Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 136, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 10-20

  Selber, Jesse C ^a   Wren, James H ^a   Garvey, Patrick B ^a   Zhang, Hong ^a   Erickson, Cameron ^a   Clemens, Mark W ^a   Butler, Charles E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; BOVINE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DEVICE REMOVAL; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; ADULT; ANIMALS; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CATTLE; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84940930428     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001327     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Slavin SA, Lin SJ. The use of acellular dermal matrices in revisional breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):70S-85S.
2. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Use of the acellular dermal matrix in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:485-493.
3. Basu CB, Jeffers L. The role of acellular dermal matrices in capsular contracture: A review of the evidence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):118S-124S.
4. Bengtson B. Acellular dermal matrices in secondary aesthetic breast surgery: Indications, techniques, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):142S-156S.
5. Kim JYS, Connor CM. Focus on technique: Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):104S-115S.
6. Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1162-1169.
7. Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:346-356.
8. Israeli R. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):159S-172S.
9. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429-436.
10. Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:28-41.
11. Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S. Current trends in breast reconstruction: Survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010. Ann Plastic Surg. 2013;70:103-110.
12. Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1049-1058.
13. Parks JW, Hammond SE, Walsh WA, Adams RL, Chandler RG, Luce EA. Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:739-746.
14. Pannucci CJ, Antony AK, Wilkins EG. The impact of acellular dermal matrix on tissue expander/implant loss in breast reconstruction: An analysis of the tracking outcomes and operations in plastic surgery database. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1-10.
15. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: Determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1606-1614.
16. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, et al. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1755-1762.
17. Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, et al. Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:202-210.
18. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: An outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1886-1892.
19. Davies K, Allan L, Roblin P, Ross D, Farhadi J. Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast 2011;20:21-25.
20. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:674-678.
21. Mlodinow AS, Fine NA, Khavanin N, Kim JY. Risk factors for mastectomy flap necrosis following immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014;48:322-326.
22. World Health Organization. Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 854. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995.
23. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation, WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
24. World Health Organization. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-163.
25. McCunn D. Bra underwire charts. Design Enterprises of San Francisco. Available at: http://deofsf.com/Resources/Bra-Underwire-Charts.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2014.
26. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer treatment (PDQ): Stage information for breast cancer. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/Patient/page1/. Accessed June 26, 2014.
27. Hultman SC, Daiza S. Skin-sparing mastectomy flap complications after breast reconstruction: Review of incidence, management, and outcome. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:249-255.
28. Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, Henry-Tillman RS, Westbrook K, Klimberg VS. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:920-926.
29. Woerdeman LA, Hage JJ, Hofland MM, Rutgers EJ. A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:455-463.
30. Meretoja TJ, von Smitten KA, Kuokkanen HO, Suominen SH, Jahkola TA. Complications of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective randomized study comparing high-frequency radiosurgery with conventional diathermy. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:24-28.
31. Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: Complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26-32.
32. Rao R, Saint-Cyr M, Ma AM, et al. Prediction of postoperative necrosis after mastectomy: A pilot study utilizing optical diffusion imaging spectroscopy. World J Surg Oncol. 2009;7:91.
33. Newman MI, Samson MC, Tamburrino JF, Swartz KA. Intraoperative laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography for the evaluation of mastectomy flaps in immediate breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010;26:487-492.
34. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: Indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1170-1178.
35. Komorowska-Timek E, Gurtner GC. Intraoperative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging can predict and prevent complications in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1065-1073.
36. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429-436.
37. Newman MI, Swartz KA, Samson MC, Mahoney CB, Diab K. The true incidence of near-term postoperative complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction utilizing human acellular dermal matrices: A meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:100-106.
38. Garvey PB, Villa MT, Rozanski AT, Liu J, Robb GL, Beahm EK. The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:991-1000.
39. Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JY. An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: Indications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:178-188.