Liao H. (2010). Strategic human resource management in service context: Taking care of business by taking care of employees and customers. Personnel Psychology, 63, 153-196.
14. Devinney TM. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 44-56.
15. Devinney TM. (2013). Is microfoundational thinking critical to management thought and practice? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 81-84.
16. Doh JP, Stumpf SA. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
17. Donaldson T, Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
18. Edmans A. (2012). The link between job satisfaction and firm value, with implications for of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 1-19.
19. Foss NJ. (2011). Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like. Journal of Management, 37, 1413-1428.
20. Gully SM, Phillips JM, Castellano WG, Han K, Kim A. (2013). A mediated moderation model of recruiting socially and environmentally responsible job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 66, 935-973.
21. Hannon J, Milkovich G. (1996). The effect of human resource reputation signals on share price: An event study. Human Resource Management, 35, 405-424.
22. Hart SL. (1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986-1014.
23. Husted B, Salazar J de J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profit and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75-91.
24. Jensen MC. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7, 297-317.
25. Jones TM, Felps W, Bigley GA. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32, 137-155.
26. Lee M. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Review, 10, 53-73.
27. Maignan I, Ferrell OC. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 283-297.
28. Margolis JD, Walsh JP. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.
29. Marler J. (2012). Strategic human resource management in context: A historical and global perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 6-11.
30. Mathieu JE, Aguinis H, Culpepper SA, Chen G. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 951-966.
31. McWilliams A, Siegel D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603-609.
32. McWilliams A, Siegel D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127.
33. Mollick E. (2012). People and process, suits, and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1001-1015.
34. Morgeson FP, Dierdorff EC, Hmurovic JL. (2010). Work design in situ: Understanding the role of occupational and organizational context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 351-360.
35. Nishii LH, Lepak DP, Schneider B. (2008). Employee attribution of the "why" of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61, 503-545.
36. Ones DS, Dilchert S. (2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 444-466.
37. Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403-411.
38. Ormiston ME, Wong EM. (2013). License to ill: The effects of corporate social responsibility and CEO moral identity on corporate social irresponsibility. Personnel Psychology, 66, 861-893.
39. Pless NM, Maak T, Waldman DA. (2012). Different approaches toward doing the right thing: Mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 51-65.
40. Rich BL, Lepine JA, Crawford ER. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617-635.
41. Rupp DE. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 72-94.
42. Rupp DE, Shao R, Thornton MA, Skarlicki DP. (2013). Applicants' and employees' reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology, 66, 895-933.
43. Scott RW. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Senior C, Lee N, Butler M. (2011). Organizational cognitive neuroscience. Organization Science, 22, 804-815.
45. Sharfman M. (1996). The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg and Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 287-296.
46. Siegel DS. (2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 5-16.
47. Siegel DS, Vitaliano D. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 773-792.
48. Waddock S, Graves S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.
49. Waldman DA, Balthazard PA, Peterson S. (2011). The neuroscience of leadership: Can we revolutionize the way that leaders are identified and developed? Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 60-74.
50. Waldman DA, Siegel D. (2008). Defining the socially responsible leader. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 117-131.
51. Waldman DA, Siegel D, Javidan M. (2006). Components of transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1703-1725.
52. Waldman DA, Wang D, Stikic M, Berka C, Balthazard PA, Richardson T, Pless NM, Maak T. (2013). Emergent leadership and team engagement: An application of neuroscience technology and methods. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings.
53. Walls JL, Phan PH, Berrone P. (2011). Measuring environmental strategy: Construct development, reliability and validity. Business & Society, 50, 71-115.