Collective choice and community forestry management in Mexico: An empirical analysis

Journal of Development Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 512-536

  Antinori, Camille ^a   Rausser, Gordon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCE; COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; NATURAL RESOURCE;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 33947586430     PISSN: 00220388     EISSN: 17439140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220380701204471     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D. (1999) Rethinking the causes of deforestation: Lessons from economic models. World Bank Research Observer, 14:1, pp. 73-98.
2. Antinori, C. (2000) Vertical integration in Mexican common property forests. University of California, Berkeley
3. Antinori, C., Magana, O., Rojo, J. Torres, Bray, D. and Segura, G. (2004) New evidence of Mexican community forestry. Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of Common Property Oaxaca, Mexico
4. Atkinson, G. (1995) Efficiency vs. Equity: A false dichotomy. Institutional Economics and the Theory of Social Value: Essays in Honor of Mark R. Tool, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York
5. Bardhan, P. (2000) Irrigation and cooperation: An empirical analysis of 48 irrigation communities in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48:4, pp. 847-866.
6. Blackman, A., Albers, H., Avalos, B. and Crooks, L. (2002) The determinants of land use in a managed forest ecosystem: Mexican shade coffee.
7. Bray, D., Ellis, E., Armijo-Canto, N. and Beck, C. T. (2004) The institutional drivers of sustainable landscapes: A case study of the 'Mayan zone' in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Land Use Policy, 21:4, pp. 333-346.
8. Brett, E. A. (2003) Participation and accountability in development management. Journal of Development Studies, 40:2, pp. 1-29.
9. Chatterjee, S. and Price, B. (1991) Regression Analysis by Example, John Wiley and Sons, New York
10. de Janvry, A., Dutilly, C., Muñoz-Pintild;a, C. and Sadoulet, E. (2001) Liberal reforms and community responses in Mexico. Communities and Markets in Economic Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Deaton, A. S. (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconomic Approach to Development Policy, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
12. Deininger, K. and Minten, B. (2002) Determinants of deforestation and the economics of protection: An application to Mexico. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84:4, pp. 943-960.
13. EDUCA (2001) La eleccion en municipios de usos y costumbres, Technical report, Servicios para una Educacion Alternativa (Educa A.C.) and Comision Diocesana de Pastoral Social de Oaxaca. Oaxaca
14. Fox, J. (1992) Democratic rural development: Leadership accountability in regional peasant organizations. Development and Change, 23:2, pp. 1-36.
15. Fox, J. (1996) How does civil society thicken? The political construction of social capital in rural Mexico. World Development, 24:6, pp. 1089-1103.
16. Fujiie, M., Hayami, Y. and Kikuchi, M. (2002) The conditions of collective action for local commons management: The case of irrigation in the Philippines. Foundation for Advancement on International Development (FASID), Tokyo
17. Geist, H. J. and Lambin, E. (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience, 52:2, pp. 143-150.
18. Goldring, L. (1998) Having your cake and eating it too: Selective appropriation of ejido reform in Michoacan. The Transformation of Rural Mexico, Center for US-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diedo, CA
19. Jodha, N. (1992) Common property resources: A missing dimension of development strategies., World Bank, Washington, DC
20. Klooster, D. (2000) Institutional choice, community, and struggle: A case study of forest co-management in Mexico. World Development, 28:1, pp. 1-20.
21. Klooster, D. (2002) Towards adaptive community forest management. Economic Geography, 78:1, pp. 43-70.
22. Knox, A. and Meinzin-Dick, R. (2001) Collective action, property rights and devolution of natural resource management: Exchange of knowledge and implications for policy. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
23. Kopelman, S., Weber, J. and Messick, D. (2002) Factors influencing cooperation in commons dilemmas: A review of experimental psychological research. The Drama of the Commons, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
24. Lam, W. F. (1998) Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure, and Collective Action, Institute for Contemporary Studies, Oakland, CA
25. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. and Bibby, J. (1979) Multivariate Analysis, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, London
26. Merino, L. and Alatorre, G. (1997) El Manejo Forestal Comunitario En Mexico y sus Perspectivas de Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias; Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, Centro de Educacion y Capacitacion para el Desarrollo Sustentable; Consejo Mexicano para la Silvicu, Cuernavaca, Morelos
27. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. and Walker, J. (1994) Rules, Games and Common-Pool Resources, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
29. Platteau, J. and Abraham, A. (2003) Participatory development in the presence of endogenous community imperfections. Journal of Development Studies, 39:2, pp. 104-136.
30. Rendon, I. (1998) La otra elección Oaxaqueña. La Reforma, p. A1.
31. Ribot, J. (1995) From exclusion to participation: Turning Senegal's forest policy around?. World Development, 23:9, pp. 1587-1599.
32. Ribot, J. (1999) Decentralization, participation, and accountability in Sahelian forestry. Africa, 69:1, pp. 23-65.
33. Rodrik, D. (2000) Participatory politics, social cooperation, and economic stability. American Economic Review, 90:2, pp. 140-144.
34. Segura, J. (1988) Los indigenas y los programas de desarrollo agrario 1940-1964. Historia de la Cuestion Agraria Mexicana: Estado de Oaxaca, Centro de Estudios Historicos del Agrarismo en Mexico, Mexico City
35. SEMARNAP (1999) Estadísticas del sector forestal.
36. Snook, L. (1997) Uso, manejo y conservacion forestal en Mexico. Semillas para el Cambio en el Campo: Medio Ambiente, Mercados y Organización Campesina, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City
37. Sundar, N. (2001) Is devolution democratization?. World Development, 29:12, pp. 2007-2023.
38. Tang, S. Y. (1994) Institutions and performance in irrigation systems. Rules, Games and Common-Pool Resources, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
39. Varughese, G. and Ostrom, E. (2001) The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action: Some evidence from community forestry in Nepal. World Development, 29:5, pp. 747-765.
40. Zusman, P. (1988) Individual Behavior and Social Choice in a Cooperative Settlement: The Theory and Practice of the Israeli Moshav, Magnes Press, Hebrew University, Jerusalem
41. Zusman, P. (1992) Constitutional selection of collective choice rules in a cooperative enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17, pp. 353-362.
42. Zusman, P. and Rausser, G. C. (1994) Intraorganizational influence relations and the optimality of collective action. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24:1, pp. 1-17.