Re-training automatic action tendencies to approach cigarettes among adolescent smokers: A pilot study

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 425-432

  Kong, Grace ^a   Larsen, Helle ^b   Cavallo, Dana A ^a   Becker, Daniela ^b   Cousijn, Janna ^b   Salemink, Elske ^b   Collot Descury Koenigs, Annemat L ^b   Morean, Meghan E ^a   Wiers, Reinout W ^b   Krishnan Sarin, Suchitra ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Approach avoidance task; Attentional bias; Cognitive bias modification; Intervention; Smoking

Indexed keywords

COTININE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT SMOKING; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PILOT STUDY; SELF CONCEPT; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM; SMOKING HABIT; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; COGNITIVE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 84941034168     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: 10979891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1049492     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012.
2. Available at: http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/policy/country-profile/nld.pdf?ua=1.
3. Johnston LD, OMalley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national results on drug use: 1975-2013: overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2014.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. High school students who tried to quit smoking cigarettes-United States, 2007. MMWR 2009; 58: 428-431.
5. Backinger CL, Leischow SJ. Advancing the science of adolescent tobacco use cessation. Am J Health Behav 2001; 25: 183-190.
6. Grimshaw G, Stanton A. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 18: CD003289.
7. Stacy AW, Wiers RW. Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psycho 2010; 6: 551-575.
8. Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ, Grenard J, et al. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behavior in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007; 86: 263-283.
9. Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2004; 8: 220-247.
10. Grenard JL, Ames SL, Wiers RW, Thush C, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Working memory moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations. Psychol Addict Behav 2008; 22: 426-432.
11. Peeters M, Wiers RW, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot R, Janssen T, Vollebergh WAM. Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. Addiction 2012; 107: 1939-1946.
12. Peeters M, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot RAGJ, Janssen T, Vollebergh WAM, Wiers RW. Automatic processes and the drinking behavior in early adolescence: a prospective study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013; 37: 1737-1744.
13. Thush C, Wiers RW, Ames SL, Grenard JL, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 94: 116-124.
14. Krank MD, Goldstein AL. Adolescent changes in implicit cognitions and prevention of substance abuse. In: Weirs RW, Stacy AW., editors. Handbook Implicit Cognition and Addiction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 439-453.
15. Rooke SE, Hine DW. A dual process account of adolescent and adult binge drinking. Addict Behav 2011; 36: 341-346.
16. Sherman SJ, Chassin L, Presson C, Seo D, Macy JT. The intergenerational transmission of implicit and explicit attitudes toward smoking: predicting adolescent smoking initiation. J Exp Soc Psychol 2009; 45: 313-319.
17. Mogg K, Bradley BP, Field M, De Houwer J. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction 2003; 98: 825-836.
18. Bradley BP, Mogg K, Wright T, Field M. Attentional bias in drug dependence: vigilance for cigarette-related cues in smokers. Psychol Addict Behav 2003; 17: 66-72.
19. Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Bromwell MA, Lankford ME, Monterosso JR, OBrien CP. Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 67: 185-191.
20. Wiers CE, Kühn S, Javadi AH, Korucuoglu O, Wiers RW, Walter H, Gallinat J, Bermpohl F. Automatic approach bias towards smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Pyschopharmacology 2013; 229: 187-197.
21. Watson P, de Wit S, Cousijn J, Hommel B, Wiers RW. Motivational mechanisms underlying the approach bias to cigarettes. J Exp Soc Psychopathol 2013; 4: 250-262.
22. Huijding J, de Jong PJ. Automatic associations with the sensory aspects of smoking: positive in habitual smokers but negative in non-smokers. Addict Behav 2006; 31: 182-186.
23. Waters A, Carter B, Robinson J, Wetter D, Lam C, Cinciripini P. Implicit attitudes to smoking are associated with craving and dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 91: 178-186.
24. Payne BK, McClernon FJ, Dobbins IG. Automatic affective responses to smoking cues. Exp Clin Psychopharm 2007; 15: 400-409.
25. Chassin L, Presson CC, Sherman SJ, Seo DC, Macy JT. Implicit and explicit attitudes predict smoking cessation: moderating effects of experienced failure to control smoking and plans to quit. Psychol Addict Behav 2010; 24: 670-679.
26. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, van den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav 2009; 8: 101-106.
27. Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Wiers RW. Reaching out toward cannabis: apporach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannais use. Addiction 2011; 106: 1667-1674.
28. Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci 2013; 4: 38-51.
29. Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci 2011; 22: 490-497.
30. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F. Re-training automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers addiction. Addiction 2010; 105: 279-287.
31. Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, Salemink E, Ridderinkhof KR. Cognitive bias modifcations and cognitive control training in addition and related psychopathology: mechanisms, clinical perspecties, and ways forward. Clin Pyschol Sci 2013; 1: 192-212.
32. Wittekind CE, Feist A, Viertel B, Moritz S, Fritzsche A. The Approach-Avoidance Task as an online intervention in cigarette smoking: a pilot study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiat 2015; 46: 115-120.
33. US Department of Health and Human Services (US HHS). Tobacco use and dependence guideline panel, treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 Update. Rockville, MD: US HHS; 2008.
34. Baert S, Koster EHW, De Raedt R. Modification of information-processing biases in emotional disorders: clinical relevant developments in experimental psychopathology. Int J Cogn Ther 2011; 4: 208-222.
35. Sobell LC, Toneatto T, Sobell MB, Leo GI, Johnson L. Alcohol abusers perceptions of the accuracy of their self-reports of drinking: implications for treatment. Addict Behav 1992; 17: 507-511.
36. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom K-O. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Brit J Addict 1991; 86: 1119-1127.
37. Larsen H, Kong G, Becker D, Cousijn J, Boendermaker W, Cavallo D, Krishnan-Sarin S. Implicit motivational processes underlying smoking in American and Dutch adolescents. Front Psychiatry 2014; 5: 1-9.
38. Cavallo DA, Cooney JL, Duhig AM, Smith AE, Liss TB, McFetridge AK, Babuscio T, et al. Combining cognitive behavioral therapy with contingency management for smoking cessation in adolescent smokers: a preliminary comparison of two different CBT formats. Am J Addict 2007; 16: 468-474.
39. Krishnan-Sarin S, Duhig AM, McKee SA, McMahon TJ, Liss T, McFetridge A, Cavallo DA. Contingency management for smoking cessation in adolescent smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharm 2006; 14: 306-310.
40. Krishnan-Sarin S, Cavallo DA, Cooney JL, Schepis TS, Kong G, Liss TB, Liss AK, et al. An exploratory randomized controlled trial of a novel high-school-based smoking cessation intervention for adolescent smokers using abstinence-contingent incentives and cognitive behavioral therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013; 132: 346-351.
41. SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 2002; 4: 149-159.
42. Sherman SJ, Rose JS, Koch K, Presson CC, Chassin L. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward cigarette smoking: the effects of context and motivation. J Soc Clin Psycho 2003; 22: 13-39.
43. Mitchell JP, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. J Exp Psychol Gen 2003; 132: 455-469.
44. Roefs A, Quaedackers L, Werrij MQ, Wolters G, Havermans R, Nederkoorn C, van Breukelen G, et al. The environment influences whether high-fat foods are associated with palatable or with unhealthy. Behav Res Ther 2006; 44: 715-736.
45. Kobus K. Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction 2003; 98: 37-55.
46. Weinstein SM, Mermelstein RJ. Dynamic associations of negative mood and smoking across the development of smoking in adolescence. J Clin Child Adol Psychol 2013; 42: 629-642.
47. Kersbergen I, Woud ML, Field M. The validity of different measures of automatic alcohol action tendencies. Psychol Addict Behav 2015; 29: 225-230.
48. Brown HM, Eley TC, Broeren S, MacLeod C, Rinck M, Hadwin JA, Lester KJ. Psychometric properties of reaction time based experimental paradigms measuring anxiety-related information-processing biases in children. J Anxiety Dis 2014; 28: 97-107.
49. Ataya AF, Adams S, Mullings E, Cooper RM, Attwood AS, Munafo MR. Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias. Drug Alcohol Depen 2012; 121: 148-151.
50. Cousijn J, Luijten M, Wiers RW. Mechanisms underlying alcohol-approach action tendencies: the role of emotional primes and drinking motives. Front Psychiatry 2014; 5: 44.
51. Sussman S. Effects of sixty six adolescent tobacco use cessation trials and seventeen prospective studies of self-initiated quitting. Tob Induc Dis 2002; 1: 35-81.
52. Sussman S, Sun P, Dent CW. A meta-analysis of teen cigarette smoking cessation. Health Psychology 2006; 25: 549-557.
53. Sussman S, Sun P. Youth tobacco use cessation: 2008 update. Tob Induc Dis 2009; 5: 1-11.
54. Krishnan-Sarin S, Reynolds B, Duhig AM, Smith AE, Liss T, McFetridge A, Cavallo DA, et al. Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 88: 79-82.
55. Salemink E, Wiers RW. Adolescent threat-related interpretive bias and its modification: the moderating role of regulatory control. Behav Res Ther 2012; 50: 40-46.
56. McDonald P, Colwell B, Backinger CL, Husten C, Maule CO. Better practices for youth tobacco cessation: evidence of review panel. Am J Health Behav 2003; 27: S144-158.
57. Milton M, Maule CO, Backinger CL, Gregory DM. Recommendations and guidance for practice in youth tobacco cessation. Am J Health Behav 2003; 27: S159-169.
58. Fadardi JS, Cox WM. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 101: 137-145.
59. Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Implementation of approach bias re-training in alcoholism-how many sessions are needed? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2014; 38: 587-594