Competition-colonization dynamics in experimental bacterial metacommunities

Nature Communications

Volumn 3, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Livingston, George ^a,c   Matias, Miguel ^a   Calcagno, Vincent ^b   Barbera, Claire ^a   Combe, Marine ^a   Leibold, Mathew A ^c   Mouquet, Nicolas ^a  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; COLONIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; META-ANALYSIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BIODIVERSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS;

BACTERIA; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PSEUDOMONAS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS;

EID: 84871793201     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2239     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Levins, R. & Culver, D. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. PNAS 68, 1246-1248 (1971).
2. Hastings, A. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Popul. Biol. 18, 363-373 (1980).
3. Tilman, D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75, 2-16 (1994).
4. Calcagno, V., Mouquet, N., Jarne, P. & David, P. Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition-colonization trade-off is not dead. Ecol. Lett. 9, 897-907 (2006). (Pubitemid 44167962)
5. Mouquet, N., Hoopes, M. F. & Amarasekare, P. The world is patchy and heterogeneous! Trade-off and source-sink dynamics in competitive metacommunities. Metacommun. Spatial Dyn. Ecol. Commun. 237-262 (2005).
6. Amarasekare, P. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 6, 1109-1122 (2003). (Pubitemid 37537833)
7. Goldwasser, L., Cook, J. & Silverman, E. D. The effects of variability on metapopulation dynamics and rates of invasion. Ecology 75, 40-47 (1994).
8. Nee, S. & May, R. M. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37-40 (1992).
9. Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. & Nowak, M. A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65-66 (1994). (Pubitemid 24277463)
10. Cadotte, M. W. et al. On testing the competition-colonization trade-off in a multispecies assemblage. Amer. Nat. 168, 704-709 (2006). (Pubitemid 44737204)
11. Armstrong, R. A. Fugitive species: experiments with fungi and some theoretical considerations. Ecology 57, 953-963 (1976).
12. Limberger, R. & Wickham, S. A. Competition-colonization trade-offs in a ciliate model community. Oecologia 167, 723-732 (2011).
13. Hunt, J. J. & Bonsall, M. B. The effects of colonization, extinction and competition on co-existence in metacommunities. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 866-879 (2009).
14. Jakobsson, A. & Eriksson, O. Trade-offs between dispersal and competitive ability: a comparative study of wind-dispersed Asteraceae forbs. Evol. Ecol. 17, 233-246 (2003). (Pubitemid 37181758)
15. Amarasekare, P. Coexistence of competing parasitoids on a patchily distributed host: local vs. spatial mechanisms. Ecology 81, 1286-1296 (2000). (Pubitemid 30446165)
16. Turnbull, L. A., Rees, M. & Crawley, M. J. Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: a sowing experiment. J. Ecol. 87, 899-912 (1999). (Pubitemid 29523820)
17. Mouquet, N., Leadley, P., Mériguet, J. & Loreau, M. Immigration and local competition in herbaceous plant communities: a three-year seed-sowing experiment. Oikos 104, 77-90 (2004). (Pubitemid 38143323)
18. Yu, D. W. et al. Experimental demonstration of species coexistence enabled by dispersal limitation. J. Anim. Ecol. 73, 1102-1114 (2004). (Pubitemid 39471158)
19. Rainey, P. B. & Travisano, M. Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394, 69-72 (1998). (Pubitemid 28321802)
20. Kassen, R., Buckling, A., Bell, G. & Rainey, P. B. Diversity peaks at intermediate productivity in a laboratory microcosm. Nature 406, 508-512 (2000). (Pubitemid 30625733)
21. Buckling, A., Wills, M. A. & Colegrave, N. Adaptation limits diversification of experimental bacterial populations. Science 302, 2107 (2003).
22. Cohan, F. M. Sexual isolation and speciation in bacteria. Genetica 116, 359-370 (2002). (Pubitemid 36108180)
23. Lenski, R. E. & Hattingh, S. E. Coexistence of two competitors on one resource and one inhibitor: A chemostat model based on bacteria and antibiotics. J. Theor. Biol. 122, 83-93 (1986).
24. Turner, P. E., Souza, V. & Lenski, R. E. Tests of ecological mechanisms promoting the stable coexistence of two bacterial genotypes. Ecology 77, 2119-2129 (1996).
25. Dechesne, A., Or, D. & Smets, B. F. Limited diffusive fluxes of substrate facilitate coexistence of two competing bacterial strains. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 64, 1-8 (2008). (Pubitemid 351365098)
26. Jost, L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363-375 (2006). (Pubitemid 43781677)
27. Tilman, D. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 57, 189-214 (1987).
28. Power, M. E. et al. Challenges in the quest for key-stones. BioScience 46, 609-620 (1996).
29. Mouquet, N., Moore, J. L. & Loreau, M. Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecol. Lett. 5, 56-65 (2002). (Pubitemid 34140318)
30. Venail, P. A., Maclean, R. C., Meynard, C. N. & Mouquet, N. Dispersal scales up the biodiversity-productivity relationship in an experimental source-sink metacommunity. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 2339-2345 (2010).
31. Gamfeldt, L. & Hillebrand, H. Effects of total resources, resource ratios, and species richness on algal productivity and evenness at both metacommunity and local scales. PloS One 6, e21972 (2011).
32. Pfisterer, A. B. & Schmid, B. Diversity-dependent production can decrease the stability of ecosystem functioning. Nature 416, 84-86 (2002). (Pubitemid 34215404)
33. Balvanera, P. et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1146-1156 (2006). (Pubitemid 44403808)
34. Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91, 3-17 (2000).
35. Loreau, M. et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294, 804-808 (2001). (Pubitemid 33032089)
36. Hooper, D. U. et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 3-35 (2005). (Pubitemid 40301269)
37. Jousset, A., Schmid, B., Scheu, S. & Eisenhauer, N. Genotypic richness and dissimilarity opposingly affect ecosystem functioning. Ecol. Lett. 14, 537-545 (2011).
38. Cardinale, B. J., Ives, A. R. & Inchausti, P. Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference. Oikos 104, 437-450 (2004). (Pubitemid 38300454)
39. Hillebrand, H. & Matthiessen, B. Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1405-1419 (2009).
40. Tilman, D., Lehman, C. L. & Yin, C. Habitat destruction, dispersal, and deterministic extinction in competitive communities. Amer. Nat. 149, 407-435 (1997).
41. Vandermeer, J. & Carvajal, R. Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. Amer. Nat. 158, 211-220 (2001). (Pubitemid 32739510)
42. Debinski, D. M. & Holt, R. D. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv. Biol. 14, 342-355 (2000). (Pubitemid 30221248)
43. Staddon, P., Lindo, Z., Crittenden, P. D., Gilbert, F. & Gonzalez, A. Connectivity, non-random extinction and ecosystem function in experimental metacommunities. Ecol. Lett. 13, 543-552 (2010).
44. Salomon, Y., Connolly, S. R. & Bode, L. Effects of asymmetric dispersal on the coexistence of competing species. Ecol. Lett. 13, 432-441 (2010).
45. Suding, K. N. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes and failures along the science-practice divide. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 465-487 (2011).
46. Loreau, M., MOuquet, N. & Holt, R. D. Meta-ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology. Ecol. Lett. 6, 673-679 (2003). (Pubitemid 36941099)
47. Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O. E. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations. (Elsevier Amsterdam, 2004).
48. Leibold, M. et al. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7, 601-613 (2004). (Pubitemid 38847749)
49. Massol, F. et al. Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology. Ecol. Lett. 14, 313-323 (2011).
50. Logue, J. B., Mouquet, N., Peter, H. & Hillebrand, H. Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 482-491 (2011).
51. Jessup, C. M. et al. Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 189-197 (2004). (Pubitemid 38355798)
52. Cadotte, M. W., Drake, J. A. & Fukami, T. Constructing nature: laboratory models as necessary tools for investigating complex ecological communities. Popul. Dyn. Lab. Ecol. 37, 333-353 (2005).
53. Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. Vaccination and herd immunity to infectious diseases. Nature 318, 323-329 (1985). (Pubitemid 16198489)
54. May, R. M. & Nowak, M. A. Superinfection, metapopulation dynamics, and the evolution of diversity. J. Theor. Biol. 170, 95-114 (1994). (Pubitemid 24315681)
55. Venail, P. et al. Diversity and productivity peak at intermediate dispersal rate in evolving metacommunities. Nature 452, 210-214 (2008). (Pubitemid 351380237)
56. Bell, G. & Gonzalez, A. Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations experiencing environmental deterioration. Science 332, 1327-1330 (2011).
57. Jansen, V. & Mulder, G. Evolving biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2, 379-386 (1999). (Pubitemid 29534510)
58. Gosset, W. S. [Student] 'The Application of the 'Law of Error' to the Work of the Brewery'. Laboratory Report, Vol. 8, 3-6 (Arthur Guinness & Son, Ltd., 1904).
59. Poisot, T., Lepennetier, G., Martinez, E., Ramsayer, J. & Hochberg, M. E. Resource availability affects the structure of a natural bacteria-bacteriophage community. Biol. Lett. 7, 201-204 (2011).
60. Oksanen, J et al. (2011vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-1http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.