In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins

Biomaterials

Volumn 71, Issue , 2015, Pages 145-157

  Thurber, Amy E ^a,b   Omenetto, Fiorenzo G ^a   Kaplan, David L ^a  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Foreign body response; Immune response; Inflammatory response; Silk fibroin; Tissue engineering; Vascularization

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; CELL SIGNALING; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; CONSUMER PRODUCTS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PROTEINS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; SILK FIBROIN; VASCULARIZATION;

TISSUE;

BIOMATERIAL; POLYMER; SILK FIBROIN; PROTEIN; SILK;

CERAMICS; DEGRADATION; FOREIGN BODY; GIANT CELL; GRANULATION TISSUE; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL; IMMUNOGENICITY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFLAMMATION; MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION; MINERALIZATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE GROWTH; VASCULARIZATION; ANIMAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROTEINS; SILK;

EID: 84941550932     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.039     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Omenetto F.G., Kaplan D.L. New opportunities for an ancient material. Science 2010, 329(5991):528-531.
2. Sutherland T.D., Young J.H., Weisman S., Hayashi C.Y., Merritt D.J. Insect silk: one name, many materials. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55:171-188.
3. Altman G.H., Diaz F., Jakuba C., Calabro T., Horan R.L., Chen J., et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2003, 24(3):401-416.
4. Aramwit P., Kanokpanont S., De-Eknamkul W., Srichana T. Monitoring of inflammatory mediators induced by silk sericin. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 107(5):556-561.
5. Wang Z., Zhang Y., Zhang J., Huang L., Liu J., Li Y., et al. Exploring natural silk protein sericin for regenerative medicine: an injectable, photoluminescent, cell-adhesive 3D hydrogel. Sci. Rep. 2014, 20(4):7064.
6. Rnjak-Kovacina J., DesRochers T.M., Burke K.A., Kaplan D.L. The effect of sterilization on silk fibroin biomaterial properties. Macromol. Biosci. 2015, 10.1002/mabi.201500013. (1616-5195 (Electronic); 1616-5187 (Linking)). 10.1002/mabi.201500013.
7. Rockwood D.N., Preda R.C., Yucel T., Wang X., Lovett M.L., Kaplan D.L. Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6(10):1612-1631.
8. Altman G., Horan R., Lu H., Moreau J., Martin I., Richmond J., et al. Silk matrix for tissue engineered anterior cruciate ligaments. Biomaterials 2002, 23(20):4131-4141.
9. Li C., Vepari C., Jin H., Kim H., Kaplan D. Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27(16):3115-3124.
10. Wray L.S., Hu X., Gallego J., Georgakoudi I., Omenetto F.G., Schmidt D., et al. Effect of processing on silk-based biomaterials: reproducibility and biocompatibility. J. Biomed. Mater Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2011, 99(1):89-101.
11. Wang Y., Kim H., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan D.L. Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials 2006, 27(36):6064-6082.
12. Meinel L., Hofmann S., Karageorgiou V., Kirker-Head C., McCool J., Gronowicz G., et al. The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2005, 26(2):147-155.
13. Navone S.E., Pascucci L., Dossena M., Ferri A., Invernici G., Acerbi F., et al. Decellularized silk fibroin scaffold primed with adipose mesenchymal stromal cells improves wound healing in diabetic mice. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014, 14(5):7.
14. Spelzini F., Konstantinovic M.L., Guelinckx I., Verbist G., Verbeken E., De Ridder D., et al. Tensile strength and host response towards silk and type i polypropylene implants used for augmentation of fascial repair in a rat model. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2007, 63(3):155-162.
15. Wang Y., Rudym D.D., Walsh A., Abrahamsen L., Kim H., Kim H.S., et al. In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008, 29(24-25):3415-3428.
16. Etienne O., Schneider A., Kluge J.A., Bellemin-Laponnaz C., Polidori C., Leisk G.G., et al. Soft tissue augmentation using silk gels: an in vitro and in vivo study. J. Periodontol. 2009, 80(11):1852-1858.
17. Seo Y.K., Yoon H.H., Park Y.S., Song K.Y., Lee W.S., Park J.K. Correlation between scaffold in vivo biocompatibility and in vitro cell compatibility using mesenchymal and mononuclear cell cultures. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2009, 25(5):513-522.
18. Guan G., Bai L., Zuo B., Li M., Wu Z., Li Y., et al. Promoted dermis healing from full-thickness skin defect by porous silk fibroin scaffolds (PSFSs). Biomed. Mater Eng. 2010, 20(5):295-308.
19. Ghaznavi A.M., Kokai L.E., Lovett M.L., Kaplan D.L., Marra K.G. Silk fibroin conduits a cellular and functional assessment of peripheral nerve repair. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2011, 66(3):273-279.
20. Ge Z., Yang Q., Xiang X., Liu K. Assessment of silk fibroin for the repair of buccal mucosa in a rat model. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012, 41(5):673-680.
21. Huang W., Begum R., Barber T., Ibba V., Tee N.C.H., Hussain M., et al. Regenerative potential of silk conduits in repair of peripheral nerve injury in adult rats. Biomaterials 2012, 33(1):59-71.
22. Kuboyama N., Kiba H., Arai K., Uchida R., Tanimoto Y., Bhawal U.K., et al. Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for bone regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2013, 101(2):295-302.
23. Uebersax L., Apfel T., Nuss K.M.R., Vogt R., Kim H.Y., Meinel L., et al. Biocompatibility and osteoconduction of macroporous silk fibroin implants in cortical defects in sheep. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2013, 85(1):107-118.
24. Castellano D., Blanes M., Marco B., Cerrada I., Ruiz-Sauri A., Pelacho B., et al. A comparison of electrospun polymers reveals poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) fiber as a superior scaffold for cardiac repair. Stem Cells Dev. 2014, 23(13):1479-1490.
25. Critchfield A.S., Mccabe R., Klebanov N., Richey L., Socrate S., Norwitz E.R., et al. Biocompatibility of a sonicated silk gel for cervical injection during pregnancy: in vivo and in vitro study. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 21(10):1266-1273.
26. Kweon H., Kim S., Choi J. Inhibition of foreign body giant cell formation by 4-hexylresorcinol through suppression of diacylglycerol kinase delta gene expression. Biomaterials 2014, 35(30):8576-8584.
27. Kwon S., Chung J., Park H., Jiang Y., Park J., Seo Y. Silk and collagen scaffolds for tendon reconstruction. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H-J Eng. Med. 2014, 228(4):388-396.
28. Liu H., Wise S.G., Rnjak-Kovacina J., Kaplan D.L., Bilek M.M.M., Weiss A.S., et al. Biocompatibility of silk-tropoelastin protein polymers. Biomaterials 2014, 35(19):5138-5147.
29. Unger R.E., Ghanaati S., Orth C., Sartoris A., Barbeck M., Halstenberg S., et al. The rapid anastomosis between prevascularized networks on silk fibroin scaffolds generated in vitro with cocultures of human microvascular endothelial and osteoblast cells and the host vasculature. Biomaterials 2010, 31(27):6959-6967.
30. Ghanaati S., Unger R.E., Webber M.J., Barbeck M., Orth C., Kirkpatrick J.A., et al. Scaffold vascularization in vivo driven by primary human osteoblasts in concert with host inflammatory cells. Biomaterials 2011, 32(32):8150-8160.
31. Hofmann S., Hilbe M., Fajardo R.J., Hagenmuller H., Nuss K., Arras M., et al. Remodeling of tissue-engineered bone structures in vivo. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2013, 85(1):119-129.
32. Rnjak-Kovacina J., Wray L.S., Golinski J.M., Kaplan D.L. Arrayed hollow channels in silk-based scaffolds provide functional outcomes for engineering critically-sized tissue constructs. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24(15):2188-2196.
33. Zhang W., Zhu C., Wu Y., Ye D., Wang S., Zou D., et al. VEGF and BMP-2 promote bone regeneration by facilitating bone marrow stem cell homing and differentiation. Eur. Cell Mater. 2014, 27(1):11. discussion 11-2.
34. Zhou C., Confalonieri F., Jacquet M., Perasso R., Li Z., Janin J. Silk fibroin: structural implications of a remarkable amino acid sequence. Proteins 2001, 44(2):119-122.
35. Arai T., Freddi G., Innocenti R., Tsukada M. Biodegradation of Bombyx mori silk fibroin fibers and films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91(4):2383-2390.
36. Numata K., Cebe P., Kaplan D.L. Mechanism of enzymatic degradation of beta-sheet crystals. Biomaterials 2010, 31(10):2926-2933.
37. Horan R., Antle K., Collette A., Huang Y., Huang J., Moreau J., et al. In vitro degradation of silk fibroin. Biomaterials 2005, 26(17):3385-3393.
38. Brown J., Lu C., Coburn J., Kaplan D.L. Impact of silk biomaterial structure on proteolysis. Acta Biomater. 2015, 1(11):212-221.
39. Sengupta S., Park S., Seok G.E., Patel A., Numata K., Lu C., et al. Quantifying osteogenic cell degradation of silk biomaterials. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11(12):3592-3599.
40. Dewair M., Baur X., Ziegler K. Use of immunoblot technique for detection of human IgE and IgG antibodies to individual silk proteins. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1985, 76(4):537-542.
41. Murphy K., Travers P., Walport M., Janeway C. Janeway's Immunobiology 2012, Garland Science, New York. 8th ed.
42. Anderson J. Biological responses to materials. Ann. Rev. Mater Res. 2001, 31:81-110.
43. Anderson J.M., Rodriguez A., Chang D.T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin. Immunol. 2008, 20(2):86-100.
44. Enomoto S., Sumi M., Kajimoto K., Nakazawa Y., Takahashi R., Takabayashi C., et al. Long-term patency of small-diameter vascular graft made from fibroin, a silk-based biodegradable material. J. Vasc. Surg. 2010, 51(1):155-164.
45. Mantovani A., Biswas S.K., Galdiero M.R., Sica A., Locati M. Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling. J. Pathol. 2013, 229(2):176-185.
46. Yoon S.J., Kim S.H., Ha H.J., Ko Y.K., So J.W., Kim M.S., et al. Reduction of inflammatory reaction of poly(D,L-lactic-Co-glycolic acid) using demineralized bone particles. Tissue Eng. Part A 2008, 14(4):539-547.
47. Murayama Y., Vinuela F., Tateshima S., Gonzalez N., Song J., Mahdavieh H., et al. Cellular responses of bioabsorbable polymeric material and Guglielmi detachable coil in experimental aneurysms. Stroke 2002, 33(4):1120-1128.
48. Athanasiou K., Niederauer G., Agrawal C. Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid polyglycolic acid copolymers. Biomaterials 1996, 17(2):93-102.
49. Cao Y., Mitchell G., Messina A., Price L., Thompson E., Penington A., et al. The influence of architecture on degradation and tissue ingrowth into three-dimensional poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2006, 27(14):2854-2864.
50. Jones K.S. Effects of biomaterial-induced inflammation on fibrosis and rejection. Semin. Immunol. 2008, 20(2):130-136.
51. Thevenot P.T., Nair A.M., Shen J., Lotfi P., Ko C., Tang L. The effect of incorporation of SDF-1 alpha into PLGA scaffolds on stem cell recruitment and the inflammatory response. Biomaterials 2010, 31(14):3997-4008.
52. Kim M.S., Ahn H.H., Shin Y.N., Cho M.H., Khang G., Lee H.B. An in vivo study of the host tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of PLGA- and/or porcine small intestinal submucosa-based scaffolds. Biomaterials 2007, 28(34):5137-5143.
53. Chevallay B., Herbage D. Collagen-based biomaterials as 3D scaffold for cell cultures: applications for tissue engineering and gene therapy. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2000, 38(2):211-218.
54. Lee C., Singla A., Lee Y. Biomedical applications of collagen. Int. J. Pharm. 2001, 221(1-2):1-22.
55. Song E., Kim S., Chun T., Byun H., Lee Y. Collagen scaffolds derived from a marine source and their biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2006, 27(15):2951-2961.
56. Vanluyn M., Vanwachem P., Leta R., Blaauw E., Nieuwenhuis P. Modulation of the tissue reaction to biomaterials .1. Biocompatibility of cross-linked dermal sheep collagens after macrophage depletion. J. Mater Sci. Mater. Med. 1994, 5(9-10):671-678.
57. Lyons F.G., Al-Munajjed A.A., Kieran S.M., Toner M.E., Murphy C.M., Duffy G.P., et al. The healing of bony defects by cell-free collagen-based scaffolds compared to stem cell-seeded tissue engineered constructs. Biomaterials 2010, 31(35):9232-9243.
58. Anselme K., Petite H., Herbage D. Inhibition of calcification in vivo by acyl azide cross-linking of a collagen-glycosaminoglycan sponge. Matrix 1992, 12(4):264-273.
59. Pins G., Christiansen D., Patel R., Silver F. Self-assembly of collagen fibers. Influence of fibrillar alignment and decorin on mechanical properties. Biophys. J. 1997, 73(4):2164-2172.
60. Khor E. Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses. Biomaterials 1997, 18(2):95-105.
61. Fan H., Liu H., Toh S.L., Goh J.C. Anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and silk scaffold in large animal model. Biomaterials 2009, 30(28):4967-4977.
62. Laschke M.W., Harder Y., Amon M., Martin I., Farhadi J., Ring A., et al. Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12(8):2093-2104.
63. Ghanaati S., Orth C., Unger R.E., Barbeck M., Webber M.J., Motta A., et al. Fine-tuning scaffolds for tissue regeneration: effects of formic acid processing on tissue reaction to silk fibroin. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2010, 4(6):464-472.
64. Wray L.S., Tsioris K., Gil E.S., Omenetto F.G., Kaplan D.L. Microfabricated porous silk scaffolds for vascularizing engineered tissues. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23(27):3404-3412.
65. Lovett M., Eng G., Kluge J.A., Cannizzaro C., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan D.L. Tubular silk scaffolds for small diameter vascular grafts. Organogenesis 2010, 6(4):217-224.
66. Schneider A., Wang X.Y., Kaplan D.L., Garlick J.A., Egles C. Biofunctionalized electrospun silk mats as a topical bioactive dressing for accelerated wound heating. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5(7):2570-2578.
67. Seib F.P., Herklotz M., Burke K.A., Maitz M.F., Werner C., Kaplan D.L. Multifunctional silk-heparin biomaterials for vascular tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2014, 35(1):83-91.
68. Yagi T., Sato M., Nakazawa Y., Tanaka K., Sata M., Itoh K., et al. Preparation of double-raschel knitted silk vascular grafts and evaluation of short-term function in a rat abdominal aorta. J. Artif. Organs 2011, 14(2):89-99.
69. Huang F., Sun L., Zheng J. In vitro and in vivo characterization of a silk fibroin-coated polyester vascular prosthesis. Artif. Organs 2008, 32(12):932-941.
70. Nakazawa Y., Sato M., Takahashi R., Aytemiz D., Takabayashi C., Tamura T., et al. Development of small-diameter vascular grafts based on silk fibroin fibers from Bombyx mori for vascular regeneration. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2011, 22(1-3):195-206.
71. Cattaneo I., Figliuzzi M., Azzollini N., Catto V., Fare S., Tanzi M.C., et al. In vivo regeneration of elastic lamina on fibroin biodegradable vascular scaffold. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2013, 36(3):166-174.
72. Fukayama T., Takagi K., Tanaka R., Hatakeyama Y., Aytemiz D., Suzuki Y., et al. Biological reaction to small-diameter vascular grafts made of silk fibroin implanted in the abdominal aortae of rats. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2015, 29(2):341-352.
73. Leong N.L., Petrigliano F.A., McAllister D.R. Current tissue engineering strategies in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2014, 102(5):1614-1624.
74. Fan H., Liu H., Wong E.J.W., Toh S.L., Goh J.C.H. In vivo study of anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and silk scaffold. Biomaterials 2008, 29(23):3324-3337.
75. Shen W., Chen X., Hu Y., Yin Z., Zhu T., Hu J., et al. Long-term effects of knitted silk-collagen sponge scaffold on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and osteoarthritis prevention. Biomaterials 2014, 35(28):8154-8163.
76. Seo Y., Yoon H., Song K., Kwon S., Lee H., Park Y., et al. Increase in cell migration and angiogenesis in a composite silk scaffold for tissue-engineered ligaments. J. Orthop. Res. 2009, 27(4):495-503.
77. Li X., He J., Bian W., Li Z., Li D., Snedeker J.G. A novel silk-TCP-PEEK construct for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an off-the shelf alternative to a bone-tendon-bone autograft. Biofabrication 2014, 6(1):015010.
78. Li X., He J., Bian W., Li Z., Zhang W., Li D., et al. A novel silk-based artificial ligament and tricalcium phosphate/polyether ether ketone anchor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - safety and efficacy in a porcine model. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10(8):3696-3704.
79. Shen W., Chen J., Yin Z., Chen X., Liu H., Heng B.C., et al. Allogenous tendon stem/progenitor cells in silk scaffold for functional shoulder repair. Cell Transpl. 2012, 21(5):943-958.
80. Shi P., Teh T.K.H., Toh S.L., Goh J.C.H. Variation of the effect of calcium phosphate enhancement of implanted silk fibroin ligament bone integration. Biomaterials 2013, 34(24):5947-5957.
81. Zhang W., Yang Y., Zhang K., Li Y., Fang G. Weft-knitted silk-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) mesh scaffold combined with collagen matrix and seeded with mesenchymal stem cells for rabbit Achilles tendon repair. Connect. Tissue Res. 2015, 56(1):25-34.
82. De Vita R., Buccheri E.M., Pozzi M., Zoccali G. Direct to implant breast reconstruction by using SERI (R), preliminary report. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 25(33):78.
83. McGuire K.P., Santillan A.A., Kaur P., Meade T., Parbhoo J., Mathias M., et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009, 16(10):2682-2690.
84. Maxwell G.P., Van Natta B., Bengtson B.P., Murphy D.K. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2015, 35(2):145-155.
85. Sugihara A., Sugiura K., Morita H., Ninagawa T., Tubouchi K., Tobe R., et al. Promotive effects of a silk film on epidermal recovery from full-thickness skin wounds. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 2000, 225(1):58-64.
86. Shan Y., Peng L., Liu X., Chen X., Xiong J., Gao J. Silk fibroin/gelatin electrospun nanofibrous dressing functionalized with astragaloside IV induces healing and anti-scar effects on burn wound. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 479(2):291-301.
87. Lan Y., Li W., Jiao Y., Guo R., Zhang Y., Xue W., et al. Therapeutic efficacy of antibiotic-loaded gelatin microsphere/silk fibroin scaffolds in infected full-thickness burns. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10(7):3167-3176.
88. Roh D., Kang S., Kim J., Kwon Y., Kweon H., Lee K., et al. Wound healing effect of silk fibroin/alginate-blended sponge in full thickness skin defect of rat. J. Mater Sci. Mater. Med. 2006, 17(6):547-552.
89. Okabayashi R., Nakamura M., Okabayashi T., Tanaka Y., Nagai A., Yamashita K. Efficacy of polarized hydroxyapatite and silk fibroin composite dressing gel on epidermal recovery from full-thickness skin wounds. J. Biomed. Mater Res. Part B 2009, 90B(2):641-646.
90. Lee J.H., Lee J.S., Kim D., Park C.H., Lee H.R. Clinical outcomes of silk patch in acute tympanic membrane perforation. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015, 8(2):117-122. 2015 Jun (Epub 2015 May 13).