Crowded growth leads to the spontaneous evolution of semistable coexistence in laboratory yeast populations

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 36, 2015, Pages 11306-11311

  Frenkel, Evgeni M ^a,b   McDonald, Michael J ^a   Van Dyken, J David ^c   Kosheleva, Katya ^a   Lang, Gregory I ^d   Desai, Michael M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Miami   (United States)

^d LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coexistence; Crowding; Experimental evolution; Fungal adherence

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; COMPETITION; EVOLUTION; FREQUENCY DEPENDENT SELECTION; FUNGUS GROWTH; GROWTH CURVE; GROWTH RATE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES COEXISTENCE; SURFACE AREA; ALGORITHM; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TIME LAPSE IMAGING;

ANTIFUNGAL AGENT; FLUCONAZOLE; MICONAZOLE;

ALGORITHMS; ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; FLUCONAZOLE; MICONAZOLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING;

EID: 84941242209     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1506184112     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Friesen ML, Saxer G, Travisano M, Doebeli M (2004) Experimental evidence for sympatric ecological diversification due to frequency-dependent competition in Escherichia coli. Evolution 58(2):245-260.
2. Blount ZD, Borland CZ, Lenski RE (2008) Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(23):7899-7906.
3. Craig MacLean R, Dickson A, Bell G (2005) Resource competition and adaptive radiation in a microbial microcosm. Ecol Lett 8(1):38-46.
4. Helling RB, Vargas CN, Adams J (1987) Evolution of Escherichia coli during growth in a constant environment. Genetics 116(3):349-358.
5. Rozen DE, Philippe N, Arjan de Visser J, Lenski RE, Schneider D (2009) Death and cannibalism in a seasonal environment facilitate bacterial coexistence. Ecol Lett 12(1):34-44.
6. Levin BR (1972) Coexistence of two asexual strains on a single resource. Science 175(4027):1272-1274.
7. Rosenzweig RF, Sharp RR, Treves DS, Adams J (1994) Microbial evolution in a simple unstructured environment: Genetic differentiation in Escherichia coli. Genetics 137(4):903-917.
8. Turner PE, Souza V, Lenski RE (1996) Tests of ecological mechanisms promoting the stable coexistence of two bacterial genotypes. Ecology 77(7):2119-2129.
9. Le Gac M, Plucain J, Hindré T, Lenski RE, Schneider D (2012) Ecological and evolutionary dynamics of coexisting lineages during a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(24):9487-9492.
10. Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95(882):137-145.
11. Hardin G (1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131(3409):1292-1297.
12. Grover J (1997) Resource Competition (Chapman & Hall, London).
13. Tilman D (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
14. Schluter D (2000) The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
15. Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31(1):343-366.
16. Armstrong RA, McGehee R (1976) Coexistence of species competing for shared resources. Theor Popul Biol 9(3):317-328.
17. MacLean RC (2005) Adaptive radiation in microbial microcosms. J Evol Biol 18(6):1376-1386.
18. Kassen R, Rainey PB (2004) The ecology and genetics of microbial diversity. Annu Rev Microbiol 58:207-231.
19. Larsen DH, Dimmick RL (1964) Attachment and growth of bacteria on surfaces of continuous-culture vessels. J Bacteriol 88(5):1380-1387.
20. Poltak SR, Cooper VS (2011) Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities. ISME J 5(3):369-378.
21. Rainey PB, Travisano M (1998) Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394(6688):69-72.
22. Koza A, Moshynets O, Otten W, Spiers AJ (2011) Environmental modification and niche construction: developing O2 gradients drive the evolution of the Wrinkly Spreader. ISME J 5(4):665-673.
23. Stewart FM, Levin BR (1973) Partitioning of resources and the outcome of interspecific competition: a model and some general considerations. Am Nat 107(954):171-198.
24. Vance RR (1985) The stable coexistence of two competitors for one resource. Am Nat 126(1):72-86.
25. De Leenheer P, Angeli D, Sontag ED (2006) Crowding effects promote coexistence in the chemostat. J Math Anal Appl 319(1):48-60.
26. Kim W, Racimo F, Schluter J, Levy SB, Foster KR (2014) Importance of positioning for microbial evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(16):E1639-E1647.
27. Xavier JB, Foster KR (2007) Cooperation and conflict in microbial biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(3):876-881.
28. Frenkel EM, Good BH, Desai MM (2014) The fates of mutant lineages and the distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations in laboratory budding yeast populations. Genetics 196(4):1217-1226.
29. Lang GI, Botstein D, Desai MM (2011) Genetic variation and the fate of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Genetics 188(3):647-661.
30. Segrè AV, Murray AW, Leu J-Y (2006) High-resolution mutation mapping reveals parallel experimental evolution in yeast. PLoS Biol 4(8):e256.
31. Brauer MJ, Christianson CM, Pai DA, Dunham MJ (2006) Mapping novel traits by array-assisted bulk segregant analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 173(3):1813-1816.
32. Holt RD (2001) Species coexistence. The Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 5:413-426.
33. Wei Y, et al. (2011) The population dynamics of bacteria in physically structured habitats and the adaptive virtue of random motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(10):4047-4052.
34. Korolev KS, et al. (2012) Selective sweeps in growing microbial colonies. Phys Biol 9(2):026008.
35. Habets MG, Czárán T, Hoekstra RF, de Visser JAG (2007) Spatial structure inhibits the rate of invasion of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Proc Biol Sci 274(1622):2139-2143.
36. Livingston G, et al. (2012) Competition-colonization dynamics in experimental bacterial metacommunities. Nat Commun 3:1234.
37. Verstrepen KJ, Reynolds TB, Fink GR (2004) Origins of variation in the fungal cell surface. Nat Rev Microbiol 2(7):533-540.
38. Gerstein AC, Lo DS, Otto SP (2012) Parallel genetic changes and nonparallel geneenvironment interactions characterize the evolution of drug resistance in yeast. Genetics 192(1):241-252.
39. Vandenbosch D, et al. (2013) Genomewide screening for genes involved in biofilm formation and miconazole susceptibility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 13(8):720-730.
40. Klotz SA, Drutz DJ, Zajic JE (1985) Factors governing adherence of Candida species to plastic surfaces. Infect Immun 50(1):97-101.
41. Hazen K, Hazen B (1987) A polystyrene microsphere assay for detecting surface hydrophobicity variations within Candida albicans populations. J Microbiol Methods 6(5):289-299.
42. Traverse CC, Mayo-Smith LM, Poltak SR, Cooper VS (2013) Tangled bank of experimentally evolved Burkholderia biofilms reflects selection during chronic infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(3):E250-E259.
43. Giaever G, et al. (2002) Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418(6896):387-391.