A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 346-356

  Ho, Goretti ^a   Nguyen, T Joanna ^a   Shahabi, Ahva ^a   Hwang, Brian H ^a   Chan, Linda S ^a   Wong, Alex K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

acellular dermal matrix; Breast reconstruction; meta analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTIFICIAL SKIN; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CELLULITIS; CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; GRAFT REJECTION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEROMA; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SURGICAL INFECTION; TISSUE EXPANSION; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST IMPLANTS; CELLULITIS; CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; GRAFT REJECTION; HEMATOMA; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEROMA; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TISSUE EXPANSION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84858818407     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823f3cd9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Report of the 2009 Statistics: 2009 Reconstructive Surgery Trends. 2010. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/ 2009-statistics/2009-US-cosmeticreconstructiveplasticsurgeryminimally- invasivestatistics. pdf.
2. Nguyen TJ, Carey JN, Wong AK. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant-based breast reconstruction: evaluating the evidence. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1553-1561.
3. Nguyen TJ, Carey JN, Wong AK. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant based breast reconstruction: evaluating the evidence. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011.
4. Alloderm. Available at: http://www.lifecell.com/alloderm-regenerative- tissue-matrix/.
5. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.
6. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-188.
7. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-560.
8. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.2. Updated September 2009. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/training/cochrane-handbook.
9. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629-634.
10. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
11. Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2000;19:3127-3131.
12. Baxter RA. Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1692-1696; discussion 1697-1698.
13. Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY, et al. The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:510-513.
14. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429-436.
15. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1606-1614.
16. Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1743-1753.
17. Nguyen MD, Chen C, Colakoǧlu S, et al. Infectious complications leading to explantation in implant-based breast reconstruction with AlloDerm. Eplasty. 2010;10:e48.
18. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:674-678.
19. Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:418-425.
20. Namnoum JD. Expander/implant reconstruction with AlloDerm: recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:387-394.
21. Becker S, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, et al. AlloDerm versus DermaMatrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a preliminary comparison of complication profiles and material compliance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123:1-6; discussion 107-108.
22. Topol BM, Dalton EF, Ponn T, et al. Immediate single-stage breast reconstruction using implants and human acellular dermal tissue matrix with adjustment of the lower pole of the breast to reduce unwanted lift. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:494-499.
23. Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:250-255.
24. Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E. Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:373-381.
25. Bindingnavele V, Gaon M, Ota KS, et al. Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:1214-1218.
26. Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:1-5.
27. Gamboa-Bobadilla GM. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:22-25.
28. Losken A. Early results using sterilized acellular human dermis (neoform) in post-mastectomy tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009.
29. Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232-239.
30. Tonseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, et al. Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1188-1194.
31. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1585-1595.
32. Sullivan SR, Fletcher DR, Isom CD, et al. True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:19-28.
33. Duncan DI. Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J. 2001;21:81-84.
34. Spear SL, Majidian A. Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants: a retrospective review of 171 consecutive breast reconstructions from 1989 to 1996. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:53-63.
35. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2265-2274.
36. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:825-831.
37. Losken A, Styblo TM, Schaefer TG, et al. The use of fluorescein dye as a predictor of mastectomy skin flap viability following autologous tissue reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:24-29.
38. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, et al. Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:467-476.
39. Wong AK, Schonmeyr B, Singh P, et al. Histologic analysis of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in acellular human dermis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1144-1152.
40. Sbitany H. Techniques to reduce seroma and infection in acellular dermisassisted prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126: 1121-2; author reply 1122.
41. Disa JJ, Ad-El DD, Cohen SM, et al. The premature removal of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1662-1665.
42. Francis SH, Ruberg RL, Stevenson KB, et al. Independent risk factors for infection in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1790-1796.
43. Armstrong RW, Berkowitz RL, Bolding F. Infection following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;23:284-288.
44. Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, AmalfiAN, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a headto-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1735-1740.
45. Spear SL, Seruya M, Clemens MW, et al. Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010.
46. Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1702-1709.
47. Ho G, Lee DJ. Long-term follow-up of capsular contracture rates in implantbased breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. 2011.
48. Stump A, Holton LH 3rd, Connor J, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:82-91.