Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: The effect of age and hormone receptor status

Cancer

Volumn 119, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1402-1411

  Hwang, E Shelley ^a   Lichtensztajn, Daphne Y ^c   Gomez, Scarlett Lin ^c   Fowble, Barbara ^b   Clarke, Christina A ^c  

^a DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Cancer Prevention Institute of California (CPIC)   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SPECIFIC SURVIVAL; EARLY CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIOECONOMICS; TREND STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTIGENS, CD4; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84875382295     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27795     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Albain KS, Green SR, Lichter AS, et al. Influence of patient characteristics, socioeconomic factors, geography, and systemic risk on the use of breast-sparing treatment in women enrolled in adjuvant breast cancer studies: an analysis of two intergroup trials. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14: 3009-3017.
2. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS,. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 1102-1107.
3. Gilligan MA, Kneusel RT, Hoffmann RG, Greer AL, Nattinger AB,. Persistent differences in sociodemographic determinants of breast conserving treatment despite overall increased adoption. Med Care. 2002; 40: 181-189.
4. Freedman RA, He Y, Winer EP, Keating NL,. Trends in racial and age disparities in definitive local therapy of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 713-719.
5. Gross CP, Smith BD, Wolf E, Andersen M,. Racial disparities in cancer therapy: did the gap narrow between 1992 and 2002? Cancer. 2008; 112: 900-908.
6. Gomez SL, Lichtensztajn D, Kurian AW, et al. Increasing mastectomy rates for early-stage breast cancer? Population-based trends from California. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: e155-e157.
7. Itakura K, Lessing J, Sakata T, et al. The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011; 11: 33-38.
8. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4082-4088.
9. van der Sangen MJ, van de Wiel FM, Poortmans PM, et al. Are breast conservation and mastectomy equally effective in the treatment of young women with early breast cancer? Long-term results of a population-based cohort of 1,451 patients aged â 40 years. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 127: 207-215.
10. Jones HA, Antonini N, Hart AA, et al. Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast-conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4939-4947.
11. Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W,. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control. 2001; 12: 703-711.
12. Nguyen PL, Taghian AG, Katz MS, et al. Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 2373-2378.
13. Boscoe FP, Johnson CJ, Henry KA, et al. Geographic proximity to treatment for early stage breast cancer and likelihood of mastectomy. Breast. 2011; 20: 324-328.
14. Smith GL, Shih YC, Xu Y, et al. Racial disparities in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a national Medicare study. Cancer. 2010; 116: 734-741.
15. Chagpar AB, Studts JL, Scoggins CR, et al. Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2006; 106: 1462-1466.
16. Elward KS, Penberthy LT, Bear H, Swartz DM, Boudreau RM, Cook SS,. Variation in the use of breast-conserving therapy for Medicare beneficiaries in Virginia: clinical, geographic, and hospital characteristics. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1998; 6: 63-69.
17. Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman AK, et al. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009; 302: 1551-1556.
18. Giordano SH, Kuo YF, Duan Z, Hortobagyi GN, Freeman J, Goodwin JS,. Limits of observational data in determining outcomes from cancer therapy. Cancer. 2008; 112: 2456-2466.
19. Jagsi R, Abrahamse P, Hawley ST, Graff JJ, Hamilton AS, Katz SJ,. Underascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data. Cancer. 2012; 118: 333-341.
20. Virnig BA, Warren JL, Cooper GS, Klabunde CN, Schussler N, Freeman J,. Studying radiation therapy using SEER-Medicare-linked data. Med Care. 2002; 40 (8 suppl): IV-49 to IV-54.