Cinematic climate change, a promising perspective on climate change communication

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 827-841

  Sakellari, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

cinema; climate change communication; popular culture

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROCEDURES; SCIENCE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MOTION PICTURES AS TOPIC; SCIENCE;

EID: 84940859905     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662514537028     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. I.Ajzen (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2. I.AjzenT.C.BrownL.H.Rosenthal (1996) Information bias in contingent valuation: Effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management30(1): 43–58.
3. A.AlaszewskiP.Brown (2007) Risk, uncertainty and knowledge. Health Risk & Society9(1): 1–10.
4. N.AllumP.SturgisD.TabouraziI.Brunton-Smith (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science17: 35–54.
5. A.C.AndrewsR.A.ClawsonB.M.GramigL.Raymond (2013) Why do farmers adopt conservation tillage? An experimental investigation of framing effects. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation68(6): 501–511.
6. M.AppelT.Richter (2007) Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology10(1): 113–134.
7. J.AumontA.BergalaM.MarieM.Vernet (1992) Aesthetics of Film (trans. R.Neupert). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
8. T.E.BackerE.M.RogersP.Sopory (1992) Designing Health Communication Campaigns: What Works?Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
9. C.M.Bahk (2011) Environmental education through narrative films: Impact of medicine man on attitudes toward forest preservation. Journal of Environmental Education42(1): 1–13.
10. S.Ball-RokeachM.RokeachJ.Grube (1984) The Great American Values Test: Influencing Behavior and Belief Through Television. New York: Free Press.
11. A.BalmfordA.ManicaL.AireyL.BirkinA.OliverJ.Schleicher (2004) Hollywood, climate change and the public. Science305(5691): 1713.
12. A.Bandura (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. B.Barnes (2000) Understanding Agency: Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: SAGE.
14. G.BeattieL.SaleL.McGuire (2011) An inconvenient truth? Can a film really affect psychological mood and our explicit attitudes towards climate change?Semiotica187: 105–125.
15. J.C.BesleyJ.Shanahan (2005) Media attention and exposure in relation to support for agricultural biotechnology. Science Communication26(4): 347–367.
16. J.Blewitt (2011) Critical practice and the public pedagogy of environmental and conservation media. Environmental Education Research17(6): 719–734.
17. M.T.BoykoffJ.M.Boykoff (2004) Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Global Environmental Change14: 125–136.
18. R.J.Brulle (2010) From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture4(1): 82–98.
19. R.Bryant (2009a) Peering into the abyss: Environment, research and absurdity in the ‘Age of Stupid’. Environment, Politics and Development Working Paper Series, Paper 19, Department of Geography, King’s College London. Available at: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/sspp/geography/research/epd/working.html
20. R.Bryant (2009b) Reviews. Public Policy Research16: 64–67.
21. N.Chomsky (2002) Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda, 2nd edn.New York: Seven Stories Press.
22. R.Cox (2012) Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere, 3rd edn.USA: SAGE.
23. D.C.Dennett (1987) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24. H.DoultonK.Brown (2009) Ten years to prevent catastrophe? Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change19: 191–202.
25. A.DudoD.BrossardJ.ShanahanD.A.ScheufeleM.MorganN.Signorielli (2011) Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research38(6): 754–777.
26. S.DunwoodyB.BrossardA.Dudo (2009) Socialization of rewards? Predicting U.S. scientist-media interactions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly86(2): 299–314.
27. F.Elkamel (1995) The use of television series in health education. Health Education Research10: 225–232.
28. S.FarnsworthS.R.Lichter (2012) Scientific assessments of climate change information in news and entertainment media. Science Communication34(4): 435–459.
29. S.Fuchs (2001) Beyond agency. Sociological Theory19(1): 24–40.
30. W.A.GamsonA.Modigliani (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95: 1–37.
31. N.T.GavinT.Marshall (2011) Mediated climate change in Britain: Scepticism on the web and on television around Copenhagen. Global Environmental Change21(3): 1035–1044.
32. R.J.Gerrig (1993) Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. J.E.Good (2008) The framing of climate change in Canadian, American, and international newspapers: A media propaganda model analysis. Canadian Journal of Communication33(2): 233–255.
34. B.GrayJ.Stites (2011) In search of integrative logics: Reframing the climate change debate. Strategic Organization9(1): 85–90.
35. M.C.GreenT.C.Brock (2002) In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In: M.C.GreenJ.J.StrangeT.C.Brock (eds) Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 315–342.
36. T.Greitemeyer (2013) Beware of climate change skeptic films. Journal of Environmental Psychology35: 105–109.
37. S.Hall (1980) Encoding/decoding. In: H.StuartD.HobsonA.LoweP.Willis (eds) Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson, pp. 128–138.
38. P.S.HartL.Feldman (2014) Threat without efficacy? Climate change on U.S. network news. Science Communication36(2): 1–27.
39. P.S.HartA.A.Leiserowitz (2009) Finding the teachable moment: An analysis of information seeking behavior on global warming related websites during the release of The Day After Tomorrow. Environmental Communication3(3): 355–366.
40. A.D.Henry (2000) Public perceptions of global warming. Human Ecology Review7(1): 25–30.
41. J.HinesH.HungerfordA.Tomera (1987) Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education18(2): 1–8.
42. D.HodgettsB.BolamC.Stephens (2005) Mediation and the construction of contemporary understandings of health and lifestyle. Journal of Health Psychology10(1): 123–136.
43. D.HodgettsK.ChamberlainG.Bassett (2003) Between television and the audience: Renegotiating representations of aging. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine7: 251–272.
44. A.Hoffman (2011) The culture and discourse of climate skepticism. Strategic Organization9(1): 77–84.
45. S.Holden (2009) An alarm from 2055: Act now to save the earth. Available at: http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/movies/17age.html
46. R.A.Howell (2011) Lights, camera … action? Altered attitudes and behaviour in response to the climate change film The Age of Stupid. Global Environmental Change21(1): 177–187.
47. R.A.Howell (2012) Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior46(1): 70–101.
48. M.Hulme (2008) The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and their dissolution. The Geographical Journal174(1): 5–16.
49. H.HungerfordT.Volk (1990) Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education21: 8–21.
50. G.D.Jacobsen (2011) The Al Gore effect: An inconvenient truth and voluntary carbon offsets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management61(1): 67–78.
51. D.M.KahanH.Jenkins-SmithD.Braman (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research14(2): 147–174.
52. W.J.Kinsella (2008) Narratives, rhetorical genres, and environmental conflict: Responses to Schwarze’s “Environmental Melodrama” (Special section). Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture2: 78–109.
53. D.Kirby (2003) Scientists on the set: Science consultants and communication of science in visual fiction. Public Understanding of Science12(3): 261–278.
54. D.Kirby (2011) Lab Coats in Hollywood: Science, Scientists and Cinema. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
55. J.Kitzinger (2004) Audience and readership research. In: J.DowningD.McQuailP.SchlesingerE.Wartella (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Media Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 167–181.
56. J.Kitzinger (2010) Questioning the sci-fi alibi: A critique of how “science fiction fears” are used to explain away public concerns about risk. Journal of Risk Research13(1): 73–86.
57. A.Leiserowitz (2004) Before and after the day after tomorrow: A U.S. study of climate change risk perception. Environment46(9): 22–37.
58. A.LeiserowitzE.MaibachC.Roser-Renouf (2012) Global warming’s six Americas, March 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Six-Americas-March-2012.pdf
59. R.Lofstedt (2003) Risk communication: Pitfalls and promises. European Review11(3): 417–443.
60. T.Lowe (2006) Vicarious experience vs. scientific information in climate change risk perception and behaviour: A case study of undergraduate students in Norwich, UK. Technical report 43, May. Norwich: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
61. T.LoweK.BrownS.DessaiM.de Franca DoriaK.HaynesK.Vincent (2006) Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science15(4): 435–457.
62. S.LoyalB.Barnes (2001) Agency’ as a red herring in social theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences31(4): 507–524.
63. R.W.McChesney (2008) The Political Economy of Media: Enduring Issues, Emerging Dilemmas. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
64. A.M.McCright (2010) The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment32(1): 66–87.
65. M.Madianou (2005) Mediating the Nation. London: UCL Press.
66. E.J.MarshM.L.MeadeH.L.Roediger (2003) Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory and Language49: 519–536.
67. A.Mazur (2009) American generation of environmental warnings: Avian influenza and global warming. Human Ecology Review16(1): 17–26.
68. F.Mellor (2009) The politics of accuracy in judging global warming films. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture3(2): 134–150.
69. J.W.MeyerR.Jepperson (2000) The ‘actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory18(1): 100–120.
70. K.Mieszkowski (2006) Did Al get the science right? Available at: http://www.salon.com/2006/06/10/truths/
71. M.MorissonS.Hatfield-Dodds (2011) The success and failure of an inconvenient truth and the stern report in influencing Australian public support for greenhouse policy. The Economic Record87(277): 269–281.
72. S.C.Moser (2007) More bad news: The risk of neglecting emotional response to climate change information. In: S.C.MoserL.Dilling (eds) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–80.
73. R.L.MurrayJ.K.Heumann (2009) Ecology and Popular Film: Cinema on the Edge. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
74. H.N.Nariman (1993) Soap Operas for Social Change. Westport, CT: Praeger.
75. B.Nichols (1992) Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary Film. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
76. M.C.NisbetD.A.Scheufele (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany96(10): 1767–1778.
77. J.M.Nolan (2010) “An inconvenient truth” increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior42(5): 643–658.
78. C.Obermiller (1995) The baby is sick/the baby is well: A test of environmental communication appeals. Journal of Advertising24(2): 55–70.
79. S.O’NeillS.Nicholson-Cole (2009) ‘‘Fear Won’t Do It’’: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication30(3): 355–379.
80. L.Pellizoni (2005) Trust, responsibility and environmental policy. European Societies7(4): 567–594.
81. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2012) More say there is solid evidence of global warming. Available at: http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/15/more-say-there-is-solid-evidence-of-global-warming/
82. C.Podeschi (2002) The nature of future myths: Environmental discourse in science fiction film, 1950–1999. Sociological Spectrum22: 251–297.
83. M.Renov (1993) Introduction: The truth about non-fiction. In: M.Renov (ed.) Theorizing Documentary. London and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–11.
84. F.ReusswigA.Leiserowitz (2005) The international impact of The Day After Tomorrow. Environment47(3): 41–44.
85. F.ReusswigJ.SchwarzkopfP.Pohlenz (2004) PIK Report No. 92. Double Impact, The Climate BlockBuster ‘The Day after Tomorrow’ and Its Impact on the German Cinema Public. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Available at: http://www.pik-potsdam.de/research/publications/pikreports/.files/pr92.pdf
86. R.W.Rogers (1983) Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In: J.T.CacioppoR.E.Petty (eds) Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 153–177.
87. T.RosteckT.S.Frentz (2009) Myth and multiple readings in environmental rhetoric: The case of an inconvenient truth. Quarterly Journal of Speech95(1): 1–19.
88. C.Russill (2011) Truth and opinion in climate change discourse: The Gore–Hansen disagreement. Public Understanding of Science20(6): 796–809.
89. J.Saldana (2009) Popular film as an instructional strategy in qualitative research methods courses. Qualitative Inquiry15(1): 247–261.
90. M.SalvadorT.Norton (2011) The flood myth in the age of global climate change. Environmental Communication5(1): 45–61.
91. D.Sarewitz (2010) Entertaining science. Nature466(7302): 27.
92. S.H.Schwartz (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: L.Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, pp. 221–279.
93. S.Schwarze (2006) Environmental melodrama. Quarterly Journal of Speech92(3): 239–261.
94. R.Silverstone (1999) Why Study the Media?London: SAGE.
95. R.Silverstone (2002) Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New Literary History33(5): 745–764.
96. R.Silverstone (2005) Mediation and communication. In: C.CalhounC.RojekB.Turner (eds) The International Handbook of Sociology. London: SAGE, pp. 188–207.
97. A.SinghalE.M.Rogers (2002) A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory12(2): 117–135.
98. A.SinghalM.J.CodyE.M.RogersM.Sabido (2004) Entertainment-Education Worldwide: History, Research, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
99. L.SjobergE.Engelberg (2010) Risk perception and movies: A study of availability as a factor in risk perception. Risk Analysis30(1): 95–106.
100. P.Slovic (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis19(4): 689–701.
101. M.Stebbing (2009) Avoiding the trust deficit: Public engagement, values, the precautionary principle and the future of nanotechnology. Bioethical Inquiry6: 37–48.
102. A.StecklerJ.P.AllegranteD.AltmanR.BrownJ.N.BurdineR.M.Goodman (1995) Health education intervention strategies: Recommendations for future research. Health Education Quarterly22: 307–328.
103. P.SturgisN.Allum (2004) Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science13(1): 55–74.
104. M.Svoboda (2011) Communicating climate change five years after an inconvenient truth. Available at: http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2011/05/an-inconvenient-anniversary/
105. P.W.VaughanE.M.RogersA.SinghalR.M.Swalehe (2000) Entertainment education and HIV/AIDS prevention: A field experiment in Tanzania. Journal of Health Communication5: 81–100.
106. R.Von Burg (2012) Decades away or the day after tomorrow? Rhetoric, film, and the global warming debate. Critical Studies in Media Communication29(1): 7–26.
107. L.WallackL.DorfmanD.JerniganM.Themba (1993) Media Advocacy and Public Health. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
108. A.Weik von Mossner (2013) Troubling spaces: Ecological risk, narrative framing, and emotional engagement in The Age of Stupid. Emotion Space and Society6: 108–116.
109. J.A.Winsten (1994) Promoting designated drivers: The Harvard alcohol project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine10(Suppl. 3): 11–14.
110. YouGov (2012) YouGov/The Sunday Times Survey Results, 21–22June. Available at: http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/0w8gg3rki9/YG-Archives-Pol-ST-results-22-240612v2.pdf