Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 130, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 739-746

  Parks, Joseph W ^a   Hammond, Sarah E ^a   Walsh, William A ^a   Adams, Robert L ^a   Chandler, Robert G ^a   Luce, Edward A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLODERM; COLLAGEN;

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BODY MASS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT REJECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEROMA; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TISSUE EXPANDER; TISSUE EXPANSION; WOUND HEALING;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; COLLAGEN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT REJECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEROMA; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE EXPANSION; TISSUE EXPANSION DEVICES; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84867059943     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f06e     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. ASPS statistics 2010. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2010- statisticss/Overall-Trends/2010-reconstructive-trends-statistics-trends.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2011.
2. Namnoum JD. Expander/implant reconstruction with Allo-Derm: Recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:387-394.
3. Nguyen TJ, Carey JN, Wong AK. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant-based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;65:1553-1561.
4. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 429-436.
5. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: Determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Re-constr Surg. 2010;125:1606-1614.
6. Jensen LA, Macadam SA. The use of Allo Derm in postmas-tectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: Part I. A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2232-2244.
7. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. "The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. " Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:674-678.
8. Newman MI, Swartz KA, Samson MC, Mahoney CB, Diab K. The true incidenceofnear-term postoperative complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction utilizing human acellular dermal matrices: A meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2011;35: 100-106.
9. Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128:1162-1169.
10. Francis SH, Ruberg RL, Stevenson KB, et al. Independent risk factors for infection in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1790-1796.
11. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, et al. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1755-1762.
12. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: An outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1886-1892.
13. Nguyen MD, Chen C, Colakoglu S, Morris DJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Infectious complications leading to explantation in implant-based breast reconstruction with Allo Derm. Eplasty 2010;10:e48.
14. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128:403e-410e.
15. Newman MI, Hanabergh E, Samson MC. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation (letter). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1120-1121.
16. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, et al. Complications in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2265-2274.
17. Antony AK, Mehrara McCarthy CM. Salvage of tissue expander in the setting of mastectomy flap necrosis: A 13-year experience using timed excision with continued expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:356-363.
18. Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: A head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124:1735-1740.
19. Crosby MA, Dong W, Feng L, et al. Effect of intraoperative saline fill volume on perioperative outcomes in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1065-1072.
20. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: Part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:825-831.
21. Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1743-1753.
22. Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2001;49:713-721.