Time to a single hybridization event in a group of species with unknown ancestral history

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 322, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-6

  Bartoszek, Krzysztof ^a   Jones, Graham ^a,b   Oxelman, Bengt ^b   Sagitov, Serik ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Polyploidy; Theoretical phylogenetics; Uncertainty in phylogeny; Yule tree

Indexed keywords

HYBRIDIZATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; STOCHASTICITY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ARTICLE; BIRTH RATE; CALCULATION; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SPECIES COEXISTENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ANIMALS; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84873147574     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Albertin W., Marullo P. Polyploidy in fungi. evolution after whole-genome duplication. Proc. R. Soc. B 2012, 279:2497-2509.
2. Aldous D., Popovic L. A critical branching process model for biodiversity. Adv. Appl. Probab. 2005, 37:1094-1115.
3. Arnold M.L. Natural Hybridization and Evolution 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Bartoszek, K., Sagitov, S., 2012. Phylogenetic confidence intervals for the optimal trait value, arXiv:1207.6488.
5. Gernhard T. The conditioned reconstructed process. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 253:769-778.
6. Huson D., Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:254-267.
7. Huson D., Rupp R., Scornavacca C. Phylogenetic Networks. Concepts, Algorithms and Applications 2010, Cambridge University Press, New York.
8. Jin G., Nakhleh L., Snir S., Tuller T. Maximum likelihood of phylogenetic networks. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(21):2604-2611.
9. Jones, G., Sagitov, S., Oxelman, O., 2012. Statistical Inference of Allopolyploid Species Networks in the Presence of Incomplete Lineage Sorting, arXiv:1208.3606.
10. Kubatko L.S. Identifying hybridization events in the presence of coalescence via model selection. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:478-488.
11. Lemey P., Rambaut A., Drummond A.J., Suchard M.A. Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLoS Computat. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000520.
12. Makarenkov V., Kevorkov D., Legendre P. Phylogenetic network construction approaches. Appl. Mycol. Biotechnol. 2006, 6(C):61-97.
13. Mallet J. Hybrid speciation. Nature 2007, 446:279-283.
14. Mavárez J., Linares M. Homoploid hybrid speciation in animals. Molecul. Ecol. 2008, 17:4181-4185.
15. Meng C., Kubatko L.S. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence. a model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2009, 75:35-45.
16. Otto S.P., Whitton J. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2000, 34:401-437.
17. Paun O., Forest F., Fay M.F., Chase M.W. Hybridspeciation in angiosperms. parental divergence drives ploidy. New Phytol. 2009, 182:507-518.
18. Ronquist F. Bayesian inference of character evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:475-481.
19. Sagitov S., Bartoszek K. Interspecies correlation for the Brownian trait evolution with unknown phylogeny. J. Theor. Biol. 2012, 309:11-19.
20. Tate J.A., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S. Polyploidy in plants. The Evolution of the Genome 2005, Elsevier Academic Press, Inc, London, UK, New York. T.R. Gregory (Ed.).
21. Wood T.E., Takebayashi N., Barker M.S., Mayrose I., Greenspoon P.B., et al. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:13875-13879.
22. Woolley S.M., Posada D., Crandall K.A. A comparison of phylogenetic network methods using computer simulation. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(4):e1913.
23. Yu Y., Degnan J.H., Nakhleh L. The probability of a gene tree topology within a phylogenetic network with applications to hybridization detection. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002660.