The impact of acellular dermal matrix on tissue expander/implant loss in breast reconstruction: An analysis of the tracking outcomes and operations in plastic surgery database

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-10

  Pannucci, Christopher J ^a,b   Antony, Anuja K ^b   Wilkins, Edwin G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b not available   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PLASTIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS; TIME; TISSUE EXPANDER; UNITED STATES;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMAPLASTY; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGERY, PLASTIC; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE EXPANSION DEVICES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84879992992     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f917     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2011 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org. Accessed October 21, 2012.
2. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:674-678.
3. Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: A head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1735-1740.
4. Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1162-1169.
5. Parks JW, Hammond SE, Walsh WA, Adams RL, Chandler RG, Luce EA. Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:739-746.
6. Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A. Focus on technique: Supporting the soft-tissue envelope in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):89S-94S.
7. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:403e-410e.
8. Collis GN, TerKonda SP, Waldorf JC, Perdikis G. Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: Are there substantial benefits? Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:425-428.
9. McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: A multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):57S-66S.
10. JoAnna Nguyen T, Carey JN, Wong AK. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant-based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1553-1561.
11. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429-436.
12. Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:346-356.
13. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: Determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1606-1614.
14. Brooke S, Mesa J, Uluer M, et al. Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: A comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acellular inferior pole dermal slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:347-349.
15. Adetayo OA, Salcedo SE, Bahjri K, Gupta SC. A meta-analysis of outcomes using acellular dermal matrix in breast and abdominal wall reconstructions: Event rates and risk factors predictive of complications. Ann Plast Surg. (in press).
16. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Fiscal year 2012 TOPS demographic data. October 21, 2012.
17. Janevicius R. CPT corner: New biologic implant codes cause some confusion. Available at: http://www.psnextra.org/Columns/CPT-Corner-Sept-2012. html. Accessed October 30, 2012.
18. Abraham M, Ahlman JT, Boudreau AJ, Connelly JL. Current Procedural Terminology, 2011 Professional Edition. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2010.
19. Stump A, Holton LH III, Connor J, Harper JR, Slezak S, Silverman RP. The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:82-91.
20. Basu CB, Jeffers L. The role of acellular dermal matrices in capsular contracture: A review of the evidence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):118S-124S.
21. Januszyk M, Gurtner GC. Statistics in medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:437-444.
22. Mirzabeigi MN, Lee M, Smartt JM Jr, Jandali S, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM. Extended trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for implant reconstruction in the previously irradiated chest wall. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:37e-45e.