Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 226-238

  Baynes, Jack ^a   Herbohn, John ^a   Smith, Carl ^b   Fisher, Robert ^a,c   Bray, David ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Causal diagram; Collective action; Community forestry; Intra community governance; Social capital

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSION; COLLECTIVE ACTION; COMMUNITY FORESTRY; DEVELOPING WORLD; LITERATURE REVIEW; POVERTY; REFORESTATION; RURAL ECONOMY; SOCIAL CAPITAL;

AFRICA; LATIN AMERICA; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NEPAL; PHILIPPINES;

EID: 84942238116     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Agrawal A. Forests, governance, and sustainability: common property theory and its contributions. Int. J. Commons 2007, 1:111-136.
2. Agarwal B. Participatory exclusions, community forestry and gender: an analysis for south Asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev. 2001, 29:1623-1648.
3. Agarwal B. Rule-making in community forestry institutions: the difference women make. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2296-2308.
4. Agarwal B. Gender and forest conservation: the impact of women's participation in community forest governance. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2785-2799.
5. Agarwal B. Does women's proportional strength affect their participation? Governing local forests in south Asia. World Dev. 2010, 38:98-112.
6. Alemagi D., Hajjar R., David S., Kozak R.A. Benefits and barriers to certification of community-based forest operations in Cameroon: an exploratory assessment. Small-scale For. 2012, 11(4):417-433.
7. Alzula N., Alzula B., Villareal R. Key barriers to CBFM. Linking People to Policy: From Participation to Deliberation in the Context of Philippine Community Forestry 2005, 33-37. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Philippines. P. O'Hara (Ed.).
8. Anderson T., Lee G. Understanding Melanesian customary land. In Defence of Melanesian Customary Law 2010, 2-4. Aidwatch, Erskineville, NSW, Australia. L. Anderson, G. Lee (Eds.).
9. Antinori A., Rausser G. Collective choice and community forestry management in Mexico: an empirical analysis. J. Dev. Stud. 2007, 43:512-536.
10. Antinori C., Rausser G.C. Ownership and control in Mexico's community forestry sector. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 2008, 57:101-136.
11. Arifin B., Swallow B.M., Suyanto S., Coe R.D. A conjoint analysis of farmer preferences for community forestry contracts in Sumber Jaya Watershed, Indonesia. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2040-2050.
12. Arnold J.E.M. Community forestry. Ambio 1987, 16:122-128.
13. Asbjornsen H., Ashton M.S. Community forestry in Oaxaca, Mexico. J. Sustain. For. 2002, 15(1):1-16.
14. Baral N., Stern M.J., Hinen J.T. Integrated conservation and development project life cycles in the Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: is development overpowering conservation?. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16:2903-2917.
15. Barsimantov J.A. Vicious and virtuous cycles and the role of external non-government actors in community forestry in Oaxaca and Michoachan, Mexico. Hum. Ecol. 2010, 38:49-63.
16. Barsimantov J., Racelis A., Biedenweg K., DiGiano M. When collective action and tenure allocations collide: outcomes from community forests in Quintana Roo, Mexico and Peten, Guatemala. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:343-352.
17. Barsimantov J.A., Antezana J.N. Forest cover change and land tenure change in Mexico's avocado region: is community forestry related to reduced deforestation for high-value crops?. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 32:844-853.
18. Beauchamp E., Ingram V. Impacts of community forests on livelihoods in Cameroon: lessons from two case studies. Int. For. Rev. 2011, 13:389-403.
19. Bixler R.P. From community forest management to polycentric governance: assessing evidence from the bottom up. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2014, 27:155-169.
20. Bizikova L., Nijnik M.K., Kluvankova-Oravska T. Sustaining multifunctional forestry through the developing of social capital and promoting participation: a case of multiethnic mountain communities. Small-scale For. 2012, 11:301-319.
21. Borges-Méndez R. Sustainable development and participatory practices in community forestry: the case of FUNDECOR in Costa Rica. Local Environ. 2008, 13:367-383.
22. Boyer-Rechlin B. Women in forestry: a study of Kenya's green belt movement and Nepal's community forestry program. Scand. J. For. Res. 2010, 25:69-72.
23. Bray D.B., Antinori C., Torres-Rojo J.M. The Mexican model of community forestry management: the role of agrarian policy, forest policy and entrepreneurial organisation. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8:470-484.
24. Calderon M.M., Nawir A.A. An evaluation of the feasibility and benefits of forest partnerships to develop tree plantations: case studies in the Philippines. CIFOR Working Paper No. 27 2006, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
25. Casse T., Milhøj A. Community forestry and forest conservation: friends or strangers?. Environ. Policy Gov. 2011, 21:83-98.
26. Chakraborty R.N. Stability and outcomes of common property institutions in forestry: evidence from the Terai region of Nepal. Ecol. Econ. 2001, 36:341-353.
27. Charnley S., Poe M.R. Community forestry in theory and practice: where are we now?. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2007, 36:301-336.
28. Chhetri B.B.K., Lund J.F., Nielsen Ø.J. The public finance potential of community forestry in Nepal. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 73:113-121.
29. Chhetri B.B.K., Johnsen F.H., Konoshima M., Yoshimoto A. Community forestry in the hills of Nepal: determinants of user participation in forest management. For. Policy Econ. 2013, 30:6-13.
30. Chokkalingam U., Pulhin J.M., Carandang A.P., Lasco R.D. Conclusions and recommendations. One Century of Forest Rehabilitation in the Philippines: Approaches, Outcomes and Lessons 2006, 122-132. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. U. Chokkalingam, A.P. Carandang, J.M. Pulhin, R.D. Lasco, R.J.J. Peras, T. Toma (Eds.).
31. Coleman E.A. Common property rights, adaptive capacity, and response to forest disturbance. Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21:855-865.
32. Coulibaly-Lingani P., Savadogo P., Tigabu M., Oden P. Factors influencing people's participation in the forest management program in Burkina Faso, West Africa. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 13:292-302.
33. Cramb R.A. The role of social capital in the case of promotion on conservation farming: the role of 'Landcare' in the Philippines. Land Degrad. Dev. 2006, 17:23-30.
34. Cronkleton P., Pulhin J.M., Saigal S. Co-management in community forestry: how the partial devolution of management rights creates challenges for forest communities. Conserv. Soc. 2012, 10:92-102.
35. De Jong W., Ruiz S., Becker M. Conflicts and communal management in northern Bolivia. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8:447-457.
36. Dongol C.H., Hughey K.F.D., Bigsby H.R. Capital formation and sustainable community forestry in Nepal. Mt. Res. Dev. 2002, 22:70-77.
37. Egbe S.E. The concept of community forestry under Cameroonian law. J. Afr. Law 2001, 45:25-50.
38. Ellis E.A., Porter-Bolland L. Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighbouring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256:1971-1983.
39. Engel S., Palmer C. Who owns the right? The determinants of community benefits from logging in Indonesia. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8:434-446.
40. Estoria E., Herbohn J., Harrison S. The performance of community organisers in promotion of community forestry in Leyte Province, Philippines. Small-scale For. Econ. Manag. Policy 2004, 3:363-384.
41. FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment. FAO Forestry Paper No. 163, Rome, Italy.
42. FAO, 2011. Reforming Forest Tenure: Issues, Principles and Process. FAO Forestry Paper 165, Rome, Italy.
43. Fine B. Social capital. Dev. Pract. 2007, 17:566-574.
44. Fisher R.J. Innovations, persistence and change: reflections on the state of community forestry. Community Forestry: Current Innovations and Experiences 2003, 16-29. Regional Community Forestry Training Center and Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Bangkok.
45. Fisher R., Prabhu R., McDougall C. Introduction: people, forests and the needs for adaptation. Adaptive Collaborative Management of Community Forests in Asia: Experiences from Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines 2007, 1-15. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia, (Chapter 1). R. Fisher, R. Prabhu, C. McDougall (Eds.).
46. Fisher R.J. Lessons learned from community forestry in Asia and their relevance for REDD+. USAID-supported Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities (FCMC) Program 2014.
47. Fortmann L. The tree tenure factor in agroforestry with particular reference to Africa. Agrofor. Syst. 1985, 2:229-251.
48. Gilmour G. Retrospective and prospective view of community forestry in Nepal. J. For. Livelihood 2003, 2:5-7.
49. Giri K., Darnhofer I. Outmigrating men: a window of opportunity for women's participation in community forestry?. Scand. J. For. Res. 2010, 25:55-61.
50. Gregorio N., Herbohn J., Harrison S. Small-scale forestry development in Leyte, Philippines: the central role of nurseries. Small-scale For. Econ. Manag. Policy 2004, 3:337-351.
51. Gurung A., Bista R., Karki R., Shrestha S., Uprety D., Oh S.E. Community-based forest management and its role in improving forest conditions in Nepal. Small-scale For. 2013, 12(3):377-388.
52. Hajjar R., McGrath D.G., Kozak R.A., Innes J.L. Framing community forestry challenges with a broader lens: case studies from the Brazilian Amazon. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92:2159-2169.
53. Harrison S., Emtage N.F., Nasayao E.E. Past and present forestry support programs in the Philippines and lessons for the future. Small-scale For. Econ. Manag. Policy 2004, 3:303-317.
54. Hayes T., Persha L. Nesting local forestry initiatives: revisiting community forest management in a REDD+ world. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12:545-553.
55. Hébert M., Rosen M.G. Community forestry and the paradoxes of citizenship in Mexico: the cases of Oaxaca and Guerrero. Can. J. Lat. Am. Caribb. Stud. 2007, 32:9-44.
56. Hodgdon B.D. Community forestry in Laos. J. Sustain. For. 2010, 29:50-78.
57. Hodgdon B.D., Chapela F., Bray D.B. Mexican community forestry: enterprises and associations as a response to barriers. Rainfor. Alliance 2013, http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/sites/default/files/publication/pdf/Hodgdon-Chapela-Bray-WEB.pdf (accessed 07.08.14).
58. Humphries S., Holmes T.P., Kainer K., Gonçalves Koury C.G., Cruz E., de Miranda Rocha R. Are community-based forest enterprises in the tropics financially viable? Case studies from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 77:62-73.
59. Johnson T. Community-based forest management in the Philippines. J. For. 1999, 97:26.
60. Jugan A.V. CBFM insights and recommendations from a forester in the field. Linking People to Policy: From Participation to Deliberation in the Context of Philippine Community Forestry 2005, 55-59. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Philippines. P. O'Hara (Ed.).
61. Khadka C., Vacik H. Comparing a top-down and bottom-up approach to the identification of criteria and indicators for sustainable community forest management in Nepal. Forestry 2012, 85(1):145-158.
62. Kobbail A.A.R. Local people attitudes towards community forestry practices: a case study of Kosti Province-Central Sudan. Int. J. For. Res. 2012, 12:1-7.
63. Lamb J.N., Moore M.K., Smith R. Pursuing community forestry in Liberia. Environ. Policy Gov. 2009, 19:296-308.
64. Larson A.M. Democratic Decentralisation in the Forestry Sector: Lessons Learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America 2004, Centre for International Forestry Research, Managua, Nicaragua.
65. Larson A.M., Barry D., Dahal G.R., Colfer C.J.P. Tenure change in the global south. Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform 2010, 3-18. Earthscan, London. A.M. Larson, D. Barry, G.R. Dahal, C.J.P. Colfer (Eds.).
66. Larson A.M., Dahal G.R. Forest tenure reform: new resource rights for forest-based communities?. Conserv. Soc. 2012, 10(2):77-90.
67. Lasco R.D. The restoration value chain for the Philippine. The Future of the Sierra Madre: Responding to Social and Ecological Changes. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Environment and Development, CVPRD 2005, 27-31. Golden Press, Tuguegarao. J. van der Ploeg, A.B. Masipiqueña (Eds.).
68. Lasco R.D., Carandang A.P., Chokkalingam U., Pulhin J.M., Razal A.A., Acosta R.T., Natividad M.Q., Peras R.J.J. Bottlenecks and recommended actions. One Century of Forest Rehabilitation in the Philippines: Approaches, Outcomes and Lessons 2006, 107-121. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. U. Chokkalingam, A.P. Carandang, J.M. Pulhin, R.D. Lasco, R.J.J. Peras, T. Toma (Eds.).
69. Laurel F., Mayape R., Parafina R. Ban the log ban. Linking People to Policy: From Participation to Deliberation in the Context of Philippine Community Forestry 2005, 21-26. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Philippines. P. O'Hara (Ed.).
70. Lawrence A., Krishna P., Barnes R., Malla Y. Adaptive value of participatory biodiversity monitoring in community. For. Environ. Conserv. 2007, 33:325-334.
71. Le H.D., Smith C., Herbohn J.L., Harrison S.R. More than just trees: assessing reforestation success in tropical developing countries. J. Rural Stud. 2012, 28:5-19.
72. Le H.D., Smith C., Herbohn J.L. What drives the success of reforestation projects in tropical developing countries? The case of the Philippines. Glob. Environ. Change 2014, 24:334-348.
73. Ledesma E., Bares E., Dizon I. What happens when there is a logging ban in CBFM? The case of BREDCI, Bicol. Linking People to Policy: From Participation to Deliberation in the Context of Philippine Community Forestry 2005, 21-26. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Philippines. P. O'Hara (Ed.).
74. Legewie N. An introduction to applied data analysis with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Forum Qual. Sozial./Forum Soc. Res. 2013, 14(3):1-9. Available from: http://nbn.resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1303154.
75. Lund F.J., Baral K., Bhandari N.S., Chhetri K.B., Larsen H.O., Nielsen Ø.J., Puri L., Rutt R.L., Treue T. Who benefits from taxation of forest products in Nepal's community forests?. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 38:119-125.
76. Lingani P.C., Svadogo P., Tigabu M., Oden P.C. Factors influencing people's participation in the forest management program in Burkina Faso, West Africa. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 13:292-302.
77. McDougall M., Ojha H., Pandey R.K., Banjade M.R., Pandit B.H. Enhancing adaptiveness and collaboration in community forestry in Nepal: reflections from participatory action research. Adaptive Collaborative Management of Community Forests in Asia: Experiences from Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines 2007, 52-92. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. R. Fisher, R. Prabhu, C. McDougall (Eds.).
78. Macqueen D. Enabling conditions for successful community forest enterprises. Small-scale For. 2013, 12:145-163.
79. Malla Y.B. Impact of community forestry on rural livelihoods and food security. Unasylva 2000, 202(52):37-45.
80. Malla Y.B., Neupane H.R., Branney P.J. Why aren't poor people benefitting more from community forestry?. J. For. Livelihood 2003, 31:78-93.
81. Mangabat C.B., Snelder D.N., de Groot W.T. Tree adoption in the north-east Philippine uplands: analysis of a GO-NGO partnership. Small-scale For. 2009, 8:463-478.
82. Maryudi A., Devkota R.R., Schusser C., Yufanyi C., Salla M., Aurenhammer H., Rotchanaphatharawit R., Krott M. Back to basics: considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 14(1):1-5.
83. Matose F. Co-management options for reserved forests in Zimbabawe and beyond: policy implications of forest management strategies. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8:363-374.
84. Méndez-López M., García-Frapolli E., Pritchard D.J., Sánchez González M.C., Ruiz-Mallén I., Porter Bolland L., Reyes-García V. Local participation in biodiversity conservation initiatives: a comparative analysis of different models in South East Mexico. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 145:321-329.
85. Merino-Perez L. Conservation and forest communities in Mexico: experiences, visions and rights. Community Action for Conservation: Mexican Experiences 2013, 25-44. Springer. L. Porter-Bolland, I. Ruiz-Mallén, C. Camacho-Benavides, S. McCandless (Eds.).
86. Merriam-Webster, 2015. Dictionary Definition of Extra-legal, (accessed 16.08.15). http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/extra-legal.
87. Mitchell R.E. Planting trees: building democracy: sustainable community forestry in Mexico. Environmental Issues in Latin America and the Caribbean 2005, 95-118. Springer.
88. Moeliono M., Wollenberg E., Limber G. Between state and society: decentralization in Indonesia. The Decentralization of Forest Governance: Politics, Economics and the Fight for Control of Forests in Indonesian Borneo 2010, 3-7. Earthscan, London. E. Moeliono (Ed.).
89. Mukul S.A., Manzoor Rashid A.Z.M., Quazi S.A., Uddin M.B., Fox J. Local peoples' responses to co-management regime in protected areas: a case study from Satchari National Park, Bangladesh. For. Trees Livelihoods 2012, 10.1080/14728028.2012.669132.
90. Murti R., Boydell S. Land conflict and community forestry in Fiji. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2008, 19(1):6-19.
91. Nagendra H. Tenure and forest conditions: community forestry in the Nepal Terai. Environ. Conserv. 2002, 29:530-539.
92. Niesenbaum R.A., Salazar M.E., Diop A.M. Community forestry in the Mayan Biosphere Reserve in Guatemala. J. Sustain. For. 2005, 19(4):11-18.
93. Ojha H.R. Techno-bureaucratic doxa and challenges for deliberative governance-the case of community forestry policy and practice in Nepal. Policy Soc. 2006, 25:131-175.
94. Ojha H.R., Cameron J., Kumar C. Deliberation or symbolic violence? The governance of community forestry in Nepal. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11:365-374.
95. Ostrom E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 2010, 20:550-557.
96. Padgee A., Kim Y.S., Daughtery P.J. What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2006, 19:33-52.
97. Pandit B.H., Albano A., Kumar C. Community-based forest enterprises in Nepal: an analysis of their role in increasing income benefits to the poor. Small-scale For. 2009, 8:447-462.
98. Pandit R., Bevilacqua E. Forest users and environmental impacts of community forestry in the hills of Nepal. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 13:345-352.
99. Pawar M. Social capital?. Soc. Sci. J. 2006, 43:211-226.
100. Perdicoúlis A., Glasson J. Causal networks in EIA. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2006, 26:553-569.
101. Persha L., Andersson K. Elite capture risk and mitigation in decentralized forest governance regimes. Glob. Environ. Change 2014, 24:265-276.
102. Pokharel R.K. Factors influencing the management regime of Nepal's community forestry. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 17:13-17.
103. Porter-Bolland L., Ellis E.A., Guariguata M.R., Ruiz-Mallén I., Negrete-Yankelevich S., Reyes-García V. Community managed forests and forest protected areas: an assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 268:6-17.
104. Pulhin J.M., Inoue M., Enters T. Three decades of community-based forest management in the Philippines: emerging lessons for sustainable and equitable forest management. Int. For. Rev. 2007, 9(4):865-883.
105. Pulhin J.M., Larson A.M., Pacheco P. Regulations as barriers to community benefits in tenure reform. Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform 2010, 139-159. Earthscan, London and Washington, D.C. A.M. Larson, D. Barry, G.R. Dahal, C.J.P. Colfer (Eds.).
106. Rice D. Why should we protect the forests? The Ikalahan experience. Linking People to Policy: From Participation to Deliberation in the Context of Philippine Community Forestry 2005, 43-49. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Philippines. P. O'Hara (Ed.).
107. Roy A.K.D., Alam K. Participatory forest management for the sustainable management of the Sundarbans mangrove forest. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 8:549-555.
108. Ruiz-Mallén I., Newing H., Porter-Bolland L., Pritchard D.J., García-Frapolli E., Méndez-López M.E., Sánchez-González M.C., de la Peña A., Reyes-Garcia V. Cognisance, participation and protected areas in the Yucatan Peninsula. Environ. Conserv. 2014, 41(3):265-275. 10.1017/s0376892913000507.
109. Salam A.M., Noguchi T. Evaluating capacity management for participatory management in Bangladesh's sal forests on '4Rs' stakeholder analysis. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8:785-796.
110. Schlager E., Ostrom E. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ. 1992, 68:249-262.
111. Schaffernicht M. Causal loop diagrams between structure and behaviour: a critical analysis of the relationship between polarity, behaviour and events. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2010, 27:653-666. 10.1002/sres.1018.
112. Schroeder R.A. Community forestry and conditionality in the Gambia. Afr.: J. Int. Afr. Inst. 1999, 69:1-22.
113. Schuren S.H.G. Trees, rural livelihoods and farmers' decisions: understanding the integration of trees in farmers' fields in northeast Luzon, Philippines. The Future of the Sierra Madre: Responding to Social and Ecological Changes. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Environment and Development, CVPRD 2005, 11-34. Golden Press, Tuguegarao. J. van der Ploeg, A.B. Masipiqueña (Eds.).
114. Schusser C. Who determines biodiversity? An analysis of actors' power and interests in community forestry in Namibia. For. Policy Econ. 2013, 36:42-51.
115. Sharpe B. 'First the forest': conservation, 'community' and 'participation' in south-west Cameroon. Africa 1998, 68:25-45.
116. Sheil D., Puri R., Wan M., Basuki I., van Heist M., Liswants M., Rukmiyati, Rachmikata I., Samsoedin I. Recognising local people's priorities for tropical forest biodiversity. Ambio 2006, 35:17-24.
117. Shrestha K.K., McManus P. The embeddedness of collective action in Nepalese community forestry. Small-scale For. 2007, 6:273-290.
118. Sikor T. Analyzing community-based forestry: local, political and agrarian perspectives. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8:339-349.
119. Sinha H., Suar D. Leadership and people's participation in community forestry. Int. J. Rural Manag. 2005, 1:125-143.
120. Smart A. Social capital. Anthropologica 2008, 50:409-416.
121. Smith P.D., Bur Bahadur K.C., Bimal R. Meeting the needs of Nepal's poor: creating local criteria and indicators of community forestry. J. For. 2003, 101:24-30.
122. Snelder D.J., Schuren S.H.G., Lasco R.D. Major observations and some conclusions. The Future of the Sierra Madre: Responding to Social and Ecological Changes. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Environment and Development, CVPRD 2005, 238-240. Golden Press, Tuguegarao. P. van der Ploeg, A.B. Masipiqueña (Eds.).
123. Sood K.K., Gupta H.K. Implication of Indian foresters' perspectives of joint forest management. Small-scale For. 2007, 6:291-308.
124. Sood K.K., Mitchell C.P. Identifying important biophysical and social determinants of on-farm growing in subsistence-based traditional agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 2009, 75:175-187.
125. Sunam R.K., McCarthy J.F. Advancing equity in community forestry: recognition of the poor matters. Int. For. Rev. 2010, 12:370-382.
126. Sunderlin W.D. Poverty alleviation through community forestry in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam: an assessment of the potential. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8:386-396.
127. Taylor P. Producing more with less: community forestry in Durango, Mexico in an era of trade liberalisation. Rural Sociol. 2000, 65:253-274.
128. Tenenbaum D. The Mexican miracle: community forestry. Bus. Soc. 1996, 96:47-48.
129. Thanh T.N., Sikor T. From legal acts to actual powers: devolution and property rights in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8:397-408.
130. Van Laerhoven F. Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas-a large-N perspective. Glob. Environ. Change 2010, 20:539-546.
131. VIBANARA The truth about timber harvesting in community-based forest management (CBFM). Linking People to Policy: From Participation to Deliberation in the Context of Philippine Community Forestry 2005, 16-20. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Philippines. P. O'Hara (Ed.).
132. Valdez G.V.V., Hansen E.N., Bliss J. Factors impacting marketplace success of community forest enterprises: the case of TIP Muebles, Oaxaca, México. Small-scale For. 2012, 11:339-363.
133. White A., Martin A. Who Owns the World's Forests: Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition 2002, Forest Trends, Washington, D.C, http://www.rightsandresources.org/documents/files/doc_98.pdf (accessed 12.02.12).