Ten-year results from the natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 145-155

  Patrick Maxwell, G ^a,b   Van Natta, Bruce W ^c   Bengtson, Bradley P ^d   Murphy, Diane K ^e  

^a LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e ALLERGAN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; SILICONE GEL;

ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; DEVICE SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMPLANT CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; SEROMA; SILICONE BREAST IMPLANT; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BREAST IMPLANT; CLINICAL TRIAL; FOLLOW UP; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; TIME;

ADULT; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMPLANT CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SILICONE GELS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84941570541     PISSN: 1090820X     EISSN: 1527330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sju084     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jewell ML. Silicone gel breast implants at 50: the state of the science. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(8):1031-1034.
2. Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Maxwell GP; for the Style 410 U.S. Core Clinical Study Group. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120(7 Suppl 1):40S-48S.
3. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Bengtson BP. Natrelle Style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(6):709-717.
4. Gladfelter J, Murphy D. Breast augmentation motivations and satisfaction: a prospective study of more than 3, 000 silicone implantations. Plast Surg Nurs. 2008;28(4):170-174; quiz 175-176.
5. Maxwell GP, Hartley W. Breast augmentation. In: Mathes SJ, Hentz VR, eds. Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006:1-33.
6. Maxwell GP, Baker MR, Gabriel A. Augmentation mamma-plasty: general considerations. In: Spear SL, ed. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010:1227.
7. Barone FE, Perry L, Keller T, Maxwell GP. The biome-chanical and histopathologic effects of surface texturing with silicone and polyurethane in tissue implantation and expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(1):77-86.
8. Danino AM, Basmacioglu P, Saito S, et al. Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: a scanning electron microscopic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108 (7):2047-2052.
9. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117 (3):757-767; discussion 768-772.
10. Cunningham B. The Mentor Core Study on silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2007; 120(7 Suppl 1):19S-29S.
11. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):440-444.
12. Spear SL, Murphy DK; on behalf of the Allergan Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Core Clinical Study Group. Natrelle round silicone breast implants: core study results at 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1354-1361.
13. Hammond DC, Migliori MM, Caplin DA, Garcia ME, Phillips CA. Mentor Contour Profile Gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(6): 1381-1391.
14. Jacobson JM, Gatti ME, Schaffner AD, Hill LM, Spear SL. Effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(4): 456-462.
15. Henriksen TF, Fryzek JP, Hölmich LR, et al. Surgical intervention and capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a prospective study of risk factors. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(4):343-351.
16. Wiener TC. Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(2):303-306.
17. Blount AL, Martin MD, Lineberry KD, Kettaneh N, Alfonso DR. Capsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(4):516-521.
18. Adams WP Jr, Mallucci P. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(4):597e-611e.
19. Maxwell GP, Falcone PA. Eighty-four consecutive breast reconstructions using a textured silicone tissue expander. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(6):1022-1034; discussion 1035-1036.
20. Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(3):768-779; discussion 780-781.
21. Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(9):1165-1172.
22. Asplund O, Gylbert L, Jurell G, Ward C. Textured or smooth implants for submuscular breast augmentation: a controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(6):1200-1206.
23. Barnsley GP, Sigurdson LJ, Barnsley SE. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117(7):2182-2190.
24. Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C. Capsular contrac-ture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(5):1224-1236.
25. Hakelius L, Ohlsén L. Tendency to capsular contracture around smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants: a five-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100(6):1566-1569.
26. Spear SL, Elmaraghy M, Hess C. Textured-surface saline-filled silicone breast implants for augmentation mamma-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(4):1542-1552; discussion 1553-1554.
27. Collis N, Coleman D, Foo IT, Sharpe DT. Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(4):786-791.
28. Burkhardt BR, Demas CP. The effect of Siltex texturing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsular contracture around saline inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(1):123-128; discussion 129-130.
29. Jewell ML, Jewell JL. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30 (1):51-65.
30. Hedén P, Bronz G, Elberg JJ, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):430-436; discussion 437-438.
31. Bengtson BP. The highly cohesive, Style 410 form-stable gel implant for primary breast augmentation. In: Spear SL, ed. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010:1346.
32. Schafer M, Adams WP Jr, Chase S. Detection of breast implant rotation using in-office high-resolution ultrasound [abstract 1846503]. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33 (Suppl):S31.
33. Harrison P. Ultrasound fast alternative to MRI for breast implant status. 2014. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/822918. Accessed May 19, 2014.
34. de Jong D, Vasmel WL, de Boer JP, et al. Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in women with breast implants. JAMA. 2008;300(17):2030-2035.
35. Miranda RN, Aladily TN, Prince HM, et al. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: long-term follow-up of 60 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(2):114-120.