Grades and rank: Impacts of non-financial incentives on test performance

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 115, Issue , 2015, Pages 161-196

  Jalava, Nina ^a   Joensen, Juanna Schrøter ^a   Pellas, Elin ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Effort; Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation; Performance incentives; Randomized experiment; Test taking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941316154     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alpert M., Raiffa H. A progress report on the training of probability assessors. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 1982, 294-305. Cambridge University Press. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (Eds.).
2. Andersen S., Ertac S., Gneezy U., List J.A., Maximiano S. Gender, competitiveness and socialization at a young age: evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2010.
3. Attali Y., Neeman Z., Schlosser A. Rise to the Challenge or Not Give a Damn: Differential Performance in High vs. Low Stakes Tests 2011, IZA Discussion Paper No 5693.
4. Azmat G., Iriberri N. The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. J. Public Econ. 2010, 94(7):435-452.
5. Baumert J., Demmrich A. Test motivation in the assessment of student skills: the effects of incentives on motivation and performance. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2001, 16(3):441-462.
6. Becker G.S. Human Capital and the Personal Distribution of Income: An Analytical Approach, Vol. 1. Woytinsky Lecture 1967, Institute of Public Administration, Ann Arbor, MI.
7. Becker W.E., Rosen S. The learning effect of assessment and evaluation in high school. Econ. Educ. Rev. 1992, 11(2):107-118.
8. Bertrand M., Pan J. The trouble with boys: Social influences and the gender gap in disruptive behavior. Am. Econ. J.: Appl. Econ. 2013, 5(1):32-64.
9. Besley T., Ghatak M. Status incentives. Am. Econ. Rev. 2008, 98(2):206-211.
10. Bettinger E., Slonim R. Patience among children. J. Public Econ. 2007, 91(1):343-363.
11. Bettinger E.P. Paying to learn: the effect of financial incentives on elementary school test scores. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2012, 94(3):686-698.
12. Betts J.R. The impact of educational standards on the level and distribution of earnings. Am. Econ. Rev. 1998, 266-275.
13. Betts J.R., Grogger J. The impact of grading standards on student achievement, educational attainment, and entry-level earnings. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2003, 22(4):343-352.
14. Booth A., Nolen P. Choosing to compete: how different are girls and boys?. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2012, 81(2):542-555.
15. Cameron A.C., Gelbach J.B., Miller D.L. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2008, 90(3):414-427.
16. Cameron A.C., Gelbach J.B., Miller D.L. Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 2011, 29(2).
17. Cárdenas J.-C., Dreber A., Von Essen E., Ranehill E. Gender differences in competitiveness and risk taking: comparing children in Colombia and Sweden. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2012, 83(1):11-23.
18. Chay K.Y., McEwan P.J., Urquiola M. The central role of noise in evaluating interventions that use test scores to rank schools. Am. Econ. Rev. 2005, 1237-1258.
19. Cooley C.H. Human Nature and the Social Order 1902, Schocken, New York.
20. Cornwell C., Mustard D.B., Van Parys J. Noncognitive skills and the gender disparities in test scores and teacher assessments: evidence from primary school. J. Hum. Resour. 2013, 48(1):236-264.
21. Costrell R.M. A simple model of educational standards. Am. Econ. Rev. 1994, 956-971.
22. Croson R., Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econ. Lit. 2009, 448-474.
23. Cunha F., Heckman J. The technology of skill formation. Am. Econ. Rev. 2007, 97(2):31-47.
24. Cunha F., Heckman J.J., Lochner L., Masterov D.V. Interpreting the evidence on life cycle skill formation. Handbook Econ. Educ. 2006, 1:697-812.
25. Deci E.L., Koestner R., Ryan R.M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125(6):627.
26. Delfgaauw J., Dur R., Sol J., Verbeke W. Tournament incentives in the field: gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econ. 2013, 31(2):305-326.
27. Dijkstra P., Kuyper H., van der Werf G., Buunk A.P., van der Zee Y.G. Social comparison in the classroom: a review. Rev. Educ. Res. 2008, 78(4):828-879.
28. Dreber A., Von Essen E., Ranehill E. Outrunning the gender gap - boys and girls compete equally. Exp. Econ. 2011, 14(4):567-582.
29. Duckworth A.L., Seligman M.E. Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. J. Educ. Psychol. 2006, 98(1):198.
30. Eisenkopf G. Paying for better test scores. Educ. Econ. 2011, 19(4):329-339.
31. Ellingsen T., Johannesson M. Paying respect. J Econ. Perspect. 2007, 21(4):135-150.
32. Facchinello L. The Impact of Grading on Academic Choices: Mechanisms and Social Implications 2014, Manuscript, Stockholm School of Economics.
33. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 1954, 7(2):117-140.
34. Figlio D.N., Lucas M.E. Do high grading standards affect student performance?. J. Public Econ. 2004, 88(9):1815-1834.
35. Figlio D.N., Winicki J. Food for thought: the effects of school accountability plans on school nutrition. J. Public Econ. 2005, 89(2):381-394.
36. Fortin N.M., Oreopoulos P., Phipps S. Leaving Boys Behind: Gender Disparities in High Academic Achievement 2013, NBER Working Paper (19331).
37. Fredriksson P., Öckert B., Oosterbeek H. Long-term effects of class size. Q. J. Econ. 2013, 128(1):249-285.
38. Fryer R.G. Financial incentives and student achievement: evidence from randomized trials. Q. J. Econ. 2011, 126(4):1755-1798.
39. Gneezy U., Leonard K.L., List J.A. Gender differences in competition: evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 2009, 77(5):1637-1664.
40. Gneezy U., Niederle M., Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: gender differences. Q. J. Econ. 2003, 118(3):1049-1074.
41. Gneezy U., Rustichini A. Gender and competition at a young age. Am. Econ. Rev. 2004, 94(2):377-381.
42. Hanushek E.A., Rivkin S.G. Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. Am. Econ. Rev. 2010, 100(2):267-271.
43. Jacob B.A. Where the boys aren't: non-cognitive skills, returns to school and the gender gap in higher education. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2002, 21(6):589-598.
44. Jacob B.A., Lefgren L., Sims D.P. The persistence of teacher-induced learning. J. Hum. Resour. 2010, 45(4):915-943.
45. Joensen J.S., Nielsen H.S. Math and gender: heterogeneity in causes and consequences of math. Econ. J. 2014, (forthcoming).
46. Josephs R.A., Markus H.R., Tafarodi R.W. Gender and self-esteem. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1992, 63(3):391.
47. Kane T.J., Staiger D.O. The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountability measures. J. Econ. Perspect. 2002, 16(4):91-114.
48. Koedel C., Betts J. Value added to what? How a ceiling in the testing instrument influences value-added estimation. Education 2010, 5(1):54-81.
49. Kosfeld M., Neckermann S. Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Am. Econ. J.: Microecon. 2011, 3(3):86-99.
50. Lavy V. Performance pay and teachers' effort, productivity, and grading ethics. Am. Econ. Rev. 2009, 99(5):1979-2011.
51. Lavy V. Gender differences in market competitiveness in a real workplace: evidence from performance-based pay tournaments among teachers. Econ. J. 2012.
52. Lazear E.P. Speeding, terrorism, and teaching to the test. Q. J. Econ. 2006, 1029-1061.
53. Lazear E.P., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Polit. Econ. 1981, 841-864.
54. Leuven E., Oosterbeek H., Sonnemans J., Van der Klaauw B. Incentives versus sorting in tournaments: evidence from a field experiment. J. Labor Econ. 2011, 29(3):637-658.
55. Levitt S.D., List J.A., Neckermann S., Sadoff S. The Behavioralist Goes to School: Leveraging Behavioral Economics to Improve Educational Performance 2012, NBER Working Paper (18165).
56. Moulton B.R. An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1990, 334-338.
57. Murphy R., Weinhardt F. Top of Class: The Importance of Ordinal Rank Position 2013, CEP Discussion Paper No 1241.
58. Neal D. The design of performance pay in education. Handbook Econ. Educ. 2011, 4:495-550.
59. Neal D., Schanzenbach D.W. Left behind by design: proficiency counts and test-based accountability. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2010, 92(2):263-283.
60. Niederle M., Vesterlund L. Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: the role of competition. J. Econ. Perspect. 2010, 24(2):129-144.
61. Oreopoulos P., Salvanes K.G. Priceless: the nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. J. Econ. Perspect. 2011, 25(1):159-184.
62. Rivkin S.G., Hanushek E.A., Kain J.F. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica 2005, 73(2):417-458.
63. Rogers W. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech. Bull. 1987, 3(13).
64. Rothstein J. Teacher quality in educational production: tracking, decay, and student achievement. Q. J. Econ. 2010, 125(1):175-214.
65. Schwalbe M.L., Staples C.L. Gender differences in sources of self-esteem. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1991, 158-168.
66. Sjögren A. Graded Children: Evidence of Longrun Consequences of School Grades from a Nationwide Reform 2010, Technical report, Working paper//IFAU-Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation.
67. Sutter M., Rützler D. Gender Differences in Competition Emerge Early in Life 2010, IZA Discussion Paper No. 5015.
68. Svenson O. Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 1981, 47(2):143-148.
69. Tran A., Zeckhauser R. Rank as an inherent incentive: evidence from a field experiment. J. Public Econ. 2012, 96(9):645-650.
70. Vygotsky L.L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes 1978, Harvard University Press.
71. Weiss Y., Fershtman C. Social status and economic performance: a survey. Eur. Econ. Rev. 1998, 42(3-5):801-820.
72. Wise S.L., DeMars C.E. Low examinee effort in low-stakes assessment: problems and potential solutions. Educ. Assess. 2005, 10(1):1-17.
73. Wooldridge J.M. Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. Am. Econ. Rev. 2003, 93(2):133-138.