Hybrid-Lambda: Simulation of multiple merger and Kingman gene genealogies in species networks and species trees

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Zhu, Sha ^a   Degnan, James H ^b   Goldstien, Sharyn J ^c   Eldon, Bjarki ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^d TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coalescent; FST< inf>; Gene tree; Hybrid lambda; Hybridization; Infinite sites model; Multiple merger; Skewed offspring distribution

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; GENES; HISTORY; MERGING; POPULATION STATISTICS;

COALESCENT; GENE TREE; HYBRID-LAMBDA; HYBRIDIZATION; MULTIPLE MERGER; SKEWED OFFSPRING DISTRIBUTION;

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

COMPUTER PROGRAMS; GENES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENEALOGY; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HUMAN; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GENETICS; SOFTWARE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

GENE FREQUENCY; GENEALOGY AND HERALDRY; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84941631015     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0721-y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Árnason E. Mitochondrial cytochrome b variation in the high-fecundity Atlantic cod: trans-Atlantic clines and shallow gene genealogy. Genetics. 2004; 166:1871-85.
2. Árnason E, Halldórsdóttir K.Nucleotide variation and balancing selection at the Ckma gene in Atlantic cod: analysis with multiple merger coalescent models. PeerJ. 2015; e786:3. doi: 10.7717/peerj.786 .
3. Bartoszek K, Jones G, Oxelman B, Sagitov S. Time to a single hybridization event in a group of species with unknown ancestral history. J Theor Biol. 2004; 322:1-6.
4. Beckenbach AT. In: (Golding B, editor.)Mitochondrial haplotype frequencies in oysters: neutral alternatives to selection models, Non-neutral Evolution. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1994, pp. 188-98.
5. Cardona G, Rossell F, Valiente G. Extended Newick: it is time for a standard representation of phylogenetic networks. BMC Bioinform. 2008; 9:532.
6. Degnan JH, Salter LA. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution. 2005; 59:24-37.
7. Delmas JF, Dhersin JS, Siri-Jegousse A. Asymptotic results on the length of coalescent trees. Ann Appl Prob. 2008; 18:997-1025.
8. Donnelly P, Kurtz TG. Particle representations for measure-valued population models. Ann Probab. 1999; 27:166-205.
9. Eldon B, Wakeley J. Coalesent processes when the distribution of offspring number among individuals is highly skewed. Genetics. 2006; 172:2621-33.
10. Eldon B, Wakeley J. Coalescence times and F ST under a skewed offspring distribution among individuals in a population. Genetics. 2009; 181:615-29.
11. Eldon B. Estimation of parameters in large offspring number models and ratios of coalescence times. Theor Popul Biol. 2011; 80:16-28.
12. Eldon B, Degnan JH. Multiple merger gene genealogies in two species: monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly for two examples of Lambda coalescents. Theor Popul Biol. 2012; 82:117-30.
13. Eldon B, Birkner M, Blath J, Freund F. Can the Site-Frequency Spectrum Distinguish Exponential Population Growth from Multiple-Merger CoalescentsGenetics. 2015; 199:841-56.
14. Ewing G, Hermisson J. MSMS: a coalescent simulation program including recombination, demographic structure and selection at a single locus. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26:2064-65.
15. Excoffier L, Foll M. Fastsimcoal: a continuous-time coalescent simulator of genomic diversity under arbitrarily complex evolutionary scenarios. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27:9.
16. Goldstien SJ, Schiel DR, Gemmell NJ. Comparative phylogeography of coastal limpets across a marine disjunction in New Zealand. Mol Ecol. 2009; 15:3259-68.
17. Hedgecock D. In: (Beaumont A, editor.)Does variance in reproductive success limit effective population sizes of marine organisms? Genetics and Evolution of Aquatic Organisms. London: Chapman and Hall; 1994, pp. 1222-344.
18. Hedgecock D, Tracey M, Nelson K. In: (Abele LG, editor.)Genetics, The Biology of Crustacea vol. 2. New York: Academic Press; 1982, pp. 297-403.
19. Hedgecock D, Pudovkin AI. Sweepstakes reproductive success in highly fecund marine fish and shellfish: a review and commentary. Bull Mar Sci. 2011; 87:971-1002.
20. Heled J, Bryant D, Drummond AJ. BMC Evolut Biol. 2013; 13:44.
21. Hellenthal G, Stephens M. msHOT: modifying Hudson's ms simulator to incorporate crossover and gene conversion hotspots. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23:520-21.
22. Holland BR, Benthin S, Lockhart PJ, Moulton V, Huber KT. BMC Evol Biol. 2008; 8:202.
23. Hudson RR. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxford Surv Evol Biol. 1990; 7:1-44.
24. Hudson RR. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:337-38.
25. Huson D, Rupp R, Scornavacca C. Phylogenetic Networks: Concepts, Algorithms and Applications: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
26. Jones G, Sagitov S, Oxelman B. Statistical inference of allopolyploid species networks in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting. Syst Biol. 2013; 62:467-78.
27. Kingman JFC. On the genealogy of large populations. J App Probab. 1982; 19A:27-43.
28. Kubatko LS. Identifying hybridization events in the presence of coalescence via model selection. Syst Biol. 2009; 58:478-88.
29. Laval G, Excoffier L. SIMCOAL 2.0: a program to simulate genomic diversity over large recombining regions in a subdivided population with a complex history. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20:2485-87.
30. Liang L, Zöllner S, Abecasis GR. GENOME: a rapid coalescent-based whole genome simulator. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23:1565-67.
31. Meng C, Kubatko LS. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: A model. Theor Popul Biol. 2009; 75:35-45.
32. Mailund T, Schierup H, Pedersen CNS, Mechlenborg PJM, Madsen JN, Schauser L, et al. CoaSim a flexible environment for simulating genetic data under coalescent models. BMC Bioinforma. 2005; 6:252.
33. Olsen G. Gary Olsen's interpretation of the "Newick's 8:45" tree format standard. 1990. http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip/newick_doc.html . Access date 2/Sep/2015.
34. Perrin C, Wing SR, Roy MS. Effects of hydrographic barriers on population genetic structure of the sea star Coscinasterias muricata (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) in the New Zealand fiords. Mol Ecol. 2004; 13:2183-95.
35. Pitman J. Coalescents with multiple collisions. Ann Probab. 1999; 27:1870-902.
36. Sagitov S. The general coalescent with asynchronous mergers of ancestral lines. J Appl Probab. 1999; 36:1116-125.
37. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2015. http://www.R-project.org/ .
38. Sargsyan O, Wakeley J. A coalescent process with simultaneous multiple mergers for approximating the gene genealogies of many marine organisms. Theor Popul Biol. 2008; 74:104-114.
39. Schweinsberg J. Coalescent processes obtained from supercritical Galton-Watson processes. Stoch Proc Appl. 2003; 106:107-39.
40. Slatkin M. Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times. Genet. Res. 1991; 58:167-175.
41. Staab PR, Zhu S, Metzler D, Lunter G. Scrm: efficiently simulating long sequences using the approximated coalescent with recombination. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(10):1680-82.
42. Tellier A, Lemaire C.Coalescence 2.0: a multiple branching of recent theoretical developments and their applications. Mol Ecol. 2014; 23:2637-52.
43. Than C, Ruths D, Nakhleh L. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships. BMC Bioinforma. 2008; 9:322. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-322 .
44. Waters JM, Roy MS. Phylogeography of a high-dispersal New Zealand sea-star: does upwelling block gene-flowMol Ecol. 2004; 13:2797-806.
45. Yu Y, Than C, Degnan JH, Nakhleh L. Coalescent histories on phylogenetic networks and detection of hybridization despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst Biol. 2011; 60:138-49.
46. Yu Y, Degnan JH, Nakhleh L. The probability of a gene tree topology within a phylogenetic network with applications to hybridization detection. PLoS Genet. 2012; e1002660:8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002660 .