Audience and readership research

The SAGE Handbook of Media Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 167-182

  Kitzinger, Jenny ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62349116317     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976077.n9     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Ang, I.(1985). WatchingDallas. London: Methuen.
2. Ang, I.(1991). Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.doi:10.4324/9780203321454 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203321454
3. Bandura, A. Ross, D. Ross, S. Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1963). 3-11.
4. Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Developing focus group research. London: Sage.
5. Barker, M., & Petley, J. (Eds.). (2001). Ill effects: The media/violence debate. London: Routledge.
6. Baym, N. K.(2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom and online community. London: Sage.doi:10.4135/9781452204710 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204710
7. Bobo, J.(1995). Black women as cultural readers. New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Brooker, W. Living on Dawson's Creek: Teen viewers, cultural convergence and television overflow. International Journal of Cultural Studies 4 (4) (2001). 456-472.
9. Corner, J.(1991). Meaning, genre and context: The problematics of "public knowledge" in the new audience studies. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 267-285). London: Edward Arnold.
10. Corner, J., Richardson, K., & Fenton, N.(1990). Nuclear reactions: Format and response in public issue television. London: J. Libbey.
11. The death of Diana [Special issue]. Screen 39 (1) (1998).
12. Ehrenreich, B., Hess, E., & Jacobs, G.(1992). Beatlemania: Girls just want to have fun. In L. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media (pp. 10-38). London: Routledge.
13. Eldridge, J. (Ed.). (1993). Getting the message. London: Routledge.doi:10.4324/9780203397404 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203397404
14. Eldridge, J., Kitzinger, J., & Williams, K.(1997). The mass media and power in modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Gamson, W.(1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gauntlett, D.(1997). Video critical: Children, the environment and media power. London: J. Libbey.
17. Geertz, C.(1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
18. Gerbner, G.(1973). Cultural indicators-The third voice. In G. Gerbner, L. Gross, & W. Milody (Eds.), Communications technology and social policy (pp. 553-575). New York: John Wiley.
19. Gillespie, M.(1995). Television, ethnicity and cultural change. London: Routledge.
20. Glasgow University Media Group. (1976). Bad news. London: Routledge.
21. Glasgow University Media Group. (1980). More bad news. London: Routledge.
22. Gray, A.(1987). Behind closed doors: Video recorders in the home. In H. Baehr & G. Dyer (Eds.), Boxed in: Women and television (pp. 38-54). London: Pandora.
23. Gray, A.(1999). Audience and reception research in retrospect: The trouble with audiences. In P. Alasuutari (Ed.), Rethinking the media audience (pp. 22-37). London: Sage.doi:10.4135/9781446216996 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216996
24. Hall, S.(1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies 1972-79 (pp. 128-138). London: Hutchinson.
25. Harper, S. Porter, V. Moved to tears: Weeping in the cinema in postwar Britain. Screen 37 (2) (1996). 152-173.
26. Henderson, L. Kitzinger, J. The human drama of genetics: "Hard" and "soft" media representations of inherited breast cancer. Sociology of Health and Illness 21 (5) (1999). 560-578.
27. Hill, A.(2001). Looks like it hurts: Women's responses to shocking entertainment. In M. Barker & J. Petley (Eds.), Ill effects: The media/violence debate (pp. 135-149). London: Routledge.
28. Hine, C.(2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
29. Hobson, D.(1982). Crossroads: The drama of a soap. London: Opera Methuen.
30. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D.(1987). News that matters: Television and American public opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Jayaprakash, T. Remote audiences beyond 2000: Radio, everyday life and development in South India. International Journal of Cultural Studies 3 (2) (2000). 227-239.
32. Jhally, S., & Lewis, J.(1992). Enlightened racism: The Cosby Show, audiences and the myth of the American Dream. Oxford, UK: Westview.
33. Johnson, K. Media and social change: The modernizing influences of television in rural India. Media, Culture & Society 23 (2) (2001). 147-169.
34. Jordin, M., & Brunt, R.(1988). Constituting the television audience: Problems of method. In P. Drummond & R. Paterson (Eds.), Television and its audiences. London: British Film Institute.
35. Katz, E., & Liebes, T.(1985). Mutual aid in decoding Dallas: Preliminary notes for a cross-culture study. In P. Drummond & R. Paterson (Eds.), Television and its audiences (pp. 187-198). London: British Film Institute.
36. Kitzinger, J. Audience understandings of AIDS media messages: A discussion. Sociology of Health and Illness 12 (3) (1990). 319-335.
37. Kitzinger, J.(1993). Understanding AIDS: Researching audience perceptions of acquired immune deficiency syndrome. In J. Eldridge (Ed.), Getting the message (pp. 271-304). London: Routledge.
38. Kitzinger, J. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interactions between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 16 (1) (1994). 103-121.
39. Kitzinger, J.(1999). A sociology of media power: Key issues in audience reception research. In G. Philo (Ed.), Message received (pp. 3-20). Harlow, UK: Longman.
40. Kitzinger, J. Media templates: Patterns of association and the (re)construction of meaning over time. Media, Culture & Society 22 (1) (2000). 64-84.
41. Kitzinger, J. Transformations of public and private knowledge: Audience reception, feminism and the experience of childhood sexual abuse. Feminist Media Studies 1 (1) (2001). 91-104.
42. Kitzinger, J.(2002). Impacts and influences: Media influence revisited: An introduction to the new effects research. In P. Cobley & A. Briggs (Eds.), The media: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 272-281). London: Longman.
43. Kitzinger, J.(2004). Framing abuse: Media influence and public understandings of sexual violence against children. London: Pluto Press.
44. Kitzinger, J., & Farquhar, C.(1999). The analytical potential of "sensitive moments" in focus group discussions. In R. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 156-172). London: Sage.
45. Lang, K., & Lang, G.(1991). Studying events in their natural setting. In K. Jensen & N. Jankowski (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies (pp. 193-215). London: Routledge.
46. Lewis, L. (Ed.). (1992). The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media. London: Routledge.doi:10.4324/9780203181539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203181539
47. Liebes, T., & Katz, E.(1990). The export of meaning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Lindlof, T. Shatzer, M. Media ethnography in virtual space: Strategies, limits and possibilities. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 42 (2) (1998). 170-189.
49. Livingstone, S. Wober, M. Lunt, P. Studio audience discussion programmes: An analysis of viewers' preferences and involvement. European Journal of Communication 9 (4) (1994). 355-387.
50. Lull, J.(1990). Inside family viewing: Ethnographic research on television's audiences. London: Routledge.
51. Lunt, P. Livingstone, S. Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication 16 (2) (1996). 79-98.
52. MacGregor, B. Morrison, D. From focus groups to editing groups: A new method of reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society 17 (1) (1995). 141-150.
53. McCombs, M. Shaw, D. The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (1972). 176-187.
54. Merton, R. K. The focussed interview and focus groups: Continuities and discontinuities. Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (4) (1987). 550-566.
55. Millard, W. A history of handsets for direct measurement of audience response. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 4 (1) (1992). 1-17
56. Miller, D., Kitzinger, J., Williams, K., & Beharrell, P.(1998). The circuit of mass communication: Media strategies, representation and audience reception in the AIDS crisis. London: Sage.
57. Miller, D. Philo, G. The active audience and wrong turns in media studies: Rescuing media power. Soundscape 4 (2001). Retrieved from http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/VOLUME04/Active_audience.html
58. Morley, D.(1980). The "nationwide" audience: Structure and decoding. London: British Film Institute.
59. Morley, D.(1986). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. London: Comedia.
60. Morley, D. Silverstone, R. Domestic communication. Media, Culture & Society 12 (1990). 31-55.
61. Morley, D., & Silverstone, R.(1991). Communication and context: Ethnographic perspectives on the media audience. In K. Henson & N. Jankowski (Eds.), A handbook for qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 149-162). London: Routledge.
62. Morrison, D.(1998). The search for a method: Focus groups and the development of mass communication research. Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
63. Newhagen, J. Cordes, J. Levy, M. Nightly-at-NCB: Audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the internet. Journal of Communication 45 (3) (1995). 164-175.
64. Nightingale, V. What's ethnographic about ethnographic audience research? Australian Journal of Communications 16 (1989). 50-63.
65. Nightingale, V.(1996). Studying audiences: The shock of the real. London: Routledge.
66. Nord, D. Reading the newspaper: Strategies and politics of reader response, Chicago 1912-1917. Journal of Communication 45 (3) (1995). 66-93.
67. Philo, G.(1990). Seeing and believing. London: Routledge.doi:10.4324/9780203326251 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203326251
68. Philo, G.(1999a). Children and film/video/TV violence. In G. Philo (Ed.), Message received (pp. 35-53). Harlow, UK: Longman.
69. Philo, G. (Ed.). (1999b). Message received. Harlow, UK: Longman.
70. Price, V. Tewksbury, D. Powers, E. Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research 24 (5) (1997). 481-506.
71. Pullen, K.(2000). http://I-love-Xena.com: Creating online fan communities. In D. Gauntlett (Ed.), Web studies: Rewriting media studies for the digital age (pp. 52-61). London: Edward Arnold.
72. Radway, J.(1984). Reading the romance: Feminism and the representation of women in popular culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
73. Reilly, J.(1999). "Just another food scare?" Public understanding and the BSE crisis. In G. Philo (Ed.), Message received (pp. 128-146). Harlow, UK: Longman.
74. Rossler, O. Brosius, H. Do talk shows cultivate adolescents' views of the world? A prolonged-exposure experiment. Journal of Communication 51 (1) (2001). 143-163.
75. Ruddock, A.(2001). Understanding audiences: Theory and method. London: Sage.
76. Ryfe, D. From media audiences to media public: A study of letters written in reaction to FDR's fireside chats. Media, Culture & Society 23 (6) (2001). 767-783.
77. Schlesinger, P., Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R., & Weaver, C. K.(1992). Women viewing violence against women. London: British Film Institute.
78. Schudson, M.(1991). Historical approaches to communication studies. In K. Jensen & N. Jankowski (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methods for mass communication research (pp. 175-191). London: Routledge.
79. Smoodin, E. The business of America: Fan mail, film reception and Meet John Doe. Screen 37 (2) (1996). 111-128.
80. Sood, S. Rogers, E. Dimensions of parasocial interaction by letter-writers to a popular entertainment-education soap opera in India. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 44 (3) (2000). 386-414.
81. Stacey, J.(1994). Star gazing: Hollywood cinema and female spectatorship. London: Routledge.
82. Sundar, S. Nass, C. Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication 51 (1) (2001). 52-72.
83. Tufte, T.(2002). Communicating about domestic violence, rape and HIV/AIDS in South Africa: A reception analysis of viewers' letters. In C. Byerly & K. Ross (Eds.), Mapping the field: Women and media. London: Sage.
84. Van Zoonen, L. Wieten, J. It wasn't exactly a miracle: The arrival of television in Dutch family life. Media, Culture & Society 16 (1994). 641-659.
85. Werner, K.(2001). Coming close to God through the media: A phenomenology of the media practices of Islamist women in Egypt. In K. Hafez & D. Paletz (Eds.), Mass media, politics and society in the Middle East. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
86. Young, L. Black women as cultural readers-Bobo, J. Screen 37 (4) (1996). 400-408.