Current trends in breast reconstruction: Survey of american society of plastic surgeons 2010

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 103-110

  Gurunluoglu, Raffi ^a   Gurunluoglu, Aslin ^b   Williams, Susan A ^a   Tebockhorst, Seth ^a  

^a DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Education of Management   (United States)

Author keywords

acellular dermal matrix; ASPS; autologous breast reconstruction; breast reconstruction; implant breast reconstruction; mastectomy; microsurgical breast reconstruction; practice setting; radiation; survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; SURGICAL FLAPS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84871609274     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822ed5ce     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Noone RB. Thirty-five years of breast reconstruction: eleven lessons to share. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 1820.
2. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Janz NK, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27: 5325.
3. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, et al. Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction. Cancer. 2007;109: 1715.
4. Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R, et al. Patterns and correlates of postmas-tectomy breast reconstruction by U. S. plastic surgeons: results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127: 1796.
5. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Department of Public Relations 444 East Algonquin Road, Arlington Heights, IL. Available at: http://www. plasticsurgery.org/Documents/Media/2010-Statistics/ASPS[lowem2010] [lowem]Plastic[lowem]Surgery[lowem]Statistics[lowem]20711.pdf.
6. Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A. Do plastic surgeons have cosmetic surgery? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 2161.
7. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, et al. Estimating sample size and power: applications and examples. Designing Clinical Research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 65-93. Available at: http://books.google.com/books?id=[lowem]7UWxJ5erSsC&printsec= frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed June 25, 2011.
8. Sample size calculator. Creative Research Systems. Available at: http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. Accessed June 25, 2011.
9. Beahm EK, Walton RL. Issues, considerations, and trends in bilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 1064.
10. Spear SL, Carter ME, Schwarz K. Prophylactic mastectomy: indications, options, and reconstructive alternatives. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115: 891.
11. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 395.
12. Takei H, Kurosumi M, Yoshida T, et al. Current trends of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. A surgeon's perspective. Breast Cancer. 2007;14: 362.
13. Christante D, Pommier SJ, Diggs BS, et al. Using complications associated with postmastectomy radiation and immediate breast reconstruction to improve surgical decision making. Arch Surg. 2010;145: 873.
14. Klauber-DeMore N, Calvo BF, Hultman CS, et al. Staged sentinel lymph node biopsy before mastectomy facilitates surgical planning for breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2005;190: 595.
15. Schrenk P, Woelfl S, Bogner S, et al. The use of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients undergoing skin sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116: 1278.
16. Wood BC, David LR, Defranzo AJ, et al. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Am Surg. 2009;75: 551.
17. Wood BC, Levine EA, Marks MW, et al. Outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction in patients undergoing single-stage sentinel lymph node biopsy and mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66: 564-567.
18. Fine NA, Hirsch EM. Keeping options open for patients with anticipated postmastectomy chest wall irradiation: immediate tissue expansion followed by reconstruction of choice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;123: 25.
19. Kronowitz SJ. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction: technical and timing considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 463.
20. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Department of Public Relations 444 East Algonquin Road, Arlington Heights, IL. Available at: http://www. plasticsurgery.org/Documents/Media/statistics/2009-reconstructive-trends- statistics.pdf.
21. Stump A, Holton J, Connor LH, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 82.
22. Komorowska-Timek E, Oberg KC, Timek TA, et al. The effect of Alloderm envelopes on periprosthetic capsule formation with and without radiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123: 807.
23. Spear SL. Discussion: acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 1741.
24. Nahabedian MY. Breast reconstruction: a review and rationale for patient selection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 55.
25. Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 1735.
26. Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2008;32: 418.
27. Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS, et al. Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123: 408.
28. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118: 825.
29. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118: 832.
30. Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, et al. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: 877.
31. Saulis AS, Mustoe TA, Fine NA. A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119: 1669; discussion 1677.
32. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 769.
33. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 1585; discussion 1596-1598.
34. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 1.
35. Visser NJ, Damen THC, Timman R, et al. Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126: 26-36.
36. Gurunluoglu R, Shafighi M, Schwabegger A, et al. Secondary breast reconstruction with deepithelialized free flaps from the lower abdomen for intractable capsular contracture and maintenance of breast volume. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005;21: 35.
37. Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP. Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119: 775.
38. Serra-Renom JM, Muñoz-Olmo JL, Serra-Mestre JM. Fat grafting in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction with expanders and prostheses in patients who have received radiotherapy: formation of new subcutaneous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 12.
39. Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J III, et al. Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115: 257.
40. Huang JJ, Wu CW, Lam WL, et al. Simultaneous contralateral breast reduction/mastopexy with unilateral breast reconstruction using free abdominal flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67: 336-342.
41. Wan DC, Tseng CY, Anderson-Dam J, et al. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and MS-TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126: 367.
42. Selber JC, Serletti JM. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: myth and reality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 50.
43. Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. Unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1142.
44. Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10 year retrospective reviewof 758 DIEAP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113: 1153.
45. Baumann DP, Lin HY, Chevray PM. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 1335.
46. Wong C, Saint-Cyr M, Mojallal A, et al. Perforasomes of the DIEP flap: vascular anatomy of the lateral versus medial row perforators and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 772.
47. Bailey SH, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, et al. The single dominant medial row perforator DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: three-dimensional perforasome and clinical results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126: 739.
48. Wong C, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, et al. Three-and four-dimensional computed tomography angiographic studies of commonly used abdominal flaps in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 18.
49. Massey MF, Spiegel AJ, Levine JL, et al. Perforator flaps: recent experience, current trends, and future directions based on 3974 microsurgical breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 737.
50. Durkin AJ, Pierpont YN, Patel S, et al. An algorithmic approach to breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 1318.
51. Disa JJ, McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, et al. Postmastectomy reconstruction: an approach to patient selection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 43.
52. BuckDW, FineNA.The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 1047.
53. Hammond DC. Latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 1055.
54. LoTempio MM, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126: 393.
55. Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, et al. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three step principle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123: 455.
56. Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, et al. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three step principle. Part IIVbreast reconstruction after total mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123: 794.
57. Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, et al. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three step principle. Part IIIV reconstruction following breast conservative treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124: 28.
58. Roostaeian J, Pavone L, Da Lio A, et al. Immediate placement of implants in breast reconstruction: patient selection and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127: 1407.
59. Nahabedian M, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115: 436; discussion 445.
60. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, et al. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110: 466; discussion 476.
61. Nahabedian MY. Discussion. A comparison between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126: 1436.
62. Phillips BT, Wang ED, Mirrer J, et al. Current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis and closed-suction drains in breast reconstruction among plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg. 2011.