Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Annals of Oncology

Volumn 26, Issue , 2015, Pages v8-v30

  Senkus, E ^a   Kyriakides, S ^b   Ohno, S ^c   Penault Llorca, F ^d,e   Poortmans, P ^f   Rutgers, E ^g   Zackrisson, S ^h   Cardoso, F ⁱ  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK   (Poland)

^b Europa Donna Cyprus   (Cyprus)

^c CANCER INSTITUTE HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d CENTRE JEAN PERRIN   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^f RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^h LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

ⁱ CHAMPALIMAUD CLINICAL CENTER   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTROZOLE; BISPHOSPHONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; DOCETAXEL; EXEMESTANE; FLUOROURACIL; LAPATINIB; LETROZOLE; METHOTREXATE; PACLITAXEL; PERTUZUMAB; TAMOXIFEN; TAXANE DERIVATIVE; TRASTUZUMAB;

ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FOLLOW UP; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MASTECTOMY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MULTIPLE CYCLE TREATMENT; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE FRACTIONATION; RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; PATHOLOGY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASM STAGING;

EID: 84941624753     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: 15698041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298     Document Type: Article

References (163)

1. http://eco.iarc.fr/EUCAN/CancerOne.aspx?Cancer=46&Gender=2#block-table-f (30 July 2015, date last accessed).
2. McTiernan A. Behavioral risk factors in breast cancer: can risk be modified? Oncologist 2003; 8: 326-334.
3. Autier P, Boniol M, La Vecchia C et al. Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database. BMJ 2010; 341: c3620.
4. Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25, 676, 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet 2015; 385: 977-1010.
5. Ottini L, Palli D, Rizzo S et al. Male breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010; 73: 141-155.
6. Giordano L, von Karsa L, Tomatis M et al. Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation. J Med Screen 2012; 19(Suppl 1): 72-82.
7. Perry N, Broeders M, deWolf C et al. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edition. Luxembourg: European Commission Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2006.
8. Association of European Cancer Leagues. European Union Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening. http://www.europeancancerleagues.org/cancer-in-europe/resources-on-cancer-in-europe/82-eu-council-recommendationon-cancer-screening.html (30 July 2015, date last accessed).
9. Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 1: CD001877.
10. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D et al. Breast-cancer screening-viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2353-2358.
11. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 2012; 380: 1778-1786.
12. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 671-679.
13. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 1296-1316.
14. Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 609-618.
15. Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1455-1461.
16. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ et al. WHO Classification of Tumours, 4th edition. Lyon: IARC WHO Classification of Tumours, IARC Press 2012.
17. Hammond ME. American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists guidelines for breast predictive factor testing: an update. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2011; 19: 499-500.
18. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3997-4013.
19. Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, A'Hern R et al. Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki-67 Breast Cancer Working Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1656-1664.
20. Guiu S, Michiels S, André F et al. Molecular subclasses of breast cancer: how do we define them? The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Statement. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 2997-3006.
21. Mann GB, Fahey VD, Feleppa F, Buchanan MR. Reliance on hormone receptor assays of surgical specimens may compromise outcome in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5148-5154.
22. Chen X, Yuan Y, Gu Z, Shen K. Accuracy of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status between core needle and open excision biopsy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 134: 957-967.
23. Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A et al. Tailoring therapies-improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1533-1546.
24. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC (eds). AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook, 7th edition. New York, NY: Springer 2010.
25. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 5287-5312.
26. Koolen BB, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Aukema TS et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 131: 117-126.
27. Robertson IJ, Hand F, Kell MR. FDG-PET/CT in the staging of local/regional metastases in breast cancer. Breast 2011; 20: 491-494.
28. Blamey RW, Pinder SE, Ball GR et al. Reading the prognosis of the individual with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43: 1545-1547.
29. Ravdin PM, Siminoff LA, Davis GJ et al. Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 980-991.
30. Wishart GC, Bajdik CD, Azzato EM et al. A population-based validation of the prognostic model PREDICT for early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37: 411-417.
31. Harbeck N, Sotlar K, Wuerstlein R, Doisneau-Sixou S. Molecular and protein markers for clinical decision making in breast cancer: today and tomorrow. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 40: 434-444.
32. Wazir U, Mokbel K. Emerging gene-based prognostic tools in early breast cancer: first steps to personalised medicine. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5: 795-799.
33. Drukker CA, Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Retèl VP et al. A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study. Int J Cancer 2013; 133: 929-936.
34. Bossuyt V, Provenzano E, Symmans WF et al. Recommendations for standardized pathological characterization of residual disease for neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer by the BIG-NABCG collaboration. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1280-1291.
35. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM305501.pdf (30 July 2015, date last accessed).
36. Del Turco MR, Ponti A, Bick U et al. Quality indicators in breast cancer care. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2344-2356.
37. EUSOMA. The requirements of a specialist breast unit. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 2288-2293.
38. Wilson AR, Marotti L, Bianchi S et al. The requirements of a specialist Breast Centre. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49: 3579-3587.
39. Pruthi S, Gostout BS, Lindor NM. Identification and management of women with BRCA mutations or hereditary predisposition for breast and ovarian cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85: 1111-1120.
40. Senkus E, Gomez H, Dirix L et al. Young breast cancer patients' attitudes towards the risk of loss of fertility related to adjuvant therapies. EORTC study 10002 BIG 3-98. Psychooncology 2014; 23: 173-182.
41. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2917-2931.
42. Partridge AH, Pagani O, Abulkhair O et al. First international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY1). Breast 2014; 23: 209-220.
43. Cardoso F, Loibl S, Pagani O et al. The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists recommendations for the management of young women with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48: 3355-3377.
44. Association of Breast Surgery at Baso 2009. Surgical guidelines for the management of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35(Suppl 1): 1-22.
45. Schnitt SJ, Moran MS, Houssami N, Morrow M. The Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer: perspectives for pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139: 575-577.
46. Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 3219-3232.
47. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breastconserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 1507-1515.
48. Poortmans P, Aznar M, Bartelink H. Quality indicators for breast cancer: revisiting historical evidence in the context of technology changes. Semin Radiat Oncol 2012; 22: 29-39.
49. Chatterjee JS, Lee A, Anderson W et al. Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on autologous deep inferior epigastric perforator flap volume after immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1135-1140.
50. Senkus-Konefka E, Welnicka-Jaśkiewicz M, Jaśkiewicz J, Jassem J. Radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients undergoing breast reconstruction or augmentation. Cancer Treat Rev 2004; 30: 671-682.
51. Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 1303-1310.
52. Gebruers N, Verbelen H, De Vrieze T et al. Incidence and time path of lymphedema in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96: 1131-1139.
53. Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB et al.; American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 1365-1383.
54. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 927-933.
55. Giuliano AE, Hawes D, Ballman KV et al. Association of occult metastases in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow with survival among women with earlystage invasive breast cancer. JAMA 2011; 306: 385-393.
56. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer Version 3.2014, http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (30 July 2015, date last accessed).
57. Kaufmann M, Morrow M, von Minckwitz G et al. Locoregional treatment of primary breast cancer: consensus recommendations from an International expert panel. Cancer 2010; 116: 1184-1191.
58. Weaver DL. Pathology evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: protocol recommendations and rationale. Mod Pathol 2010; 23(Suppl 2): S26-S32.
59. Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 297-305.
60. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2011; 305: 569-575.
61. Leidenius M, Salmenkivi K, von Smitten K, Heikkila P. Tumour-positive sentinel node findings in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94: 380-384.
62. Moore KH, Sweeney KJ, Wilson ME et al. Outcomes for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ and a positive sentinel node: a multi-institutional audit. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 2911-2917.
63. Meijnen P, Oldenburg HS, Loo CE et al. Risk of invasion and axillary lymph node metastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core-needle biopsy. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 952-956.
64. Yen TW, Hunt KK, Ross MI et al. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200: 516-526.
65. Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Cole DE et al. Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 1694-1706.
66. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72: 1117-1130.
67. Liebens FP, Carly B, Pastijn A, Rozenberg S. Management of BRCA1/2 associated breast cancer: a systematic qualitative review of the state of knowledge in 2006. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43: 238-257.
68. Hwang ES, Lichtensztajn DY, Gomez SL et al. Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status. Cancer 2013; 119: 1402-1411.
69. Darby S, McGale P et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10, 801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011; 378: 1707-1716.
70. Werkhoven EV, Hart G, Tinteren HV et al. Nomogram to predict ipsilateral breast relapse based on pathology review from the EORTC 22881-10882 boost versus no boost trial. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100: 101-107.
71. Bartelink H, Maingon P, Poortmans P et al. Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 47-56.
72. Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Maisonneuve P et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy versus external radiotherapy for early breast cancer (ELIOT): a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 1269-1277.
73. Vaidya JS, Wenz F, Bulsara M et al. Risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast radiotherapy for breast cancer: 5-year results for local control and overall survival from the TARGIT-A randomised trial. Lancet 2014; 383: 603-613.
74. Polgár C, Van Limbergen E, Potter R et al. Patient selection for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after breast-conserving surgery: recommendations of the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) breast cancer working group based on clinical evidence (2009). Radiother Oncol 2010; 94: 264-273.
75. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383: 2127-2135.
76. Kyndi M, Overgaard M, Nielsen HM et al. High local recurrence risk is not associated with large survival reduction after postmastectomy radiotherapy in high-risk breast cancer: a subgroup analysis of DBCG 82 b&c. Radiother Oncol 2009; 90: 74-79.
77. Poortmans PM, Collette S, Kirkove C, et al. Internal mammary and medial supraclavicular irradiation in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 317-327.
78. Whelan TJ, Olivotto IA, Parulekar WR, et al. Regional nodal irradiation in earlystage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 307-316.
79. Thorsen LBJ, Berg M, Brodersen HJ et al. DBCG-IM: improved survival with internal mammary node irradiation: a prospective study on 3, 072 breast cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2014; (Suppl 1): abstr OC-0148.
80. Poortmans P. Postmastectomy radiation in breast cancer with one to three involved lymph nodes: ending the debate. Lancet 2014; 383: 2104-2106.
81. Offersen BV, Boersma LJ, Kirkove C et al. ESTRO consensus guideline on target volume delineation for elective radiation therapy of early stage breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015; 114: 3-10.
82. Whelan TJ, Pignol JP, Levine MN et al. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 513-520.
83. Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trial B of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 1098-1107.
84. Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 331-341.
85. Adams S, Chakravarthy AB, Donach M et al. Preoperative concurrent paclitaxelradiation in locally advanced breast cancer: pathologic response correlates with five-year overall survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 124: 723-732.
86. Goodwin A, Parker S, Ghersi D, Wilcken N. Post-operative radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast-a systematic review of the randomized trials. Breast 2009; 18: 143-149.
87. Morrow M, Schnitt SJ, Norton L. Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015; 12: 227-238.
88. Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K et al. Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4888-4894.
89. Peto R, Davies C et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100, 000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012; 379: 432-444.
90. Harbeck N, Kates RE, Look MP et al. Enhanced benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients classified high-risk according to urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (n=3424). Cancer Res 2002; 62: 4617-4622.
91. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifentreated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2817-2826.
92. Azim HA, Jr, Michiels S, Zagouri F et al. Utility of prognostic genomic tests in breast cancer practice: the IMPAKT 2012 working group consensus statement. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 647-654.
93. Dowsett M, Sestak I, Lopez-Knowles E et al. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2783-2790.
94. Dubsky P, Brase JC, Jakesz R et al. The EndoPredict score provides prognostic information on late distant metastases in ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2013; 109: 2959-2964.
95. Tolaney SM, Barry WT, Dang CT et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 134-141.
96. Albain KS, Barlow WE, Ravdin PM et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy and timing of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 2055-2063.
97. Colleoni M, Gelber S et al. Tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal women with lymph node-positive breast cancer: International Breast Cancer Study Group trial 13-93. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1332-1341.
98. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005; 365: 1687-1717.
99. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S et al. A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1793-1802.
100. Cuzick J, Ambroisine L et al. Use of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonists as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with hormonereceptor-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised adjuvant trials. Lancet 2007; 369: 1711-1723.
101. Davidson NE, O'Neill AM, Vukov AM et al. Chemoendocrine therapy for premenopausal women with axillary lymph node-positive, steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: results from INT 0101 (E5188). J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5973-5982.
102. Swain SM, Jeong JH, Wolmark N. Amenorrhea from breast cancer therapy-not a matter of dose. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2268-2270.
103. Pagani O, O'Neill A, Castiglione M et al. Prognostic impact of amenorrhoea after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 632-640.
104. Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF et al. Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 436-446.
105. Gnant M, Mlineritsch B, Schippinger W et al. Endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 679-691.
106. Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA et al. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 107-118.
107. Jonat W, Kaufmann M, Sauerbrei W et al. Goserelin versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: the Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association study. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4628-4635.
108. Moore HC, Unger JM, Phillips KA et al. Goserelin for ovarian protection during breast-cancer adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 923-932.
109. Bliss JM, Kilburn LS, Coleman RE et al. Disease-related outcomes with long-term follow-up: an updated analysis of the intergroup exemestane study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 709-717.
110. Regan MM, Neven P, Giobbie-Hurder A et al. Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in sequence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical trial at 8.1 years median follow-up. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 1101-1108.
111. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M et al. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 1135-1141.
112. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Pater JL et al. Late extended adjuvant treatment with letrozole improves outcome in women with early-stage breast cancer who complete 5 years of tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 1948-1955.
113. Burstein HJ, Prestrud AA, Seidenfeld J et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3784-3796.
114. Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Ingle J et al. Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 509-518.
115. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 805-816.
116. Regan MM, Leyland-Jones B, Bouzyk M, et al. CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: the breast international group 1-98 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104: 441-451.
117. Sideras K, Ingle JN, Ames MM et al. Coprescription of tamoxifen and medications that inhibit CYP2D6. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 2768-2776.
118. Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Henderson IC et al. Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. JAMA 2006; 295: 1658-1667.
119. Clarke M, Coates AS, Darby SC et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in oestrogen receptor-poor breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2008; 371: 29-40.
120. Geyer CE, Jr, Samuel JA, Wilson JW et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) to four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in patients ( pts) with nodenegative breast cancer. SABCS 2014; S3-02.
121. Di Leo A, Desmedt C, Bartlett JM et al. HER2 And TOP2A as predictive markers for anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 1134-1142.
122. Gianni L, Baselga J, Eiermann W et al. Phase III trial evaluating the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2474-2481.
123. Shao N, Wang S, Yao C et al. Sequential versus concurrent anthracyclines and taxanes as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized control trials. Breast 2012; 21: 389-393.
124. Earl HM, Vallier AL, Hiller L et al. Effects of the addition of gemcitabine, and paclitaxel-first sequencing, in neoadjuvant sequential epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel for women with high-risk early breast cancer (Neo-tAnGo): an openlabel, 2×2 factorial randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 201-212.
125. Jones S, Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy J et al. Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: 7-year follow-up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1177-1183.
126. Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1431-1439.
127. Gianni L, Dafni U, Gelber RD et al. Treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 236-244.
128. Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 3744-3752.
129. Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1273-1283.
130. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Litton JK, Broglio KR et al. High risk of recurrence for patients with breast cancer who have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, node-negative tumors 1 cm or smaller. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5700-5706.
131. Joensuu H, Bono P, Kataja V et al. Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide with either docetaxel or vinorelbine, with or without trastuzumab, as adjuvant treatments of breast cancer: final results of the FinHer Trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5685-5692.
132. Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ et al. 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 1021-1028.
133. Pivot X, Romieu G, Debled M et al. 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHARE): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 741-748.
134. Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H et al. Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 633-640.
135. Guarneri V, Frassoldati A, Bottini A et al. Preoperative chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: results of the randomized phase II CHER-LOB study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 1989-1995.
136. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, openlabel, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 25-32.
137. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Holmes AP, Baselga J et al. First results from the phase III ALTTO trial (BIG 2-06; NCCTG [Alliance] N063D) comparing one year of anti-HER2 therapy with lapatinib alone (L), trastuzumab alone (T), their sequence (T?L), or their combination (T+L) in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(suppl 5s); abstr LBA4.
138. Coleman R, Cameron D, Dodwell D et al. Adjuvant zoledronic acid in patients with early breast cancer: final efficacy analysis of the AZURE (BIG 01/04) randomized open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 997-1006.
139. Coleman R, Gnant M, Paterson A et al. Effects of bisphosphonate treatment on recurrence and cause-specific mortality in women with early breast cancer: a metaanalysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. SABCS 2013; S4-07.
140. Eidtmann H, de Boer R, Bundred N et al. Efficacy of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole: 36-month results of the ZO-FAST study. Ann Oncol 2010; 21: 2188-2194.
141. Reid DM, Doughty J, Eastell R et al. Guidance for the management of breast cancer treatment-induced bone loss: a consensus position statement from a UK Expert Group. Cancer Treat Rev 2008; 34(Suppl 1): S3-S18.
142. Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2055-2065.
143. Perrone F, Nuzzo F, Di Rella F et al. Weekly docetaxel versus CMF as adjuvant chemotherapy for older women with early breast cancer: final results of the randomized phase III ELDA trial. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 675-682.
144. Crivellari D, Gray KP, Dellapasqua S et al. Adjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for older women with endocrine nonresponsive breast cancer who are NOT suitable for a 'standard chemotherapy regimen': the CASA randomized trial. Breast 2013; 22: 130-137.
145. Staley H, McCallum I, Bruce J. Postoperative tamoxifen for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD007847.
146. Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of? National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 778-785.
147. von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 747-756.
148. Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM et al. Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 13-21.
149. Rugo HS, Olopade O, DeMichele A et al. Veliparib/carboplatin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer: first efficacy results from the ISPY 2 TRIAL. SABCS 2013; S5-02.
150. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Nüesch E et al. Impact of treatment characteristics on response of different breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 125: 145-156.
151. Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S et al. Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the Pre-Operative 'Arimidex' compared to tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer 2006; 106: 2095-2103.
152. Smith IE, Dowsett M, Ebbs SR et al. Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the immediate preoperative anastrozole, tamoxifen, or combined with tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5108-5116.
153. Eiermann W, Paepke S, Appfelstaedt J et al. Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 1527-1532.
154. Eggemann H, Ignatov A, Smith BJ et al. Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen compared to aromatase inhibitors for 257 male breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 137: 465-470.
155. Korde LA, Zujewski JA, Kamin L et al. Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 2114-2122.
156. Sousa B, Moser E, Cardoso F. An update on male breast cancer and future directions for research and treatment. Eur J Pharmacol 2013; 717: 71-83.
157. Cardoso F, Bartlett J, Slaets L et al. Characterization of male breast cancer: first results of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male BC Program'. SABCS 2014; S6-05.
158. Allemani C, Minicozzi P, Berrino F et al. Predictions of survival up to 10 years after diagnosis for European women with breast cancer in 2000-2002. Int J Cancer 2013; 132: 2404-2412.
159. Park S, Koo JS, Kim MS et al. Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry. Breast 2012; 21: 50-57.
160. Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D et al. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA 2005; 293: 2479-2486.
161. Chlebowski RT, Aiello E, McTiernan A. Weight loss in breast cancer patient management. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1128-1143.
162. Holmberg L, Iversen OE, Rudenstam CM et al. Increased risk of recurrence after hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 475-482.
163. Dykewicz CA. Summary of the guidelines for preventing opportunistic infections among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 139-144.