Multiple merger gene genealogies in two species: Monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly for two examples of Lambda coalescents

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 117-130

  Eldon, Bjarki ^a   Degnan, James H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Gene genealogies; Monophyly; Multiple merger coalescent processes; Species tree; Taxonomic distinctiveness

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DIVERGENCE; GENEALOGY; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS;

GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

EID: 84863882958     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Allman E.S., Degnan J.H., Rhodes J.A. Determining species tree topologies from clade probabilities under the coalescent. J. Theoret. Biol. 2011, 289:96-106.
2. Árnason E. Mitochondrial cytochrome b variation in the high-fecundity Atlantic cod: trans-Atlantic clines and shallow gene genealogy. Genetics 2004, 166:1871-1885.
3. Avise J.C. Gene trees and organismal histories: a phylogenetic approach to population biology. Evolution 1989, 43:1192-1208.
4. Beckenbach A.T. Mitochondrial haplotype frequencies in oysters: neutral alternatives to selection models. Non-Neutral Evolution 1994, 188-198. Chapman & Hall, New York. B. Golding (Ed.).
5. Birkner M., Blath J. Computing likelihoods for coalescents with multiple collisions in the infinitely many sites model. J. Math. Biol. 2008, 57:435-465.
6. Boudry P., Collet B., Cornette F., Hervouet V., Bonhomme F. High variance in reproductive success of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas, Thunberg) revealed by microsatellite-based parentage analysis of multifactorial crosses. Aquaculture 2002, 204:283-296.
7. Cannings C. The latent roots of certain Markov chains arising in genetics: a new approach, I. Haploid models. Adv. Appl. Probab. 1974, 6:260-290.
8. Cummings M.P., Otto S.P., Wakeley J. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1995, 12:814-822.
9. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference, and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:332-340.
10. Donnelly P., Kurtz T.G. Particle representations for measure-valued population models. Ann. Probab. 1999, 27:166-205.
11. Donnelly P., Tavaré S. Coalescents and genealogical structure under neutrality. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1995, 29:401-421.
12. Doyle J.J. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 1992, 17:144-163.
13. Eldon B. Structured coalescent processes from a modified Moran model with large offspring numbers. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2009, 76:92-104.
14. Eldon B. Estimation of parameters in large offspring number models and ratios of coalescence times. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2011, 80:16-28.
15. Eldon B., Wakeley J. Coalescent processes when the distribution of offspring number among individuals is highly skewed. Genetics 2006, 172:2621-2633.
16. Fisher R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 1930, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
17. Flowers J.M., Schroeter S.C., Burton R.S. The recruitment sweepstakes has many winners: genetic evidence from the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Evolution 2002, 56:1445-1453.
18. Forey P., Janvier P. Agnathans and the origin of jawed vertebrates. Nature 1993, 361:129-134.
19. Griffiths R.C. Exact sampling distributions from the infinite neutral alleles model. Adv. Appl. Probab. 1979, 11:326-354.
20. Hedgecock D. Does variance in reproductive success limit effective population sizes of marine organisms?. Genetics and Evolution of Aquatic Organisms 1994, 1222-1344. Chapman and Hall, London. A. Beaumont (Ed.).
21. Hedgecock D., Tracey M., Nelson K. Genetics. The Biology of Crustacea 1982, 2:297-403. Academic Press, New York. L.G. Abele (Ed.).
22. Hudson R.R. Gene genealogies and the coalescent. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 1990, 7:1-44. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D.J. Futuyma, J. Antonovics (Eds.).
23. Hudson R.R. Testing the constant-rate neutral allele model with protein sequence data. Evolution 1983, 37:203-217.
24. Hudson R.R., Coyne J.A. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 2002, 56:1557-1665.
25. Ingvarsson P.K. Nucleotide polymorphism, linkage disequilibrium and complex trait dissection in Populus. Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models 2010, vol. 8:91-111. Springer, New York. S. Jansson, R. Bhalerao, A. Groover (Eds.).
26. Kingman J.F.C. The coalescent. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 1982, 13:235-248.
27. Kingman J.F.C. Exchangeability and the evolution of large populations. Exchangeability in Probability and Statistics 1982, 97-112. North-Holland, Amsterdam. G. Koch, F. Spizzichino (Eds.).
28. Kingman J.F.C. On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Probab. 1982, 19A:27-43.
29. Knowles L.L., Carstens B.C. Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:887-895.
30. Liu L., Pearl D.K. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:504-514.
31. Liu L., Yu L., Pearl D.K., Edwards S.V. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:468-477.
32. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
33. McKenzie A., Steel M. Distributions of cherries for two models of trees. Math. Biosci. 2000, 164:81-92.
34. Meyer A. The evolution of body plans: HOM/Hox Cluser evolution, model systems, and the importance of phylogeny. New Uses for New Phylogenies 1996, 323-340. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.H. Harvey, A.J.L. Brown, J.M. Smith, S. Nee (Eds.).
35. Möhle M. Ancestral processes in population genetics: the coalescent. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 204:629-638.
36. Möhle M., Sagitov S. A classification of coalescent processes for haploid exchangeable population models. Ann. Probab. 2001, 29:1547-1562.
37. Moran P.A.P. Random processes in genetics. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1958, 54:60-71.
38. Moran P.A.P. Statistical Processes of Evolutionary Theory 1962, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
39. Nee S., Holmes E.C., Rambaut A., Harvey P.H. Inferring population histories from molecular phylogenies. New Uses for New Phylogenies 1996, 66-80. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.H. Harvey, A.J.L. Brown, J.M. Smith, S. Nee (Eds.).
40. Nei M. Stochastic errors in DNA evolution and molecular phylogeny. Evolutionary Perspectives and the New Genetics 1986, 133-147. A R Liss, New York. H. Gershowitz, D.L. Rucknagel, R.E. Tashian (Eds.).
41. Neigel J.E., Avise J.C. Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. Evolutionary Processes and Theory 1986, 515-534. Academic Press, New York. S. Karlin, E. Nevo (Eds.).
42. Nichols R. Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:358-364.
43. Nordborg M. Coalescent theory. Handbook of Statistical Genetics 2001, 179-212. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England. D.J. Balding, M.J. Bishop, C. Cannings (Eds.).
44. Otto S.P., Cummings M.P., Wakeley J. Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequence data: the effects of sampling. New Uses for New Phylogenies 1996, 103-115. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.H. Harvey, A.J.L. Brown, J.M. Smith, S. Nee (Eds.).
45. Palumbi S.R., Cipriano F., Hare M.P. Predicting nuclear gene coalescence from mitochondrial data: the three-times rule. Evolution 2001, 55:859-868.
46. Petersen J.L., Ibarra A.M., Ramirez J.L., May B. An induced mass spawn of the hermaphroditic Lion-Paw scallop Nodipecten subnodosus: Genetic assignment of maternal and paternal parentage. J. Heredity 2008, 99:337-348.
47. Pitman J. Coalescents with multiple collisions. Ann. Probab. 1999, 27:1870-1902.
48. Rosenberg N.A. The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evolution 2003, 57:1465-1477.
49. Rosenberg N.A. Counting coalescent histories. J. Comp. Biol. 2007, 14:360-377.
50. Rosenberg N.A., Nordborg M. Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:380-390.
51. Ruvolo M. Molecular evolutionary processes and conflicting gene trees: the Hominoid case. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1994, 94:89-113.
52. Sagitov S. The general coalescent with asynchronous mergers of ancestral lines. J. Appl. Probab. 1999, 36:1116-1125.
53. Sargsyan O., Wakeley J. A coalescent process with simultaneous multiple mergers for approximating the gene genealogies of many marine organisms. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2008, 74:104-114.
54. Satta Y., Klein J., Takahata N. DNA archives and our nearest relative: the trichotomy problem revisited. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2000, 14:259-275.
55. Schweinsberg J. Coalescent processes obtained from supercritical Galton-Watson processes. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 2003, 106:107-139.
56. Schweinsberg J. Coalescents with simultaneous multiple collisions. Electron. J. Probab. 2000, 5:1-50.
57. Schweinsberg J. A necessary and sufficient condition for the Λ-coalescent to come down from infinity. Electron. Comm. Probab. 2000, 5:1-11.
58. Stock D.W., Whitt G.S. Evidence from 18s ribosomal RNA sequences that lampreys and hagfishes form a natural group. Science 1992, 257:787-789.
59. Tavaré S. Lines-of-descent and genealogical processes, and their application in population genetic models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1984, 26:119-164.
60. Ting C., Tsaur S., Wu C. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:5313-5316.
61. Wakeley J. Coalescent Theory 2009, Roberts & Company, Greenwood Village, Colorado.
62. Wakeley J., Hey J. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 1997, 145:847-855.
63. Waters J.M., Roy M.S. Phylogeography of a high-dispersal New Zealand sea star: does upwelling block gene-flow?. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:2797-2806.
64. Watterson G.A. Mutant substitutions at linked nucleotide sites. Adv. Appl. Probab. 1982, 14:206-224.
65. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 1931, 16:97-159.
66. Zhu S., Degnan J.H., Steel M. Clades, clans, and reciprocal monophyly under neutral evolutionary models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2011, 79:220-227.